Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dvduval

(260 posts)
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 09:00 PM Feb 2018

Could Devon Nunez be arrested by the FBI?

Are there any circumstances in which Devon Nunez could be arrested by the FBI or another enforcement division of the government?

Could Devon Nunez be subpoenaed by the FBI to testify under oath?

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could Devon Nunez be arrested by the FBI? (Original Post) dvduval Feb 2018 OP
Yeah, well until being an asshole becomes a crime I don't think so... Wounded Bear Feb 2018 #1
of course he could get arrested of a crime trueblue2007 Feb 2018 #19
Devin Nunes. Iliyah Feb 2018 #2
If they do Cirque du So-What Feb 2018 #3
You win the thread malaise Feb 2018 #4
When all the various & sundry wits, wonks, scalawags & wiseasses are taken collectively Cirque du So-What Feb 2018 #8
For real malaise Feb 2018 #10
Look for the uniom label Generic Brad Feb 2018 #7
Yikes. Devon is a common African American name. That could turn into something not so funny. phleshdef Feb 2018 #15
Devo?? madinmaryland Feb 2018 #17
Also, not all of our last name's end with Z. Iggo Feb 2018 #21
The constitutional specifically contemplates members of Congress getting arrested. unblock Feb 2018 #5
I'm sure folks are digging up for his crimes as I type n/t malaise Feb 2018 #6
Have you seen this @toestringrd? dewsgirl Feb 2018 #12
No - I'm not on Twitter malaise Feb 2018 #20
If Mueller and his team got the Deutsche Bank documents that they requested in Dec, 2017... TheDebbieDee Feb 2018 #9
The Speech or Debate Clause (Art. I, Sec. 6, Cl. 1) of the Constitution immunizes The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2018 #11
Thanks so much for your post. Interesting excerpt AmericanActivist Feb 2018 #14
I would volunteer him for rendition....just saying Horse with no Name Feb 2018 #13
Yes, just like anyone else. nt USALiberal Feb 2018 #16
No, not like everyone else. See #11. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2018 #18

Cirque du So-What

(25,989 posts)
8. When all the various & sundry wits, wonks, scalawags & wiseasses are taken collectively
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 09:16 PM
Feb 2018

this place possesses a metric shit-ton of comedic talent.

unblock

(52,351 posts)
5. The constitutional specifically contemplates members of Congress getting arrested.
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 09:11 PM
Feb 2018

It says they can’t be arrested in Congress during a session or going to or from congress.

But as it’s not a blanket bar, the implication is that they can be arrested otherwise.

Whether they got the goods on him, that’s another question.

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
9. If Mueller and his team got the Deutsche Bank documents that they requested in Dec, 2017...
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 09:18 PM
Feb 2018

The FBI may be able to arrest many more elected republicans than Devin Nunes! This is why the republicans have become so freaked about the Mueller investigation since the Deutsche Bank documents were subpoenaed - by following the trail of money from the Russian oligarchs to Donald Trump, they will also be able to follow the money those same oligarchs thru the NRA and other US superPACS to the campaign coffers of dozens of republicans!

Mueller will be gunning for the whole republican party if the republicans don't shut down the investigation down soon!

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,877 posts)
11. The Speech or Debate Clause (Art. I, Sec. 6, Cl. 1) of the Constitution immunizes
Sat Feb 3, 2018, 09:20 PM
Feb 2018

members of Congress from arrest or prosecution for "legislative" acts. It says that senators and representatives "...shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place." This has been interpreted as providing civil and criminal immunity to members of Congress arising out of their official actions. However, in Gravel v. United States, the Supreme Court held that a grand jury could validly inquire into the processes by which a congressman obtained classified government documents and into the arrangements for subsequent private republication of these documents, since neither action involved protected conduct. “While the Speech or Debate Clause recognizes speech, voting and other legislative acts as exempt from liability that might otherwise attach, it does not privilege either Senator or aide to violate an otherwise valid criminal law in preparing for or implementing legislative acts.”

What happened in that case was that Senator Mike Gravel received a copy of the Pentagon Papers from an editor at The Washington Post, and Gravel smuggled the report into his Senate office.
After reading the material into the record, Gravel arranged to have the Pentagon Papers published by a private publisher. The trial court also held that publication of the Pentagon Papers by a private press was not protected by the Speech or Debate Clause. The Supreme Court upheld the district court's ruling regarding private publication. "[Private] publication by Senator Gravel through the cooperation of Beacon Press was in no way essential to the deliberations of the Senate; nor does questioning as to private publication threaten the integrity or independence of the Senate by impermissibly exposing its deliberations to executive influence."

So maybe it could be argued that disseminating the memo to the general public, Nunes might not be immune from prosecution for releasing classified materials. I don't know; it's a complicated issue.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could Devon Nunez be arre...