Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDana Boente, who Sessions maybe forced out, to replace Jim Baker at FBI.
FBI director, under pressure to make changes, is replacing Comey aides
FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, who has been under political pressure to remove top officials at the bureau, is filling two senior positions previously held by people who served under former director James B. Comey.
Dana Boente, the U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia who is acting head of the Justice Departments national security division, has been selected to be the FBIs next general counsel, according to three people familiar with the matter. He replaces James Baker, who was reassigned late last year.
Boente is a veteran federal prosecutor who has led multiple U.S. attorneys offices around the country and has risen to prominence in a variety of acting roles in the Trump administration. When President Trump fired Acting Attorney General Sally Yates over her refusal to defend his travel ban, Boente took over and said he would defend the measure.
... snip
Boentes move to the FBI is notable because some might view him as a Trump loyalist who has shown himself willing to go along with the presidents controversial agenda. Because he is a political appointee, he will have to clear some hurdles before taking a career position. Boente, though, is a respected law enforcement figure who has not been overtly political. He was appointed as a U.S. attorney under President Obama.
More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-director-under-pressure-to-make-changes-is-replacing-comey-aides/2018/01/23/e606d382-006e-11e8-8acf-ad2991367d9d_story.html?utm_term=.0ebc2f1d731e
FBI Director Christopher A. Wray, who has been under political pressure to remove top officials at the bureau, is filling two senior positions previously held by people who served under former director James B. Comey.
Dana Boente, the U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia who is acting head of the Justice Departments national security division, has been selected to be the FBIs next general counsel, according to three people familiar with the matter. He replaces James Baker, who was reassigned late last year.
Boente is a veteran federal prosecutor who has led multiple U.S. attorneys offices around the country and has risen to prominence in a variety of acting roles in the Trump administration. When President Trump fired Acting Attorney General Sally Yates over her refusal to defend his travel ban, Boente took over and said he would defend the measure.
... snip
Boentes move to the FBI is notable because some might view him as a Trump loyalist who has shown himself willing to go along with the presidents controversial agenda. Because he is a political appointee, he will have to clear some hurdles before taking a career position. Boente, though, is a respected law enforcement figure who has not been overtly political. He was appointed as a U.S. attorney under President Obama.
More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-director-under-pressure-to-make-changes-is-replacing-comey-aides/2018/01/23/e606d382-006e-11e8-8acf-ad2991367d9d_story.html?utm_term=.0ebc2f1d731e
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 2208 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dana Boente, who Sessions maybe forced out, to replace Jim Baker at FBI. (Original Post)
MelissaB
Jan 2018
OP
hlthe2b
(102,405 posts)1. Obama dropped Boente from line of succession--possibly as Trump bait?
sorry about the source, but I remember the gist of the following discussed on one or more evening MSNBC programs:
Near the end of President Obamas tenure, he signed an executive order which changed the line of succession at the Department of Justice for the sole purpose of demoting U.S. Attorney Dana Boente in that line. It seemed odd, both because Boente was a fairly recent Obama appointee, and because it was an uncharacteristically feeble move which Donald Trump was quickly able to undo. But based on recent developments, Obama may have been baiting Trump into doing precisely that.
After a series of chaotic moves including the recusal of Jeff Sessions and the departure of Mary McCord, yesterday it was rather predictably announced that Dana Boente has taken over the Trump-Russia investigation at the DOJ. The development seemed inevitable. After all, Obama had telegraphed that Boente was the one guy he didnt trust to prosecute Trump-Russia properly, so of course Trump eagerly put Boente in charge of the investigation. But heres the thing.
Hours after Boente took over, a report leaked out that multiple Trump-Russia grand juries are underway (link). Based on initial impressions, it appears Boente is handling the investigation properly and aggressively. And in hindsight, perhaps that shouldnt be a surprise. After all, Boente is someone whom President Obama clearly trusted when he appointed him back in 2014. So why on earth did Obama make a big show of demoting Boente before leaving office? Thats the key here.
Obamas executive order didnt actually remove Boente from his job or change anything about his position. All it did was state that Boente would be passed over if recusals began. So Obama didt punish Boente in any real world sense; he merely created the appearance that he had. And it may have been enough to bait Trump into concluding that Obama didnt trust Boente, and therefore Trump should trust Boente. If this was the plan all along, it means the person in charge of prosecuting Trump-Russia is precisely whom Obama wanted in charge of it all along and now its realistically too late for Trump to stop it.
http://www.palmerreport.com/opinion/president-obama-may-have-been-baiting-donald-trump-by-demoting-dojs-dana-boente/2503/
Near the end of President Obamas tenure, he signed an executive order which changed the line of succession at the Department of Justice for the sole purpose of demoting U.S. Attorney Dana Boente in that line. It seemed odd, both because Boente was a fairly recent Obama appointee, and because it was an uncharacteristically feeble move which Donald Trump was quickly able to undo. But based on recent developments, Obama may have been baiting Trump into doing precisely that.
After a series of chaotic moves including the recusal of Jeff Sessions and the departure of Mary McCord, yesterday it was rather predictably announced that Dana Boente has taken over the Trump-Russia investigation at the DOJ. The development seemed inevitable. After all, Obama had telegraphed that Boente was the one guy he didnt trust to prosecute Trump-Russia properly, so of course Trump eagerly put Boente in charge of the investigation. But heres the thing.
Hours after Boente took over, a report leaked out that multiple Trump-Russia grand juries are underway (link). Based on initial impressions, it appears Boente is handling the investigation properly and aggressively. And in hindsight, perhaps that shouldnt be a surprise. After all, Boente is someone whom President Obama clearly trusted when he appointed him back in 2014. So why on earth did Obama make a big show of demoting Boente before leaving office? Thats the key here.
Obamas executive order didnt actually remove Boente from his job or change anything about his position. All it did was state that Boente would be passed over if recusals began. So Obama didt punish Boente in any real world sense; he merely created the appearance that he had. And it may have been enough to bait Trump into concluding that Obama didnt trust Boente, and therefore Trump should trust Boente. If this was the plan all along, it means the person in charge of prosecuting Trump-Russia is precisely whom Obama wanted in charge of it all along and now its realistically too late for Trump to stop it.
http://www.palmerreport.com/opinion/president-obama-may-have-been-baiting-donald-trump-by-demoting-dojs-dana-boente/2503/
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)4. I know it's just an opinion, but I wish it were a better source. n/t
montanacowboy
(6,103 posts)6. Wray is sticking it to them!
hahah he is having none of Dump
I have changed my mind about this guy, I think he is on the up and up
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)7. This kind of 4D chess stuff makes me suspicious to be honest.
It seems more likely that Obama simply didn't trust the guy, but also didn't have anything concrete enough to actually demote/remove him.
MontanaMama
(23,344 posts)2. Hmmmm.
Not sure what to think of this.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)8. Same here....
OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)3. That's big news.....I wonder how Trump will react to it ?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)5. Don't look now buy that
firing is now coming back to take Donnie Dipstick out. Mr.Obama plays chess while Donnie the Stupid plays with himself.
eleny
(46,166 posts)9. Wow, Wray, who knew?!
babylonsister
(171,099 posts)10. Some theories on why Boente resigned here:
https://heavy.com/news/2017/10/why-did-dana-boente-resign-flynn/
Why Did Dana Boente Resign? The Top Theories
Why Did Dana Boente Resign? The Top Theories