The Supreme Courts conservatives prepare to hobble public sector unions as a gift to the GOP.
The Constitution Has Nothing to Do With It
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/02/the-supreme-courts-conservatives-prepare-to-hobble-public-sector-unions-as-a-gift-to-the-gop.html
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Janus v. AFSCME, a case designed to let the courts five Republican appointees kneecap the Democratic Party. Everything about Janus reeks of illegitimacy. The legal claim is laughable, the outcome preordained; even the ostensible plaintiff, Mark Janus, is a puppet. At a recent event, Janus revealed that he does not understand the case at all and in fact supports collective bargaining but incorrectly thinks his union fees are supporting political campaigns. His lawyers seem to have lied to himmuch like the court will soon lie to us in proclaiming that the First Amendment somehow prohibits the agency fees at issue in this case. Dont believe it. The conservative justices can dress up their gibberish in whatever legalese they wish. The reality will remain that Janus is a partisan vehicle designed to serve partisan goals, carried across the finish line by five justices who might as well admit that the Constitution has nothing to do with it.
The background of this deeply cynical case is straightforward. In 1977, the Supreme Court rejected the exact argument being made in Janus. Its decision, Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, involved a virtually identical challenge to agency fees in public sector unions as compelled political speech. These dues, also known as fair share fees, support the cost of collective bargaining. Unions are prohibited from using this money to support political activity, like campaigns and candidate contributions. The Abood court found that these feesmeant to prevent free riders from benefiting from union negotiations without having to subsidize themdo not violate the First Amendment, because they do not compel political speech.