General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrumps DOJ goes after WI county for pushing nurse asst to get flu shot against 'sincerely held...
Trumps DOJ goes after WI county for pushing nurse asst to get flu shot against her sincerely held Christian beliefNOOR AL-SIBAI
07 MAR 2018 AT 17:39 ET
The Trump Justice Department is suing Wisconsins Ozaukee County for alleged civil rights violations after requiring a worker at a county-run nursing home to get a flu shot an action she said is against her religious beliefs.
Christian Post reported Wednesday that nursing assistant Barnell Williams, who worked Lasata Care Center in a town roughly 26 miles north of Milwaukee, spoke with her highest-ranking supervisor about getting a religious exemption for a policy requiring employees to get flu shots.
Under the nursing homes then policy, the Christian Post noted, an employees failure to receive the mandatory shot without a formal religious or medical exemption, was deemed a voluntary resignation.'
Based on her interpretation of the Bible, Williams told Campus Administrator Ralph Luedtke it was her sincerely held Christian beliefs that she could not put certain foreign substances, including vaccinations, in her body because it is a Holy Temple.'
The administrator told Williams shed need a signed letter from her pastor attesting to that belief, and when she explained that she was unaffiliated with any church, Luedtke gave her an ultimatum get the shot or consider this your last day.
Williams acquiesced and got the shot, but immediately became emotionally distraught and cried uncontrollably in the aftermath, the DOJs lawsuit claims.
more
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/trumps-doj-goes-wisconsin-county-pushing-nurse-assistant-get-flu-shot-sincerely-held-christian-belief/
rurallib
(62,416 posts)spread by religious crazies who refuse to get vaccinated.
The back up to that is climatic disasters caused by global warming.
Our government under Republicans ensuring our safety.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)If an individual can claim a religious exemption without membership in a religious organization, there is no end to the mischief that people will seek to put beyond the reach of the law, civic obligation, or plain common sense. I hope the judge bounces this bullshit out of the court so hard it lands in Lake Huron.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)further on this case, "membership in a religious organization" should have no relevance as this is about the safety and well being of people in this nurse's care...
Republican 'leadership' is going to kill us all
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Caution, employees may not all be vaccinated against measles, polio, flu etc. Enter at your own risk.
d_r
(6,907 posts)about all my sincerely and deeply held religious beliefs!
Ms. Toad
(34,073 posts)for a free exercise of religion claim. Insisting on membership in a religious organization as a first amendment litmus test would be worse. There were many conscientious objectors during the Vietnam (and other) wars who held religious beliefs that prohibited participation in the military - but who were not members of a specific religion. It was challenging enough to obtain CO status because of the suspicion of people who were not formally affiliated with one of the peace churches; demanding formal membership would be worse.
That said, generally applicable laws that don't target religious beliefs are typically enforceable.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)We already have the template
Gothmog
(145,264 posts)In other words, trump is an idiot
VMA131Marine
(4,139 posts)Especially when one of the rational requirements of the job is in conflict with their beliefs. Healthcare workers need to get vaccinated for what I think are obvious reasons. If a person is not on board with that they need to find a different line of work that is not in conflict with their beliefs.
That said, the County is going to lose this case because they tried to make a distinction between belonging to a church or not to determine if the beliefs are sincerely held. There should have been no exemption at all.
MiniMe
(21,716 posts)The ones who won't fill birth control prescriptions or the morning after pill, if you can't do your job, which is not to be a doctor, then find another line of work
Freethinker65
(10,021 posts)Did this "nursing assistant" have any previous training or certification?
Putting an entire nursing home, with many immunosurpressed and elderly patients, at risk to appease some unqualified science-denier is a preventable insane public health nightmare.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Post removed
flotsam
(3,268 posts)You may change your mind if your flu progresses to pneumonia and cardiac conditions. That's when my position changed...
Ms. Toad
(34,073 posts)Pretty much all data that relies on human reporting is a collection of anecdotes (i.e. plural anecdotes).
As relevant to this discussion, all of the data on potential vaccine side effects consists of anecdotes - dutifully reported to the doctor who gave the vaccination or the CDC, them compiled. Any retroactive study (smoking in relation to cancer, for example) relies on plural anecdotes about how many packs a day one smoked years before one got cancer. The mood information gathered by the Mass General doctors in the study my daughter participated in to assess quality of life changes in response to the test drug consisted of a collection of anecdotes about how she felt on a particular day.
The value of such data is certainly up for potential criticism - the data set (number of anecdotes) may be too small, too distant (gathered years after the fact), unreliably gathered (the sampling was not random), etc. But a cute saying that the plural of anecdote is not data doesn't actually make it "not data."
Raven
(13,891 posts)am 72 and have some respiratory problems. People who haven't received a flu shot are not welcome around me.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)You are getting the flu 25 to 33 percent of the years. The average yearly protection would make that rate unlikely.
The flu has been deadly this year, especially for the elderly and children. How would you feel if you got the flu and survived because of your strong health, but you knew it was possible that YOU were the one that gave it to someone around you who was less healthy and they either died or suffered life changing consequences?
One reasons vaccines cut the number of people that get the disease is because enough people have been vaccinated that epidemics don't happen. This is often called herd immunity.
maxrandb
(15,330 posts)their response to causing an innocent unnecessary pain, suffering and even death, would be; "sucks to be you".
For example, you can see Retrumplicans response to:
- Sensible Gun Control
- ICE raids at the elementary school
- DACA
- Trade Wars
and most especially...their vote and support for Donnie "Fucking" Short Fingers
Deplorable is too nice a fucking word to use for these utter pricks and assholes. Hopefully, this sick, demented, "waste of human skin" would only get "like minded" Donnie Dick Suckers sick.
longship
(40,416 posts)It should be a condition of employment.
No vaccination? No job!
Hekate
(90,690 posts)...and death by pneumonia that comes after the flu.
If the nursing assistant's "sincerely held Christian beliefs" forbid her from performing the essential requirements of her job, she should have to find a new job.
She can "cry uncontrollably" all she wants -- she can also stay home and kill her own grandparents by infecting them with a preventable disease. She's an idiot.
The idea that the DOJ is taking her side is disgusting beyond words.
struggle4progress
(118,285 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,044 posts)If the body is a "holy temple" wouldn't that belief impel one to get the shot in order to properly maintain that temple?
Just hoping you won't get sick is consistent with "holy temple", how?