Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 11:34 AM Dec 2017

Hitler's Enabling Act

Our country is in a very precarious position at this moment. Our leaders are threatening other nations at the United Nations and the Republican Party is enabling the autocrat Trump at every turn.
===================================

http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/enabling.htm

<snip>
On March 23, 1933, the newly elected members of the German Parliament (the Reichstag) met in the Kroll Opera House in Berlin to consider passing Hitler's Enabling Act. It was officially called the 'Law for Removing the Distress of the People and the Reich.' If passed, it would effectively mean the end of democracy in Germany and establish the legal dictatorship of Adolf Hitler.

The 'distress' had been secretly caused by the Nazis themselves in order to create a crisis atmosphere that would make the law seem necessary to restore order. On February 27, 1933, they had burned the Reichstag building, seat of the German government, causing panic and outrage. The Nazis successfully blamed the fire on the Communists and claimed it marked the beginning of a widespread uprising.

On the day of the vote, Nazi storm troopers gathered in a show of force around the opera house chanting, "Full powers - or else! We want the bill - or fire and murder!!" They also stood inside in the hallways, and even lined the aisles where the vote would take place, glaring menacingly at anyone who might oppose Hitler's will.

Just before the vote, Hitler made a speech to the Reichstag in which he pledged to use restraint.

"The government will make use of these powers only insofar as they are essential for carrying out vitally necessary measures...The number of cases in which an internal necessity exists for having recourse to such a law is in itself a limited one." - Hitler told the Reichstag.

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hitler's Enabling Act (Original Post) kentuck Dec 2017 OP
Congress can't pass a bill to negate the Constitution brooklynite Dec 2017 #1
I've stopped saying what they can and cant do...They already step Ferrets are Cool Dec 2017 #2
The Republicans are "enabling" him... kentuck Dec 2017 #5
Donald has tried to de-legitimize the courts. treestar Dec 2017 #3
...and that hasn't stopped the Courts from continuing to act. brooklynite Dec 2017 #4
They could take those Justices out in cuffs... kentuck Dec 2017 #6
Specifically, who is "they"? brooklynite Dec 2017 #8
Oh no! "They" have already threatened to take out the FBI in cuffs. kentuck Dec 2017 #10
Which right-wingers are going to walk up to the doors of Supreme Court... brooklynite Dec 2017 #11
That is a question you might ask Jeanine Perro when she said.... kentuck Dec 2017 #13
Yes, I always plan my life around Fox News pundits brooklynite Dec 2017 #17
So does the autocrat. kentuck Dec 2017 #18
The same type of people who shot up a Pizza Parlor looking for Hillary's Pedophile ring egold2604 Dec 2017 #28
Remind us how that worked out for him? brooklynite Dec 2017 #31
It's adorably naive you believe violence and force are necessary. LanternWaste Dec 2017 #41
Why not? atreides1 Dec 2017 #14
The answer is Republicans with excessive power Stargazer99 Dec 2017 #35
Okay, what about Martial Law? atreides1 Dec 2017 #9
Remember when Nixon tried to do that? brooklynite Dec 2017 #12
Do you believe Nixon and Watergate were more of a threat to our democracy? kentuck Dec 2017 #15
Trump isn't Nixon atreides1 Dec 2017 #19
Nixon didn't shit on himself in public either uponit7771 Dec 2017 #33
Don't you remember the ones who showed up during the 2000 Florida recount VMA131Marine Dec 2017 #26
The Brooks Brothers Riot...... EarnestPutz Dec 2017 #45
i wouldn't be so quick to assume our institutions will serve us. unblock Dec 2017 #30
You wanna bet? Already Trump wants his private (storm troopers, I call them) Stargazer99 Dec 2017 #34
No but they could ignore the Constitution and say they were following it. Kablooie Dec 2017 #36
Pretty sure you're wrong on that second part. sofa king Dec 2017 #43
And the Rest is History . . . peggysue2 Dec 2017 #7
sorry to say but bluestarone Dec 2017 #16
That would only happen if... kentuck Dec 2017 #20
and i'm bluestarone Dec 2017 #22
I only post this to remind people... kentuck Dec 2017 #21
If Trump passed his own Enabling Act mayhem would ensue. DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2017 #23
The "Trump tax cut" yesterday was like the first step... kentuck Dec 2017 #24
It's one of the crappiest pieces of legislation I have ever seen but it was lawful. DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2017 #25
He's already made himself Fuhrer... kentuck Dec 2017 #29
Exactly. The table of acolytes sitting around the table yesterday and thanking notdarkyet Dec 2017 #46
Several things in our favor though KatyMan Dec 2017 #27
Sorry, we've already fallen victim to dumbassery protest votes - that's how we got 45* groundloop Dec 2017 #32
Remember the Golden Rule... Toorich Dec 2017 #37
Judicial and law enforcement misconduct preceded Trump. DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2017 #38
What "Judicial misconduct" are you referring to? Nitram Dec 2017 #40
There are some big differences. Hitler was enormously popular. Nitram Dec 2017 #39
Whenever you hear them say they will only use their new powers where absolutely necessary... Kablooie Dec 2017 #42
Beware of the midterm elections. colorado_ufo Dec 2017 #44

