Vox: The Democratic rebuttal to the Nunes memo tears it apart
While Trump insists that the Democratic memo somehow vindicates him, it is helpful to actually read it to see just how wrong Trump is.
https://www.vox.com/world/2018/2/24/17048936/democrat-rebuttal-nunes-schiff-memo
Late on Saturday afternoon, House Democrats surprised the country by releasing their rebuttal to the so-called Nunes memo the document, prepared by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), that has become a key part of the conservative argument that the FBI is biased against President Donald Trump. The Democrats rebuttal memo, written by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), argues that the Nunes memo is full of distortions and misrepresentations that dont stand up to scrutiny based on the underlying classified evidence.
Having now read both memos, I can say with confidence: Schiff makes his case. Schiff quotes key FBI documents that explicitly contradict the Nunes memos core arguments. Any fair-minded observer who reads these two documents side-by-side can only conclude one thing: Nunes is either deeply misinformed or straight-up lying. This is a pretty thorough demolition, Julian Sanchez, an expert on surveillance at the libertarian Cato Institute, wrote on Twitter after reading Schiffs memo.
* * *
Schiff quotes a lengthy passage from the actual application the FBI sent to the FISA court asking for permission to snoop on Page. In the key line, the application explicitly notes that the FBI speculates that Steele had been hired to find information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1s [Trumps] campaign.
Thats it. Thats the ballgame. The FBI clearly states right there in the FISA application that they believe Steele was hired to find dirt on Trump. Since the core contention of the Nunes memo is that the FBI didnt do that, Nuness entire argument falls apart.