Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
Sun Dec 31, 2017, 01:09 PM Dec 2017

The only reason Trump had interview with NYTimes reporter was to put Mueller on notice.

If you don't treat me fairly, in other words, if you don't clear me of any wrongdoing, then you should know that I have absolute control over the Justice Dept and you will be fired.

He was using the NYTimes reporter as a conduit to get that message to Mueller.

He always looks out for number one.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The only reason Trump had interview with NYTimes reporter was to put Mueller on notice. (Original Post) kentuck Dec 2017 OP
And Mueller, like the honey badger, don't care. The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2017 #1
Good cilla4progress Dec 2017 #2
Trump threatens his KFC before he eats it - it's who he is. He will fail. Justice will prevail. (nt) FreepFryer Dec 2017 #3
Mueller has zero fucks to give what dump thinks. onecaliberal Dec 2017 #4
Mueller isn't worried for himself Martin Eden Dec 2017 #5
Maybe another reason, too. pnwmom Dec 2017 #6
Yup. KPN Dec 2017 #7
I think his motivations were different but gave him a forum to spew his threats and propaganda Mr. Ected Dec 2017 #8
Maybe in a moment of lucidiy he thought that's what he was doing, but in the other moments... brush Dec 2017 #9
Hopefully it means Trump got some bad news in this last meeting... gulliver Dec 2017 #10

Martin Eden

(12,875 posts)
5. Mueller isn't worried for himself
Sun Dec 31, 2017, 03:33 PM
Dec 2017

He will do just fine personally if Trump fires him.

He's more concerned about the rule of law and the integrity of our elections.

pnwmom

(108,995 posts)
6. Maybe another reason, too.
Sun Dec 31, 2017, 03:36 PM
Dec 2017

He's putting on an act. He's acting like he's unconcerned and he won't fire with Mueller. And he won't.

He'll fire Rosenstein instead and put someone in place who will supervise Mueller by tying his hands behind his back and putting a gag over his mouth.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
8. I think his motivations were different but gave him a forum to spew his threats and propaganda
Sun Dec 31, 2017, 03:58 PM
Dec 2017

I think the NY Times was just about to run the bombshell article about Papadopoulos' drunken spilling of the beans to an Australian intelligence officer as the springboard for the Trump Russia investigation. Before they ran the story, they contacted the White House for comment. Trump was advised and then made certain that he would chase down the Times and spill. His motivation was to diffuse the impact of the extremely-prejudicial report and get in front of the story. And guess what? It kind of worked. We were all riveted to our computers and televisions on Thursday night awaiting this HUGE story to hit...and then...it didn't. We wondered why. Most likely because the Trump interview suddenly took on its own life and there was no time to unveil the bombshell. I think they held fast for 24 hours and then pushed it out.

As time goes on, we'll understand the relevance of this news story. It boogers up the GOP's attempt to sully the dossier and its author and purchaser(s), as they maintain it was the launch point for the investigation. In truth, it was not. Papadopoulos' pickled gasbaggery was. This story shoots an arrow through the heart of the GOP defense and counterargument.

Granted, Trump did use this stage to vaguely threaten Mueller, but that's just Trump being Trump. The man is running scared but putting on a big show to save his ample ass.

Won't work.

brush

(53,871 posts)
9. Maybe in a moment of lucidiy he thought that's what he was doing, but in the other moments...
Sun Dec 31, 2017, 04:05 PM
Dec 2017

of the interview he revealed how few of those he has.

gulliver

(13,195 posts)
10. Hopefully it means Trump got some bad news in this last meeting...
Sun Dec 31, 2017, 05:53 PM
Dec 2017

...with Trump's lawyers. Nunes is also apparently putting together a preemptive strike or two against Mueller. Whatever Mueller's got, it's not making Republicans happy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The only reason Trump had...