General Discussion

Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts) Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:59 PM Dec 2017

A MUST see , Seth Abrahamson as to firing Mueller

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2F100210010584

including

6/ If Trump fires Rosenstein, his replacement will have to get through Congress, so the idea Trump can simply insert a stooge who will stop Mueller from issuing indictments is wrong. Likewise, saying that just because someone hasn't been indicted yet means they won't be is wrong.

I love that one. Congress has to go on record to appoint someone who will subvert justice and democracy.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A MUST see , Seth Abrahamson as to firing Mueller (Original Post) Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 OP

I don't think the Republicans in Congress will have a problem with this... TBA Dec 2017 #1

Oh hell no but it will help to show the country they are voting to subvert justice and turn Eliot Rosewater Dec 2017 #2

I think many Republicans up for re-election in next year's midterms will have a problem with it. LanternWaste Dec 2017 #5

this batch of republicans wouldn't even blink. barbtries Dec 2017 #3

Yeah, it will be a blistering confirmation hearing Stinky The Clown Dec 2017 #4

TBA

(825 posts)

1. I don't think the Republicans in Congress will have a problem with this...

Reply to Eliot Rosewater (Original post)

Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:02 PM

Dec 2017

"Congress has to go on record to appoint someone who will subvert justice and democracy."

Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts)

2. Oh hell no but it will help to show the country they are voting to subvert justice and turn

Reply to TBA (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:04 PM

Dec 2017

us into a dictatorship.

Will 34% of the public still vote for him? Sure, guaranteed, but not much more.

We have to have a civil war otherwise. Nobody wants that.

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)

5. I think many Republicans up for re-election in next year's midterms will have a problem with it.

Reply to TBA (Reply #1)

Thu Dec 21, 2017, 04:35 PM

Dec 2017

I think many Republicans up for re-election in next year's midterms will have a problem with it. It's a branding issue.

barbtries

(28,795 posts)

3. this batch of republicans wouldn't even blink.

Reply to Eliot Rosewater (Original post)

Thu Dec 21, 2017, 04:28 PM

Dec 2017

they don't give a shit.
watching youtube this morning, a clip of Rachel played; it was kind of old (early 2017?) and was all about Scott Pruitt. The reasons not to confirm him as head of the EPA were many and varied. This aired prior to his confirmation. I'm pretty sure he's still head of the EPA.
republicans don't care.

Stinky The Clown

(67,799 posts)

4. Yeah, it will be a blistering confirmation hearing

Reply to Eliot Rosewater (Original post)

Thu Dec 21, 2017, 04:31 PM

Dec 2017

Blisteringly FAST.

I predict the person would be confirmed within minutes. Just one question: Will you a TrumpToadie?

Reply to this discussion