Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(46,104 posts)
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 08:52 PM Dec 2017

Pocket Veto?

Why Trump Won't Be Signing His Tax Cuts Right Away


But despite Trump’s impatience for tax cuts, he might not actually sign the landmark bill into law right away, White House advisers said. In fact, Trump might wait until the new year, pushing the outer boundary of the 10 days the Constitution gives the president to affix his signature to legislation passed by Congress.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/12/why-trump-wont-be-signing-his-tax-cuts-right-away/548906/?utm_source=atlfb

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pocket Veto? (Original Post) no_hypocrisy Dec 2017 OP
He and his team are so incompetent Sanity Claws Dec 2017 #1
That was my first thought upon reading the OP subject line. GeorgeGist Dec 2017 #7
Save me, back me up on the Mueller firing California_Republic Dec 2017 #2
is congress actually in recess? unblock Dec 2017 #3
The Republicans may drop the ball on a symbolic session. no_hypocrisy Dec 2017 #4
obviously it would be delicious for them to screw this up unblock Dec 2017 #5
Shhh!!!! 2naSalit Dec 2017 #6

unblock

(52,227 posts)
3. is congress actually in recess?
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 09:03 PM
Dec 2017

if congress is technically still in session, even if it's just gavel-in, gavel-out once every 3 days or whatever, then it becomes law without his signature after 10 days.

it's only a pocket veto if 10 days go by without a signature *and* congress is in recess.

unblock

(52,227 posts)
5. obviously it would be delicious for them to screw this up
Wed Dec 20, 2017, 09:08 PM
Dec 2017

especially as jones would likely then be seated, though they still would have the votes.

anyway, i thought i heard months ago that they still wanted to prevent donnie from making recess appointments for some reason.

dunno for sure, haven't read anything about it lately.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pocket Veto?