General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKirsten Gillibrand, The Senate's unapologetic feminist, is leading the resistance against Trump
It makes sense, of course, that Congress' most unapologetic feminist would be best positioned to channel the white-hot rage that drove millions of women to take to the streets in protest of Trump's inauguration. "We are at a very intense moment," she says. "If you're not fighting, you're going to lose." But in certain ways, the Age of Trump has also helped propel a number of Gillibrand's most closely held causes.
She's long argued that until women are equally represented in Congress, the issues that matter to them won't get the attention or resources they deserve. Six years ago, she started Off the Sidelines, a PAC that supports women seeking public office. This year, she says, "a far greater number" of women than ever have reached out overall, Trump's election has spurred at least 16,000 women and counting to consider a run for office. "The silver lining of the Trump presidency is it is an era of activism, and one where women really want to be heard," Gillibrand says. "They are stepping up and owning their ambition and being willing to take risks they know that the things they love are at risk."
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/how-kirsten-gillibrand-is-outsmarting-donald-trump-w501354
brush
(53,778 posts)Response to oberliner (Original post)
Post removed
standingtall
(2,785 posts)The more time spent on sexual allegations the less time is spent discussing the Russia issue.
Demsrule86
(68,576 posts)I have no interest in anything she says as she showed really bad judgement in the Franken matter...glad you all in New York love...her and all . I wouldn't want her primaried or anything, but just not interested in her for higher office.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)What does that even mean? If it's $2 million to promote grassroots female activism then it's laudable.
Demsrule86
(68,576 posts)past. No doubt the women involved were great, but we have limited funds...this just seems like going through the motions to me.
jalan48
(13,865 posts)msongs
(67,406 posts)then followed the herd
onenote
(42,703 posts)She deserves credit for that. A lot of Democrats, including Al, should have followed her lead in that regard.
Demsrule86
(68,576 posts)onenote
(42,703 posts)unless we can get 51 votes?
Really?
Demsrule86
(68,576 posts)stuff.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)onenote
(42,703 posts)And you're fine that he did vote to confirm Kelly.
And it goes beyond nomination. Gillibrand has voted against the republican majority on cloture motions more often than any other Democrat.
Resisting doesn't mean voting for something because we can't defeat it.
Demsrule86
(68,576 posts)oasis
(49,387 posts)about meteors: "Now you see 'em, and now you don't".
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Yesterday's news.