brooklynite

(94,571 posts)
1. Congress can't pass a bill to negate the Constitution
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 11:39 AM
Dec 2017

Even this Supreme Court would block them if they did...


and there's no equivalent to Nazi stormtroopers that will be showing up en masse without police intervention.

Ferrets are Cool

(21,106 posts)
2. I've stopped saying what they can and cant do...They already step
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 11:42 AM
Dec 2017

all over the constitution...that isn't much different than negating it.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
3. Donald has tried to de-legitimize the courts.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 11:44 AM
Dec 2017

In reaction to their first actions regarding his first travel ban.

brooklynite

(94,571 posts)
8. Specifically, who is "they"?
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:01 PM
Dec 2017

The FBI?

The DC Police?

The Army?

Who are you assuming will act this irresponsibly?

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
10. Oh no! "They" have already threatened to take out the FBI in cuffs.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:03 PM
Dec 2017

The right-wingers.

First, they convince the people of the necessity.

brooklynite

(94,571 posts)
11. Which right-wingers are going to walk up to the doors of Supreme Court...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:05 PM
Dec 2017

...and force their way in without being shot by Court Officers.

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
13. That is a question you might ask Jeanine Perro when she said....
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:09 PM
Dec 2017

that the FBI should be marched out in "cuffs" for investigating Trump.

"They" stir the shit pot and the people follow like sheep.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
41. It's adorably naive you believe violence and force are necessary.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:14 PM
Dec 2017

It's adorably naive you believe violence and force are necessary to ignore a court. President Jackson ignored the supreme court's ruling against GA's takeover of Indian land. Lincoln, against the express order of the court, announced Habeus Corpus. Jefferson ignored the court's ruling of McCulloch v. Maryland.

An in none of those cases did "right-wingers walk up to the doors of the Supreme Court and force their way in..."

Bless your heart.

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
14. Why not?
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:10 PM
Dec 2017

I don't have the same confidence in those organizations that you seem to have! If those organizations can be convinced that they are acting under "legal" standards, do you actually believe they will question any orders or warrants they are given?

There aren't a lot of wave makers in law enforcement or the military, and somewhere along the way, they'll be reminded about how they're doing this to keep their families and the country safe...with a lot of emphasis on their families!!!

Show me one police officer, FBI agent, or military member, who would be willing to sacrifice their family to stand up for the US Constitution???

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
9. Okay, what about Martial Law?
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:02 PM
Dec 2017

Martial law on the national level may be declared by Congress or the president. Under Article I, Section 8, Clause 15, of the Constitution, Congress has the power "[t]o provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel Invasions." Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, of the Constitution declares that "[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States." Neither constitutional provision includes a direct reference to martial law. However, the Supreme Court has interpreted both to allow the declaration of martial law by the president or Congress.

