Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Tue Jan 30, 2018, 07:56 PM Jan 2018

There are those here who ask "Is there really a difference between Melania and Stormy?" I say "Yes."

Melania is an employee, and Stormy was a contractor.

The real question here is "What's the difference between Stormy and the hundreds of other contractors Drumpf stiffed?"

Stormy found a way to get at least part of the compensation for the thankless job she did for him, without going to court.

I say this as someone who truly believes that sex work should be decriminalized, regulated, taxed and organized into a union, so the workers can be compensated for what they do, be it on-camera or at being chased around a room by a disgusting client in tighty-whiteys telling you how you are just like his daughter.

Why should benefits like health care, a path to citizenship, housing and childcare benefits be limited to those who marry their johns?

Or Donald Johns, as the case may be.



12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There are those here who ask "Is there really a difference between Melania and Stormy?" I say "Yes." (Original Post) ehrnst Jan 2018 OP
I bet Stormy didn't get a 1099, though. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2018 #1
Like any tax paperwork is going to get filed from the Don John. (nt) ehrnst Jan 2018 #4
i bet she did. unblock Jan 2018 #7
Good point. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2018 #8
Hmm, ok, how about this: unblock Jan 2018 #10
If a 1099 was issued and payment was made fescuerescue Jan 2018 #12
None TwistOneUp Jan 2018 #2
Stormy was barely stiffed if you catch my drift. John Fante Jan 2018 #3
Well, yes. In a different way. ehrnst Jan 2018 #5
Porn star1 gibraltar72 Jan 2018 #6
Stormy got $130K. What do the rest of us get? lindysalsagal Jan 2018 #9
The difference is Cheeto von Tweeto stiffed Stormy for considerably less time & affect . . . Journeyman Jan 2018 #11

unblock

(52,236 posts)
7. i bet she did.
Tue Jan 30, 2018, 08:20 PM
Jan 2018

if they went through the trouble to set up a shell company to make it appear like a legitimate business expense, why wouldn't they take the deduction?

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,705 posts)
8. Good point.
Tue Jan 30, 2018, 08:26 PM
Jan 2018

But they could have also disguised the payment as something else. If they issued a 1099 there would be a record of a payment to Stormy Daniels and some eyebrows could be raised if there was ever an audit. If you are going to pay off porn stars, the less of a paper trail you have, the better.

unblock

(52,236 posts)
10. Hmm, ok, how about this:
Tue Jan 30, 2018, 09:04 PM
Jan 2018

Donnie’s shell company buys consulting services from “xyz consultants”.

Stormey sets up a sole proprietorship called “tuv consultants”. She opens a bank account for tuv but tells the bank that “xyz consultants” is a d/b/a. She gives Donnie an invoice from xyz consultants.

She cashes the check made out to xyz consultants.

Donnie has a business expense and an invoice to back it up. Stormey has the cash. There’s no paper trail linking them unless the bank volunteered that xyz was a d/b/a for tuv consultants and that stormey was an authorized
person on that account.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
12. If a 1099 was issued and payment was made
Tue Jan 30, 2018, 09:27 PM
Jan 2018

The IRS doesn't care. It's just happy that the 1099 was issued for the payment. In the event of an audit, this is exactly what -SHOULD- happen.

What would raise eyebrows, would be if a payment was made without a 1099 or vice versa.

It's then up to the individual receiving the payment to account for it on their personal or business return.

TwistOneUp

(1,020 posts)
2. None
Tue Jan 30, 2018, 08:02 PM
Jan 2018

> What's the difference between Stormy and the hundreds of other contractors Drumpf stiffed?

None. They all got fucked. And no happy endings for anybody.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
5. Well, yes. In a different way.
Tue Jan 30, 2018, 08:12 PM
Jan 2018

i understand he didn't use lubricant when dealing with any contractor that he believed didn't have the resources to take him to court.

Journeyman

(15,031 posts)
11. The difference is Cheeto von Tweeto stiffed Stormy for considerably less time & affect . . .
Tue Jan 30, 2018, 09:08 PM
Jan 2018

than he did the contractors on his properties.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There are those here who ...