Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:11 PM Dec 2017

171 members of Congress announce letter of support today for Mueller, anticipate firing over holiday

Natasha Bertrand‏ @NatashaBertrand 1h1 hour ago
House Dems will hold a press conference today to announce their support for Mueller, will also announce a letter of support signed by 171 members of Congress.
(Between this & Warner's speech yesterday, Dems seem really worried Trump will move to fire Mueller over the holidays.)



56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
171 members of Congress announce letter of support today for Mueller, anticipate firing over holiday (Original Post) bigtree Dec 2017 OP
Be ready to hit the streets and protest ASAP. Here is info for your area... BigmanPigman Dec 2017 #1
I just sent my rsvp. redwitch Dec 2017 #6
I'm going to Veteran's Plaza in Silver Spring MD NastyRiffraff Dec 2017 #10
We are ready to roll and ready to rumble Sam McGee Dec 2017 #20
...."unarmed. This time." sprinkleeninow Dec 2017 #29
Frank Ogawa Plaza wryter2000 Dec 2017 #31
If Trump called up Mueller and told him he was fired that would not cause Mueller Maraya1969 Dec 2017 #2
Maybe Donnie Two Scoops... Dopers_Greed Dec 2017 #3
And maybe Mueller has all these records Mr.Bill Dec 2017 #4
I'm sure of that. He probably has things planned out and ready to go without him. Maraya1969 Dec 2017 #5
So did President Obama Hekate Dec 2017 #12
It can not be signed only by Democrats IMnotU Dec 2017 #15
Not True. Democrats saved our country practically by themselves during Sophia4 Dec 2017 #25
What "can't be signed only by democrats", IMnotU? Hekate Dec 2017 #33
I Agree and Horizens Dec 2017 #52
I'd like to know why the others didn't sign. There must be a reason. Maybe Maraya1969 Dec 2017 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author INdemo Dec 2017 #8
Trump could fire Rosenstein watoos Dec 2017 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author mobeau69 Dec 2017 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author mobeau69 Dec 2017 #22
It wouldn't work that way. mobeau69 Dec 2017 #23
That's what Nixon did marylandblue Dec 2017 #28
He could make a recess appointment without Senate approval. nt pnwmom Dec 2017 #55
if Mueller is fired all i say is bluestarone Dec 2017 #7
How many time do tRump and Huckabee have to say HE's not firing Mueller? Bayard Dec 2017 #9
Pence? Duppers Dec 2017 #11
thats less than a majority of the members of Congress,,,,,,,, Cryptoad Dec 2017 #13
Read to go too. There will be four to six of us with signs. ffr Dec 2017 #16
Also a lot of good information in support of Mueller here from Seth Abramson NewJeffCT Dec 2017 #17
Thank you so much for this, LOOK at THIS Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #30
Saturday Night Massacre wryter2000 Dec 2017 #34
Not if the replacement has to be approved by Congress first. Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #35
That's not how it worked wryter2000 Dec 2017 #38
The REPLACEMENT has to be approved, someone has to take the job THEN fire Mueller Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #40
The replacement has to be approved wryter2000 Dec 2017 #41
More about this here Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #42
Nevertheless Cox never returned to his post wryter2000 Dec 2017 #45
This isn't theoretical. It's already happened wryter2000 Dec 2017 #44
Link to "un-rolled" web friendly thread here emulatorloo Dec 2017 #53
thanks! NewJeffCT Dec 2017 #54
I've seen lots of detailed posts saying "Trump can't fire Mueller" so which is it????? nt BamaRefugee Dec 2017 #18
Trump will act through a surrogate. Sophia4 Dec 2017 #26
Trump can fire Rosenstein wryter2000 Dec 2017 #39
If (when) Trump fires Mueller, TAKE TO THE STREETS!!!! Sam McGee Dec 2017 #19
Welcome to DU, Sam McGee! calimary Dec 2017 #37
Done defacto7 Dec 2017 #24
I still think something may happen tomorrow. dewsgirl Dec 2017 #27
If there is a firing they'll fire the whole team underpants Dec 2017 #32
That's just pitiful. procon Dec 2017 #36
Any Republicans signed? IluvPitties Dec 2017 #43
... Skittles Dec 2017 #46
Link to Reuters nitpicker Dec 2017 #47
thanks, nitpicker bigtree Dec 2017 #48
Yesterday Nick Ackerman was on a DeminPennswoods Dec 2017 #49
I will be out protesting if Mueller is fired over the holidays Gothmog Dec 2017 #50
So where are the other Dems in congress awesomerwb1 Dec 2017 #51
 

Sam McGee

(347 posts)
20. We are ready to roll and ready to rumble
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:35 PM
Dec 2017

Here in rural Virginia, we already have 25 of us lined to descend on Richmond and Tappahannock.