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
15. Do you believe Nixon and Watergate were more of a threat to our democracy?
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:11 PM
Dec 2017

than the present bunch in power?

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
19. Trump isn't Nixon
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:16 PM
Dec 2017

So far the Republicans in Congress have basically done his bidding! Now that rat fucker Sessions is reopening a case that was closed, at Trump's bidding, and Goodlatte and Gowdy, two more rat fuckers are trying their best to shut down Muller's investigation by making specious claims based on the statement of an FBI agent, who didn't think much of Trump!

This is a different time and the Republicans don't want to give up power, these are not the same Republicans in Nixon's time! These men and women, I believe will do almost anything to maintain their grasp on power!!!

VMA131Marine

(4,139 posts)
26. Don't you remember the ones who showed up during the 2000 Florida recount
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:30 PM
Dec 2017

and stopped the counting of votes.

EarnestPutz

(2,120 posts)
45. The Brooks Brothers Riot......
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:41 PM
Dec 2017

.....they were called at the time. Florida was undecided and dealing
with hanging chads and James Baker had a bunch of Republican congressional
aides flown down to Miami to act as professional protestors for the television
cameras. They pushed and shoved and chanted as only prep school assholes
could, demanding that the ballot counting stop.

unblock

(52,227 posts)
30. i wouldn't be so quick to assume our institutions will serve us.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:33 PM
Dec 2017

if the supremes don't deliver for donnie, even if by a vote of 9-0, congress could pass, and the president could sign, a law adding 10 more justices to the supreme court. donnie could appoint, and the senate could confirm (using the nuclear option to evade any democratic filibuster), all insane donnie loyalists, who could then outvote the 9 current justices.

Stargazer99

(2,585 posts)
34. You wanna bet? Already Trump wants his private (storm troopers, I call them)
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 01:47 PM
Dec 2017

Here in Tacoma WA a few of us have found out about a detention center in Tacoma that when they put you in there literally disappear from existence. I also understand the government has made structures to contain the people if some major thing happens. With all the lying I"ve seen come from the Republican party I have a tendancy not to disbelieve anything happening and that detention camp I am talking about is NOT the illegal persons detention center....keep on sleeping at the switch

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
36. No but they could ignore the Constitution and say they were following it.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:09 PM
Dec 2017

Sure, honest people would protest but if they have enough control over government nothing would be done to correct the situation.

That's what they are aiming for and they are getting close.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
43. Pretty sure you're wrong on that second part.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:22 PM
Dec 2017

Tiki-torch sales are through the roof. You can't expect American rednecks to be as industrious as the Nazis, but they're at least as violent, hateful, and ignorant. And they are legion.

peggysue2

(10,828 posts)
7. And the Rest is History . . .
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 11:52 AM
Dec 2017

as they say. Also, History has a nauseating way of repeating itself, particularly when people are unaware and/or asleep.

There was a time when the very mention of Hitler's name and/or references to the era ended all reasonable discussion because comparisons were considered ridiculous hyperbole.

Sadly, we're not living in that time.

The Reichstag fire has been mentioned before and deserves repeating because there's nothing normal in what we're witnessing. Eerily, Trump's rise to power does smack of a hideous antecedent.

We must never forget. Ever.

bluestarone

(16,940 posts)
16. sorry to say but
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:11 PM
Dec 2017

i feel the only end to this will be COMPLETE CIVIL WAR! at this point if and or Mueller is stopped, WE NO LONGER HAVE A CHOICE!! we are being overtaken from the inside with Russian help (and congress's blessing) it will be up to all of us here (this site) and across America. Will it be North verses South all over again? Time will tell.

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
20. That would only happen if...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:19 PM
Dec 2017

...for some reason, we were not permitted to vote in the next couple of elections. If for some reason, elections were cancelled, all hell would break loose. Short of that, I don't see much happening until the next election.

