Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 05:45 PM Jul 2012

Mitt’s Insults, Mistakes, and Blunders Abroad aren’t Gaffes. They Represent his True Worldview

The thing that Krauthammer doesn’t get is that Romney is not the sort of businessman—that his brand of capitalism is not the sort of enterprise—that requires even the most elementary understanding of diplomacy, courtesy, or sensitivity to other people’s values, lives, or perceptions.

The American capitalists-turned-statesmen of an earlier generation—Douglas Dillon, Averell Harriman, Robert Lovett, John McCloy, Dean Acheson, Paul Nitze—took risks, built institutions, helped rebuild postwar Europe, befriended their foreign counterparts: in short, they cultivated an internationalist sensibility at their core. Whatever you think of their politics or Cold War policies generally (and there is much to criticize), financiers formed an American political elite in that era because finance (through the Marshall Plan, the World Bank, the IMF, and so forth) was so often the vehicle of American expansionism.

By contrast, private-equity firms, such as Bain Capital, where Romney made his fortune, tend to view their client companies as cash cows, susceptible to cookie-cutter formulas from which the firms’ partners reap lavish fees, almost regardless of the outcome. Their ends and means breed an insularity, a sense of entitlement, a disposition to view all the world’s entities through a single prism and to appraise them along a single scale.

How Romney should have behaved in London may have been obvious to Charles Krauthammer, who studies politics; it would have been obvious to politically ambitious businessmen from more traditional lines of work or from an earlier era. But as we have been graced to see this week, it is not necessarily obvious to Romney himself.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2012/07/mitt_romney_s_insults_and_mistakes_while_at_the_london_olympics_aren_t_gaffes_as_much_as_a_fair_representation_of_his_worldview_.html
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt’s Insults, Mistakes, and Blunders Abroad aren’t Gaffes. They Represent his True Worldview (Original Post) phantom power Jul 2012 OP
It is sad but true. liberal N proud Jul 2012 #1
I assumed he was pandering to his jingoistic base Poiuyt Jul 2012 #2
I've been saying all along thelordofhell Jul 2012 #3
+1,000 freshwest Jul 2012 #5
Spot-on analysis of der Mittens' indepat Jul 2012 #4

thelordofhell

(4,569 posts)
3. I've been saying all along
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 05:50 PM
Jul 2012

That Rmoney's unique business experience is the complete opposite of what a President should be. A President nutures and cares for their country, at Bain you only cared about the money.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
5. +1,000
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 06:09 PM
Jul 2012
Focusing your life solely on making a buck shows a certain poverty of ambition. It asks too little of yourself. Because it's only when you hitch your wagon to something larger than yourself that you realize your true potential. ~ Barack Obama

I've always felt this way. Mitt might be pitied for having given up his humanity, but he's become a danger to the rest of us.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
4. Spot-on analysis of der Mittens'
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 05:54 PM
Jul 2012

worldview: he doesn't know better and doesn't care imo, for he intends to cram his worldview in our faces.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitt’s Insults, Mistakes,...