General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCould Devon Nunez be arrested by the FBI?
Are there any circumstances in which Devon Nunez could be arrested by the FBI or another enforcement division of the government?
Could Devon Nunez be subpoenaed by the FBI to testify under oath?
Wounded Bear
(58,726 posts)trueblue2007
(17,240 posts)ANYONE COULD
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)And I wish it would happen on national tv in front of t-rump.
LOL
Cirque du So-What
(25,989 posts)I hope they spell his name correctly on the warrant
malaise
(269,200 posts)This place is a riot
Cirque du So-What
(25,989 posts)this place possesses a metric shit-ton of comedic talent.
malaise
(269,200 posts)Generic Brad
(14,276 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)madinmaryland
(64,933 posts)Iggo
(47,572 posts)Mine does, but his doesn't.
unblock
(52,351 posts)It says they cant be arrested in Congress during a session or going to or from congress.
But as its not a blanket bar, the implication is that they can be arrested otherwise.
Whether they got the goods on him, thats another question.
malaise
(269,200 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)malaise
(269,200 posts)Thanks anyway
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)The FBI may be able to arrest many more elected republicans than Devin Nunes! This is why the republicans have become so freaked about the Mueller investigation since the Deutsche Bank documents were subpoenaed - by following the trail of money from the Russian oligarchs to Donald Trump, they will also be able to follow the money those same oligarchs thru the NRA and other US superPACS to the campaign coffers of dozens of republicans!
Mueller will be gunning for the whole republican party if the republicans don't shut down the investigation down soon!
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,877 posts)members of Congress from arrest or prosecution for "legislative" acts. It says that senators and representatives "...shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place." This has been interpreted as providing civil and criminal immunity to members of Congress arising out of their official actions. However, in Gravel v. United States, the Supreme Court held that a grand jury could validly inquire into the processes by which a congressman obtained classified government documents and into the arrangements for subsequent private republication of these documents, since neither action involved protected conduct. While the Speech or Debate Clause recognizes speech, voting and other legislative acts as exempt from liability that might otherwise attach, it does not privilege either Senator or aide to violate an otherwise valid criminal law in preparing for or implementing legislative acts.
What happened in that case was that Senator Mike Gravel received a copy of the Pentagon Papers from an editor at The Washington Post, and Gravel smuggled the report into his Senate office.
After reading the material into the record, Gravel arranged to have the Pentagon Papers published by a private publisher. The trial court also held that publication of the Pentagon Papers by a private press was not protected by the Speech or Debate Clause. The Supreme Court upheld the district court's ruling regarding private publication. "[Private] publication by Senator Gravel through the cooperation of Beacon Press was in no way essential to the deliberations of the Senate; nor does questioning as to private publication threaten the integrity or independence of the Senate by impermissibly exposing its deliberations to executive influence."
So maybe it could be argued that disseminating the memo to the general public, Nunes might not be immune from prosecution for releasing classified materials. I don't know; it's a complicated issue.
AmericanActivist
(1,019 posts)Except Treason, Felony or Breach of Peace interesting