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
24. The "Trump tax cut" yesterday was like the first step...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:25 PM
Dec 2017

It was a piece of crap but the Republicans passed it mostly to "enable" Trump and to strengthen their own positions with his "base".

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
25. It's one of the crappiest pieces of legislation I have ever seen but it was lawful.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:28 PM
Dec 2017

Trump making himself Fuhrer wouldn't be.

notdarkyet

(2,226 posts)
46. Exactly. The table of acolytes sitting around the table yesterday and thanking
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 04:20 PM
Dec 2017

And praising him for his “leadership” was sickening, and hitler like. A crappy bills, a horrible man, demanding his followers fealty. Made me want to puke. Hope you all are learning Russian. I’m heading for the hills.

KatyMan

(4,190 posts)
27. Several things in our favor though
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:30 PM
Dec 2017

One, a pretty stable government. Germany had gone through several cabinets and governments since WWI, so there was no real governmental stability. No matter what we think of our current group of congressfolks, this isn't the Papen or Schleicher cabinets that were able to rule by decree.
Second, a pretty stable economy. Germany was feeling the same effects from the Depression that we did here, and that led to a lot of instability.
And as someone mentioned above, there aren't armed bands of SA men roaming the country causing disorder.
We're a much larger and far less homogeneous group than the Germany of 1933 and I dare say a much more mature society.

I agree with the idea of the 'steps toward facism' etc and find the new book by Thomas Childers on Nazi Germany makes one think of how similar certain situations are to today (the Trumps and Republicans really are using the rise of the Nazis as a playbook), but we have the power in 2018 to change that, and if we all vote (and avoid dumbassery like protest votes), we can harness this beast because America is bigger than that. WE are bigger than that.

groundloop

(11,519 posts)
32. Sorry, we've already fallen victim to dumbassery protest votes - that's how we got 45*
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 01:17 PM
Dec 2017

I do respect your optimism though, I certainly hope it's well placed.

Toorich

(391 posts)
37. Remember the Golden Rule...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:09 PM
Dec 2017

"He who has the gold rules."
Every day in courts across this country we see illegally obtained evidence used against accused citizens.
Every day coerced confessions or the false claim of a confession are used in evidence against our fellow citizens.
Every day lying jail house snitches testify against our falsely accused neighbor or her child.
Every day police and prosecutors hide or destroy evidence which shows the accused person is innocent.
Every day certain judges, who are afraid of being labeled "soft on crime," allow this trampling of the Constitution.
Every day politicians who are afraid of being thought of as "soft on crime" pass laws which ignore constitutional safeguards.
Every day we sit on juries and play along because we don't want anyone to think we like robbers, rapists, or molesters.
So long as we elect these people to the legislature and courts and prosecutors offices and city halls and police stations and sheriffs offices, and we look the other way, then this nightmare can and probably will happen.

Nitram

(22,801 posts)
39. There are some big differences. Hitler was enormously popular.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:13 PM
Dec 2017

the German people had suffered economic devastation under the terms of the Treaty of Versailles and had to pay France and England huge reparations for WWI. The Depression hit and made things even worse. Inflation ravaged the economy. Hitler had organized the paramilitary Brownshirts and the SS, who took advantage of a lawlessness that reigned throughout Germany at the time. Finally, Germany was a country that had experienced only 14 years of democracy when Hitler became chancellor and quickly took over as dictator.

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
42. Whenever you hear them say they will only use their new powers where absolutely necessary...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:15 PM
Dec 2017

it means a coup has taken place and your government is gone.

If the government wants new powers but promises to use them with restraint, always look at what would happen if they were used with total unrestraint because history shows that's how they will be used.

colorado_ufo

(5,734 posts)
44. Beware of the midterm elections.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:22 PM
Dec 2017

They already suspect that they are going to lose, and if opinion closer to the election dates materializes this as true, something will be devised to change, postpone, or corrupt the election in order to keep them in power.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hitler's Enabling Act