I already have two signs made:
-- I CAME UNARMED. THIS TIME.
-- THE 2D AMENDMENT IS NOT ABOUT SQUIRREL HUNTING

sprinkleeninow

(20,248 posts)
29. ...."unarmed. This time."
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:55 PM
Dec 2017

The ignoramuses 'think' (way overstatement) that Dems are wimpy wilting fuzzy wuzzies that do not harbor firearms or weapons of any sort. Not even a slingshot. And that lily-livered Dems feel icky entertaining such a notion.

Okaaaay. El stupidos. Have your 'thoughts'.

Also, I hope there's no 'rolling', but we shall see.

Hub feels marches/descending on streets, highways, biways will not bring about the desired result of cleaning out We the Peoples House et al, but I know him. And he may change his mind.

Maraya1969

(22,480 posts)
2. If Trump called up Mueller and told him he was fired that would not cause Mueller
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:48 PM
Dec 2017

to vacate the office right? Do these people think that Trump is going to fire the acting Attorney General, hire a new one and then have that new person fire Mueller all in one day?

Dopers_Greed

(2,640 posts)
3. Maybe Donnie Two Scoops...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:55 PM
Dec 2017

...has a group of thugs ready to storm into Mueller's office and start smashing electronics and stealing records.

Hekate

(90,686 posts)
12. So did President Obama
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:07 PM
Dec 2017

The mills of the gods grind slowly, but they grind exceeding small.

Here's hoping our republic can be saved by the good people doing their part. Now let's do our part and GOTV.

 

IMnotU

(52 posts)
15. It can not be signed only by Democrats
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:18 PM
Dec 2017

It must be non-partisan to be worth anything. Otherwise, it will be pictured as just another Democratic attack on Trump.

 

Sophia4

(3,515 posts)
25. Not True. Democrats saved our country practically by themselves during
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:45 PM
Dec 2017

the Roosevelt years.

We can do that again.

Hekate

(90,686 posts)
33. What "can't be signed only by democrats", IMnotU?
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:00 PM
Dec 2017

I thought we were talking about factual evidence, its existence, and the likelihood that it can't all be destroyed because it is duplicated in numerous places.

In addition we also know that the State of New York is working on their own investigations, which are not subject to federal control, much less presidential control.

Maraya1969

(22,480 posts)
56. I'd like to know why the others didn't sign. There must be a reason. Maybe
Fri Dec 22, 2017, 05:23 PM
Dec 2017

they just couldn't be contacted on time.

Response to Maraya1969 (Reply #2)

Response to Maraya1969 (Reply #2)

Response to Maraya1969 (Reply #2)

mobeau69

(11,144 posts)
23. It wouldn't work that way.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:40 PM
Dec 2017

See Saturday night massacre. Dotard would just go down the line of authority at DOJ until he found a wannabe, which was #3 (Bork) in Watergate.

Damn, 3rd time's a charm!

Bayard

(22,073 posts)
9. How many time do tRump and Huckabee have to say HE's not firing Mueller?
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 01:27 PM
Dec 2017

He'll have someone else do it.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
13. thats less than a majority of the members of Congress,,,,,,,,
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:09 PM
Dec 2017

that doesn't sound like good thingy to me?

Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts)
30. Thank you so much for this, LOOK at THIS
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:56 PM
Dec 2017
6/ If Trump fires Rosenstein, his replacement will have to get through Congress, so the idea Trump can simply insert a stooge who will stop Mueller from issuing indictments is wrong. Likewise, saying that just because someone hasn't been indicted yet means they won't be is wrong

wryter2000

(46,045 posts)
34. Saturday Night Massacre
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:01 PM
Dec 2017

Was all done within hours. There was no need to face Congress at all. The Orange Abomination would simply continue to fire people until he got to one who's fire Mueller.

wryter2000

(46,045 posts)
38. That's not how it worked
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:11 PM
Dec 2017

Nixon ordered the Attorney General to fire Cox. When he resigned, Nixon ordered the Deputy Attorney General to fire Cox. When he resigned, Nixon ordered Robert Bork to do it, and Bork did.

It was all done within hours. No one had to go before Congress to do anything.

wryter2000

(46,045 posts)
41. The replacement has to be approved
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:50 PM
Dec 2017

But Mueller can be fired before a new person is approved.

Google Nixon's Saturday Night Massacre.

Trump fires Rosenstein and then orders Rosenstein's subordinate to fire Mueller. If that person (person 2) fires Mueller, Mueller's out. If person 2 doesn't fire Mueller, Trump fires person 2 and then orders the third in command to fire Mueller. And on and on until someone fires Mueller.

