Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScientific American: More guns do not stop crime
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/more-guns-do-not-stop-more-crimes-evidence-shows/...."Is there truth to this claim? An ideal experiment would be an interventional study in which scientists would track what happened for several years after guns were given to gun-free communities and everything else was kept the same. But alas, there are no gun-free U.S. communities, and the ethics of doing such a study are dubious. So instead scientists compare what happens to gun-toting people, in gun-dense regions, with what happens to people and places with few firearms. They also study whether crime victims are more or less likely to own guns than others, and they track what transpires when laws make it easier for people to carry guns or use them for self-defense.
Most of this researchand there have been several dozen peer-reviewed studiespunctures the idea that guns stop violence. In a 2015 study using data from the FBI and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for example, researchers at Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard University reported that firearm assaults were 6.8 times more common in the states with the most guns versus those with the least. Also in 2015 a combined analysis of 15 different studies found that people who had access to firearms at home were nearly twice as likely to be murdered as people who did not.
This evidence has been slow to accumulate because of restrictions placed by Congress on one of the country's biggest injury research funders, the CDC. Since the mid-1990s the agency has been effectively blocked from supporting gun violence research. And the NRA and many gun owners have emphasized a small handful of studies that point the other way.
(Much more at link)
.......
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 677 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scientific American: More guns do not stop crime (Original Post)
Tanuki
Feb 2018
OP
SHRED
(28,136 posts)1. And water is wet
nolabear
(41,987 posts)2. Pfft...typical elite media.
Elite facts. Elite physics. Elite compassion.
underpants
(182,844 posts)4. Legacy media
As gun girl saifbthe other day.
Botany
(70,525 posts)3. the NRA/gop have been blocking this kind of research for years because the know the results ....
... already. more guns = more gun deaths
"Also in 2015 a combined analysis of 15 different studies found that people who had access to firearms at home were nearly twice as likely to be murdered as people who did not."
dalton99a
(81,534 posts)5. Well, Scientific American is not an NRA-approved publication
It is not EPA-approved either.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)6. But the study defies "reason"
The problem isn't too many gun nuts, it's not enough gun nuts. The only thing that will keep us safe from the gun nuts are more gun nuts.
DemocracyMouse
(2,275 posts)7. Go science! Go logic! Boring but true!
duforsure
(11,885 posts)8. Evidence based truths
for these people are worthless after they've been propagandized to believe the opposite from trump and the NRA.