Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 12:29 PM Mar 2018

Can Team Trump Stop Stormy Daniels' '60 Minutes' Interview?

Trump and his lawyers have not yet filed a lawsuit against CBS over its Stormy Daniels interview. Leading lawyers say it would be pointless, and counterproductive, to do so.

LLOYD GROVE
03.15.18 5:19 AM ET

As Donald Trump’s presidency relentlessly demonstrates, there’s no business like reality-show business.

The tabloid-ready squabbling between lawyers representing porn star Stormy Daniels and Trump’s faithful acolyte Michael Cohen—featuring an anonymously sourced lawsuit threat against CBS News’ 60 Minutes and even cameo appearances by White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Bubba the Love Sponge Clem—has predictably mesmerized the mainstream media.

How could it not? After all, Trump’s alleged fling more than a decade ago with a busty blonde adult film actress has metastasized into a solemn discussion of potential election-law violations and First Amendment protections for the Fourth Estate, as Daniels (real name: Stephanie Clifford) pursues a sensational lawsuit against the president to invalidate a nondisclosure agreement concerning her claim of sexual relations with the then-star of NBC’s The Apprentice (PDF).

“The Trump model of ‘just deny and attempt to make these women out to be liars’ is not very effective as a legal strategy in this day and age,” said Washington attorney Joseph Cammarata, one of the lawyers who represented Paula Jones in her 1994 sexual harassment lawsuit against Bill Clinton—which ultimately resulted in the 42nd president’s impeachment.

“You’ve got defamation claims available, courts that are receptive to claims against the president of the United States for unofficial business, and a skeptical public,” Cammarata added. “The more you peel back the onion, the worse it gets. At some point there may be an opportunity to depose Mr. Trump, and he’s going to have a tough time dealing with all this stuff.”

Media lawyer Charles Glasser, meanwhile, said about the spicy melodrama involving the president and his minions: “This whole thing is a trough of slop, and every pig who thinks he’s got a meal coming is running to the trough.”

more
https://www.thedailybeast.com/can-team-trump-stop-stormy-daniels-60-minutes-interview?ref=home

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can Team Trump Stop Stormy Daniels' '60 Minutes' Interview? (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2018 OP
Steele and Stormy can expose chief traitor to be a degenerate, liar, pile of shit. Eliot Rosewater Mar 2018 #1
They can try. It's up to CBS, really. MineralMan Mar 2018 #2
Maybe DBoon Mar 2018 #3
Horse's head roscoeroscoe Mar 2018 #9
This is Trump we are talking about DBoon Mar 2018 #11
Nice roscoeroscoe Mar 2018 #12
They really have no right to gag the media. unblock Mar 2018 #4
And the handlers, at least, realize that taking public notice of her is a losing play. Orsino Mar 2018 #13
It is all up to CBS, Wellstone ruled Mar 2018 #5
CBS must be loving it, All that free advertising equals high ratings, patricia92243 Mar 2018 #6
pump up the hype and anticipation before release for maximum effect. -nt poboy2 Mar 2018 #14
"Pointless AND counterproductive"?? SeattleVet Mar 2018 #7
I agree gratuitous Mar 2018 #8
Nope. Prior restraint is unconstitutional. And the agreement is not binding on 60 Minutes. yellowcanine Mar 2018 #10

Eliot Rosewater

(31,112 posts)
1. Steele and Stormy can expose chief traitor to be a degenerate, liar, pile of shit.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 12:31 PM
Mar 2018

Nothing legal will come from Stormy I assume other than he is blackmail-able obviously.

GOP christian voters dont care if chief traitor orders the deaths of millions, as long as he does away with abortion.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
2. They can try. It's up to CBS, really.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 12:33 PM
Mar 2018

Prior restraint is a violation of the 1st Amendment. CBS must decide whether or not it will be restrained.

I suggest they decide to air this interview. I hope they do.

DBoon

(22,370 posts)
3. Maybe
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 12:36 PM
Mar 2018

If a CBS executive has a mysterious fall from a hotel window, that might be enough pressure.

A nerve gas agent would also do the job.

I wish I was just being sarcastic, but reality has gotten very ugly

unblock

(52,257 posts)
4. They really have no right to gag the media.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 12:45 PM
Mar 2018

They can make stormy pay, perhaps, if they care to sue and acknowledge that Donnie is a party to the contract and that the information divulged was the confidential information contemplated in the contract.

Not clear Donnie will do even that, but even if he did, it would be after 60 minutes aired it.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
13. And the handlers, at least, realize that taking public notice of her is a losing play.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 01:45 PM
Mar 2018

No doubt the Toddler-in-Chief is yelling about it, but I think we won't see any attempt at a debarring.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
5. It is all up to CBS,
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 12:52 PM
Mar 2018

we have only what happened to Dan Rather as a Example of Political Pressure can bare. Again,we are seeing how free advertising of the Trump Campaign might or might play out at a later time.

SeattleVet

(5,477 posts)
7. "Pointless AND counterproductive"??
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 12:59 PM
Mar 2018

Why, then of COURSE they'll do it.

Most of the rest of the crap they do is either pointless OR counterproductive, but this is a rare chance to get both in one package, so they get a 'two-fer'.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
8. I agree
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 01:05 PM
Mar 2018

In addition to the pointless and counterproductive exacta, Trump gets the trifecta of complaining about liberal or crooked judges ruling against him just because of the judge's slavish devotion to the law.

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
10. Nope. Prior restraint is unconstitutional. And the agreement is not binding on 60 Minutes.
Thu Mar 15, 2018, 01:17 PM
Mar 2018

Trump's only recourse is to convince Daniels not to do the interview. They can sue her afterward for breaking the contract if they wish but they cannot stop the interview if she wants to do it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can Team Trump Stop Storm...