General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Coppertone Girl Is a Little Creepy, Right? Just a Little?
Hey, parents! Have you always dreamed of your daughter being known worldwide as an oddly sexualized orange baby whose pants are eternally being eaten off by a dog? Well, your day has come, my friend! Merck & Company is reviving their classic "Coppertone girl" campaign with the "Little Miss Coppertone" contest. The winner gets to show their butt on the internet. Forever.
Through June 22, parents can submit photos of their daughters aged 2-7 (sons are BANNED!!!) to the Little Miss Coppertone Facebook page, where other parents and, uh, sunburned baby enthusiasts, can comment and bicker. Then a panel of judges, including some lady, will choose the finalists.
Revival campaigns like this one use the power of nostalgia as a marketing tool, says one Merck executive:
The contest is another example of what has been called comfort marketing, as Madison Avenue revives, with modern-day twists, familiar brand characters, jingles, slogans and ads. The goal is to appeal to consumers during today's tough times with soothing content but update it to reassure shoppers the products meet today's needs.
"Not only is she a famous trademark, she is a love mark," he said, and has "become a part of the fabric of the American summer."
"Love mark." Ew! (Weirdly, they've decided not to revive the "comforting" tagline, "Don't be a paleface!" )
https://jezebel.com/5907430/the-coppertone-girl-is-a-little-creepy-right-just-a-little''
Yeah this isn't recent but still interesting!
hlthe2b
(102,383 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,864 posts)Polly Hennessey
(6,807 posts)It was a cute picture that showed tan lines. Times truly are different now.
yuiyoshida
(41,864 posts)on those credentials alone!
bdamomma
(63,923 posts)nt
Ohiogal
(32,093 posts)Or maybe a better word would be "inappropriate"? Especially the idea that it is somehow a "beloved" ad from yesteryear.
yuiyoshida
(41,864 posts)Aunt Jamima newspaper ads...
And I wasn't much older than she was. Maybe that's why. Coppertone, I really wouldn't go there again, if I were you.
dlk
(11,578 posts)Given the high percentages of American children who are sexually abused, this ad campaign is a very poor idea to sell sunscreen. Is the marketing department too lazy to come up with a clever new idea?
Response to yuiyoshida (Original post)
femmedem This message was self-deleted by its author.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)the whole sunburn thing is just awful. Malignant melanoma in the making. My grandkids don't go outside unless they are slathered with sunscreen, like mayo on a bologna sandwich.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)the Hamm's beer commercial.
From the land of sky-blue wa-a-ters . . .
yuiyoshida
(41,864 posts)sammythecat
(3,568 posts)PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)MichMary
(1,714 posts)Great trip down memory lane!
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)That is gross. These people are idiots.
tanyev
(42,625 posts)All you could see were their backsides. She said something like, "I could just eat them up!" Now she was a grandmotherly type, so I absolutely do not think her reaction improper in a sexual way, but it still struck me as very odd. Then again, I am a happily childless woman who doesn't think human babies are irresistibly adorable, so what do I know?
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)and haven't never understood the eating them up comment. Yuck.
procon
(15,805 posts)half-naked Coppertone Girl ad on a billboard that could be seen from our schoolyard. It made me feel very uncomfortable, but that was the "Mad Men" era and all females, even toddlers, were treated as brainless sex objects for men.
yuiyoshida
(41,864 posts)President. What a disgusting fool he is too!
procon
(15,805 posts)changed with the times. He still has that same neanderthal, sexist attitude and he's too old and set in his ways to ever change now.
lapfog_1
(29,227 posts)I even vaguely remember a Playboy cover that spoofed the ad.
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)Who won? Did the company revive that ad concept? I think they abandoned it, due to objections at the time.
After a little research, I discovered who won that "Little Miss Coppertone" contest, and watched a video of the photo shoot, which was done in 2014. No dog. No bare bottom.
https://vimeo.com/97948228
yuiyoshida
(41,864 posts)would probably not want to reveal what they did, but I could be wrong.
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)It was just a publicity campaign. The old ad was never duplicated at all. I added the video of the actual 2014 photo shoot above.
I remember those original ads, actually, from the time. I saw a billboard or two in California. I don't remember being shocked by them, but that was a different time.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)She was dressed like any other kid her age at the beach (if not more with the coverup on).
I've seen worse on Toddlers and Tiaras.
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)in advertising that product. It bothered some people. Once it bothered enough people, it was dropped. It's not the 1950s any more. Advertising, more than any other business, tries to keep up with the times.
It's all in the eye of the beholder, really, and those beholders are potential customers.
crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)I do agree that in 2018 the 1950s cartoon girl with the bare butt is not appropriate.
MineralMan
(146,333 posts)Apparently, that company had similar contests every few years. I understand that Jodie Foster was once the model for one of the swimsuit/bare bottom versions. Funny!
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,864 posts)but I didn't write it..
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Oh noes!!! An article on the internet can do so much to so many with so little.
The important thing is we minimize and trivialize it to illustrate how evolved we truly, truly are.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I remember seeing it on billboards on the way to the beach as a kid.
Meant nothing to me except yay were on the way to the beach!