That's how Richard Nixon fired Archibald Cox. it took a couple of hours on a Saturday night. Cox was out before Congress woke up on Sunday morning.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts)
42. More about this here
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:54 PM
Dec 2017
Initially, the White House claimed to have fired Ruckelshaus,[2] but as an article published the next day by The Washington Post pointed out, "The letter from the President to Bork also said Ruckelshaus resigned."[2]

The night he was fired, Cox's deputy prosecutor and press aides held an impassioned news briefing and read the following statement from him, "Whether ours shall continue to be a government of laws and not of men is now for Congress and ultimately the American people."[7]

On November 14, 1973, federal district judge Gerhard Gesell ruled firing Cox was illegal absent a finding of extraordinary impropriety as specified in the regulation establishing the special prosecutor's office.[5] Congress was infuriated by what it saw as a gross abuse of presidential power as were many Americans, who sent an unusually large number of telegrams to the White House and Congress in protest.[8][9][10]

Less than a week after the Saturday Night Massacre, an Oliver Quayle poll for NBC News showed that, for the first time, a plurality of U.S. citizens supported impeaching Nixon, with 44% in favor, 43% opposed, and 13% undecided, with a sampling error of 2 to 3 per cent.[11] In the days that followed, numerous resolutions of impeachment against the president were introduced in Congress.

But the House Judiciary Committee did not approve its first article of impeachment until July 27 the following year – more than nine months after the Saturday Night Massacre – when it charged Nixon with obstruction of justice. Two more articles of impeachment quickly followed.

Nixon resigned fewer than two weeks later, on August 8, 1974.


More to it as to how a court would deal with it...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Massacre

wryter2000

(46,045 posts)
45. Nevertheless Cox never returned to his post
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:59 PM
Dec 2017

It remains to be seen what a court would do. As to impeachment, we have a different Republican party today than we did back then.

wryter2000

(46,045 posts)
44. This isn't theoretical. It's already happened
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:58 PM
Dec 2017

[link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/watergate/articles/102173-2.htm|

Richardson resigned when Mr. Nixon instructed him to fire Cox and Richardson refused. When the President then asked Ruckelshaus to dismiss Cox, he refused, White House spokesman Ronald L. Ziegler said, and he was fired. Ruckelshaus said he resigned.

Finally, the President turned to Solicitor General Robert H. Bork, who by law becomes acting Attorney General when the Attorney General and deputy attorney general are absent, and he carried out the President's order to fire Cox. The letter from the President to Bork also said Ruckelshaus resigned.

These dramatic developments were announced at the White House at 8:25 p.m. after Cox had refused to accept or comply with the terms of an agreement worked out by the President and the Senate Watergate committee under which summarized material from the White House Watergate tapes would be turned over to Cox and the Senate committee.

wryter2000

(46,045 posts)
39. Trump can fire Rosenstein
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:12 PM
Dec 2017

He can keep firing people until he gets to someone who will fire Mueller. Just the way Nixon fired Archibald Cox.

 

Sam McGee

(347 posts)
19. If (when) Trump fires Mueller, TAKE TO THE STREETS!!!!
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:34 PM
Dec 2017

In case you have not seen this -- if (when) Trump fires Mueller, there is a plan in place to take to the streets nationwide.

Go to this site:
https://act.moveon.org/event/mueller-firing-rapid-response-events/search/

Find your state and the closest town/city, sign up, go.

I already have two signs made:
-- I CAME UNARMED. THIS TIME.
-- THE 2D AMENDMENT IS NOT ABOUT SQUIRREL HUNTING

calimary

(81,267 posts)
37. Welcome to DU, Sam McGee!
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:06 PM
Dec 2017

On it. Already know the location, printed out the notice, and hung it on my wall.

underpants

(182,803 posts)
32. If there is a firing they'll fire the whole team
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:00 PM
Dec 2017

Thinking that will slow everything down until they hand pick a team. That's my prediction.

procon

(15,805 posts)
36. That's just pitiful.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:04 PM
Dec 2017

There are a total of 535 Members of Congress, 100 in the Senate and 435 in the House. There are 248 Republicans in the House and 192 Democrats. The Senate has 54 Republicans and 44 Democrats.

Out of the total 535 Members of Congress, if only 171 support Mueller, the vote won't even be close.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
49. Yesterday Nick Ackerman was on a
Fri Dec 22, 2017, 08:42 AM
Dec 2017

panel on one of the MSNBC evening shows. Someone else pointed out that Ackerman had previously mentioned a lawsuit against the Trump campaign and Roger Stone that's also in progress over the Russian interference. The noteworthy thing is that ALL the former intelligence chiefs (Hayden, Brennan, Clapper, etc) filed an Amicus Brief with the court. Ackerman said this was extremely rare at the district court level. But because of the need to protect classified info, the Amicus brief couldn't come right out and say what the former intell guys know that the Trump campaign/Stone conspired with Russia. So even if Mueller is fired, this case will continue. Further, there would be nothing to stop the plantiffs from hiring Mueller and his staff to help them with the lawsuit.

awesomerwb1

(4,268 posts)
51. So where are the other Dems in congress
Fri Dec 22, 2017, 01:26 PM
Dec 2017

who didn't sign the letter??

Don't we have 191 or 192 Dems in congress?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»171 members of Congress a...