Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it true that military personnel (Original Post) malaise Dec 2017 OP
I think poppy fields are worth $11,000 a sq. ft. ? Irish_Dem Dec 2017 #1
I don't know Sgent Dec 2017 #2
They wouldn't be using it in the first place without the opioid sickness JonLP24 Dec 2017 #5
I don't know what they are doing today JonLP24 Dec 2017 #3
Of course it is. disalitervisum Dec 2017 #4
Here is what I do know: the Taliban suppressed poppy growth harshly, but farmers saved seed... Hekate Dec 2017 #6
Thanks sis malaise Dec 2017 #9
Neither confirm nor deny tazkcmo Dec 2017 #7
Why? Mexico is the world's #3 opium poppy grower! elehhhhna Dec 2017 #8

Irish_Dem

(47,081 posts)
1. I think poppy fields are worth $11,000 a sq. ft. ?
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 07:21 PM
Dec 2017

So yah, I think America would have its hand in the till.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
2. I don't know
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 07:22 PM
Dec 2017

but the opioid deaths are being caused by Fent, which is synthetic (not derived from poppies).

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
5. They wouldn't be using it in the first place without the opioid sickness
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 07:26 PM
Dec 2017

I think it is fair to say there is a opiate crisis and there has been a rise in overdoses ever since fentanyl entered the market.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
3. I don't know what they are doing today
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 07:24 PM
Dec 2017

But the CIA admitted they backed war lords and drug traffickers. All sides of the conflict are in the opiate business and heroin availability and use age went up greatly since 2001. There are of course venture capitalists that would see heroin as an opportunity.

 

disalitervisum

(470 posts)
4. Of course it is.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 07:25 PM
Dec 2017

Doing business with the local warlords who control Afghanistan's major cash crop has always been the motivation for military intervention there. Similar to our Latin brothers' major cash crop in South America. They borrow against the collateral, and sooner or later have to return the money.

Hekate

(90,690 posts)
6. Here is what I do know: the Taliban suppressed poppy growth harshly, but farmers saved seed...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 07:33 PM
Dec 2017

...in sacks beneath their floors. Afghan farmers are poor, they contend with poor soil and dry conditions, and the poppy plant grows well in those conditions and turns a profit for them. Not a big profit, but definitely enough to help the family.

Post-American invasion, the Bush regime turned out to have an amazingly short attention span. They made a big deal about girls and schools and voting, and then (seemingly) could not sustain interest. As far as I could tell from the article, they never paid much attention to the situation of the farmers at all. But the amount of cash each farmer needed to sustain and improve their family lot was miniscule compared to the war budget.

So, after the next growing season the borderlands began to be flooded with cheap opium and heroin. Really cheap. Pakistani and other addicts moved to those border towns. It was only a matter of time before the old channels to Europe and America reopened.

Which, shortly, they did, and a drug we thought we had managed to get rid of in the US made a comeback.

Source: major American newspaper, probably the NY Times, cited at DU in the year following the Afghan invasion.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it true that military ...