Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

babylonsister

(171,066 posts) Fri Dec 22, 2017, 12:08 AM Dec 2017

5

That uranium deal?

I don't believe a word of it.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

That uranium deal? (Original Post) babylonsister Dec 2017 OP

There's no "it" to believe. StevieM Dec 2017 #1

Why do the media spend any time on that? Why do they ignore Trumps mob ties, as was cited in Gabi Hayes Dec 2017 #2

There's nothing really there...if it were it would of been exposed long long ago. n/t Kirk Lover Dec 2017 #3

If it mattered Trump could undo it with eminent domain Cicada Dec 2017 #9

Good to see you here this evening Babylonsister Pinkflamingo Dec 2017 #4

Hello, my friend! Long story. babylonsister Dec 2017 #6

This Could Only Mean One Thing... Grassy Knoll Dec 2017 #5

It is a nothing burger. Demtexan Dec 2017 #7

Let them investigate. Turbineguy Dec 2017 #8

StevieM

(10,500 posts)

1. There's no "it" to believe.

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Dec 22, 2017, 12:16 AM

Dec 2017

The story is beyond stupid.

Gabi Hayes

(28,795 posts)

2. Why do the media spend any time on that? Why do they ignore Trumps mob ties, as was cited in

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Dec 22, 2017, 12:16 AM

Dec 2017

A recent post here about WSJ killing a story on that.

What about Wilbur Ross/Deutschland bank/Cyprus bank/oligarch money laundering?

They are SILENT about all those, and myriad other stories that should’ve sunk his campaign at the outset

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)

3. There's nothing really there...if it were it would of been exposed long long ago. n/t

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Dec 22, 2017, 12:17 AM

Dec 2017

Cicada

(4,533 posts)

9. If it mattered Trump could undo it with eminent domain

Reply to Kirk Lover (Reply #3)

Fri Dec 22, 2017, 09:37 AM

Dec 2017

The theory is that we permitted something important to fall into the hands of the gol durn Russkies. Yet they don’t explain why Trump doesn’t just take it back. The fed govt takes property with eminent domain for roads, military bases etc. nothing stops us from taking the Uranium One mine back for national security needs.

Pinkflamingo

(177 posts)

4. Good to see you here this evening Babylonsister

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Dec 22, 2017, 12:21 AM

Dec 2017

👍

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)

6. Hello, my friend! Long story.

Reply to Pinkflamingo (Reply #4)

Fri Dec 22, 2017, 12:35 AM

Dec 2017

I will be in touch. xoxo

Grassy Knoll

(10,118 posts)

5. This Could Only Mean One Thing...

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Dec 22, 2017, 12:23 AM

Dec 2017

RedDonnie Is About To Get Fuck.

Demtexan

(1,588 posts)

7. It is a nothing burger.

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Dec 22, 2017, 01:08 AM

Dec 2017

Distraction.

Bob is coming.

Turbineguy

(37,331 posts)

8. Let them investigate.

Reply to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Dec 22, 2017, 01:17 AM

Dec 2017

They are desperate to prove they are idiots.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»That uranium deal?