General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlabama Sheriff Legally Took $750,000 Meant To Feed Inmates, Bought Beach House
Thief! Thief!! Thief!! Damn shame!!!!
A sheriff in Alabama took home as personal profit more than $750,000 that was budgeted to feed jail inmates and then purchased a $740,000 beach house, a reporter at The Birmingham News found.
And it's perfectly legal in Alabama, according to state law and local officials.
Alabama has a Depression-era law that allows sheriffs to "keep and retain" unspent money from jail food-provision accounts. Sheriffs across the state take excess money as personal income and, in the event of a shortfall, are personally liable for covering the gap.
Etowah County Sheriff Todd Entrekin told the News that he follows that practice of taking extra money from the fund, saying, "The law says it's a personal account and that's the way I've always done it."
Sheriffs across the state do the same thing and have for decades. But the scale of the practice is not clear: "It is presently unknown how much money sheriffs across the state have taken because most do not report it as income on state financial disclosure forms," the Southern Center for Human Rights wrote in January.
But in Etowah County, the News found the paper trail.
'Following the letter of the law'
The News discovered the eye-popping figures on ethics disclosures that Entrekin sent to the state: Over the course of three years, he received more than $750,000 in extra compensation from "Food Provisions." The exact amount over $750,000 is unclear, because Entrekin was not required to specify above a $250,000 a year threshold, the paper writes.
The paper also found that Entrekin and his wife own several properties worth a combined $1.7 million, including a $740,000 four-bedroom house in Orange Beach, Ala., purchased in September.
Without the provision funds, Entrekin earns a little more than $93,000 a year, the paper says.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/03/14/593204274/alabama-sheriff-legally-took-750-000-meant-to-feed-inmates-bought-beach-house
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Who came up with that crazy law. It could only breed corruption!
DrDan
(20,411 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)dameatball
(7,400 posts)Initech
(100,104 posts)If you have a house full of shoes, you're a hoarder.
If you have a giant storage shed full of dolls, you're a hoarder.
If you have more wealth than an entire city combined, you're not a hoarder, you're a "job creator".
Something is wrong with this picture.
dameatball
(7,400 posts)GitRDun
(1,846 posts)Where is the press? Decades? Really?
I'm starting to think we are a nation of complete fucking morons...
Initech
(100,104 posts)Mosby
(16,359 posts)bluestarone
(17,043 posts)It's total BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where are the fucking people there?????
procon
(15,805 posts)Rotten, spoiled food? Cheap, empty carbs, little protein, no fresh produce, no balanced, healthy diet, that's for sure.
Since when id $93K considered chump change, especially in Alabama where the per capita income is $26K? That sheriff is a man without honor, a wealthy man, a crook, and he's not only stealing from prisoners, but the taxpayers as well. Until the legislature end the corruption and thievery, he should eat the exact same food that he serves in his jails.
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)due to poor nutrition? Maybe there could be a class action lawsuit here.
errant boy
(69 posts)No, just green.
radical noodle
(8,013 posts)If they have income from the account but do not report it, aren't they committing tax fraud?