Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flotsam

(3,268 posts)
Fri Feb 23, 2018, 05:13 PM Feb 2018

Which is more objectionable

In New Hampshire open carry has been legal for a while but until recently concealed carry required a permit. Now concealed carry is a universal right. Do you object more to one or the other or are both okay?

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which is more objectionable (Original Post) flotsam Feb 2018 OP
I object to both. meadowlander Feb 2018 #1
Okay flotsam Feb 2018 #2
Why would it? meadowlander Feb 2018 #3
You assume my proffession flotsam Feb 2018 #4

flotsam

(3,268 posts)
2. Okay
Fri Feb 23, 2018, 05:20 PM
Feb 2018

I have a still valid concealed carry permit under the old laws. I t was granted because I occasionally carry cash-does that change your mind?

meadowlander

(4,399 posts)
3. Why would it?
Fri Feb 23, 2018, 05:24 PM
Feb 2018

Nowhere else in the world does "I'm a bookkeeper" justify "I need to carry a concealed gun".

The concealed carry law makes it easier for people to rob you because it means criminals can carry guns more easily. It also makes it easier for them to steal your gun and use it against you.

flotsam

(3,268 posts)
4. You assume my proffession
Fri Feb 23, 2018, 05:36 PM
Feb 2018

You are wrong.
You assume criminals apply for concealed carry.
You are wrong.
You assume my level of proficiency.
You are wrong.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Which is more objectionab...