Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Initech

(100,080 posts)
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 12:10 AM Apr 2018

It's time to unmask Q. Who do you think Q / QAnon really is?

Honestly if I were a betting man, I would bet high dollars and good odds that it's Roger Stone. No one has had a grudge against Hillary Clinton more than that asshole, and the thought of him making up bullshit about Hillary Clinton running a pedophile ring is so immature that I would immediately suspect he's the one behind it. But I wouldn't rule out Alex Jones or Jerome Corsi either. One of those assholes is Q. It's time to pull a Scooby Doo, take off the mask and show us all who you really are. Anyone else want to guess who Q is?

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's time to unmask Q. Who do you think Q / QAnon really is? (Original Post) Initech Apr 2018 OP
I doubt it's anyone famous... alwaysinflux Apr 2018 #1
Lol. Like who I suggested blake2012 Apr 2018 #3
Let's not forget that Roger Stone did make a career out of hating Hillary Clinton. Initech Apr 2018 #4
Taking out a president is "crap"? Because that IS Hortensis Apr 2018 #7
"Q"/"QAnon" didn't take out a president. They didn't turn up until the 2nd half of last year muriel_volestrangler Apr 2018 #12
And now that this bullshit is trying to be turned into legitimate news... Initech Apr 2018 #17
No, saying it's someone from the administration is what would make it "legitimate news" muriel_volestrangler Apr 2018 #18
But my beef with this, is this. Initech Apr 2018 #20
It isn't believed by half the country. It may well be spread by bots. muriel_volestrangler Apr 2018 #24
And that's entirely possible. Q could be more than one person operating one account. Initech Apr 2018 #26
Some 800lb college Republican in his moms basement blake2012 Apr 2018 #2
Ben Whishaw Fla_Democrat Apr 2018 #5
You meddling kids. sarcasmo Apr 2018 #6
Could be that POS radical noodle Apr 2018 #8
"Q" is most likely probably someone Berlin Expat Apr 2018 #9
Russia Arazi Apr 2018 #10
I was thinking the same thing. This person is not necessarily American. LonePirate Apr 2018 #27
Why waste time worrying about it Thyla Apr 2018 #11
John de Lancie JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2018 #13
Why does it matter? oberliner Apr 2018 #14
After watching John Oliver last night i think it does matter. Initech Apr 2018 #15
Did he say Sinclair is saying the "Q" stuff might be true? muriel_volestrangler Apr 2018 #19
That's not the take away I got. Initech Apr 2018 #21
Yes, but 'Q' is just some guy on the internet. For you to go after him, you have to be able muriel_volestrangler Apr 2018 #25
... Javaman Apr 2018 #16
I don't think it's Stone or anyone we know in that capacity. It's either some fool who is laughing Kirk Lover Apr 2018 #22
It's got to be someone with media connections though. Initech Apr 2018 #23
Dan Scavino TheUnicorn May 2018 #28

alwaysinflux

(149 posts)
1. I doubt it's anyone famous...
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 12:14 AM
Apr 2018

... because who has time for all that crap? It's someone who has a lot of time on their hands and enjoys stringing all these crazies along.

Initech

(100,080 posts)
4. Let's not forget that Roger Stone did make a career out of hating Hillary Clinton.
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 12:22 AM
Apr 2018

And I'm sure was instrumental in helping rig the election. So there is that.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
7. Taking out a president is "crap"? Because that IS
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 01:22 AM
Apr 2018

what Hillary Clinton was going to be.

She was way out ahead almost the entire race, and she was going to sweep Democrats into at least a majority in the senate on her Democratic Party coattails, and perhaps even take the house. While that was once unthinkable, by fall it was being thought of big time by expert analysts. When she was taken out our coattails collapsed also, and we lost both branches and a huge number of state and local offices.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
12. "Q"/"QAnon" didn't take out a president. They didn't turn up until the 2nd half of last year
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 05:31 AM
Apr 2018

and they just pump out weird messages designed to entice the loons at 4chan into constructing ever more ridiculous conspiracy theories. I don't think they posted before Trump's stupid "calm before the storm" remark.

That's the 'crap' this thread is about.

Initech

(100,080 posts)
17. And now that this bullshit is trying to be turned into legitimate news...
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 09:21 AM
Apr 2018

It's time to stop it. Let's find out who Q really is and hopefully we can stop the bullshit.

That's why i think it's someone involved with the Trump administration - someone who can stir the crazies while remaining anonymous. I wouldn't be surprised if it was Julian Assange either. That dude does have a wifi connection, a hatred of Hillary, and a lot of free time on his hands.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
18. No, saying it's someone from the administration is what would make it "legitimate news"
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 10:18 AM
Apr 2018

because then it would be an actual disinformation operation. "Someone who can stir the crazies while remaining anonymous" means "anyone". Anyone can post BS on 4chan and get them to believe it. Saying "we must find out who this is" gives them too much credit. They are not posting anything real, so there is no need to assume there is any connection with any known person.

Initech

(100,080 posts)
20. But my beef with this, is this.
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 10:32 AM
Apr 2018

It's true that any jackass can post shit anonymously on any message board. But conspiracy theories don't favor us, and this is true. But how does something like "The Storm" not only get believed, but passed around enough to gain media traction?

There's someone on 4chan with media connections that is getting this crap spread around. Conspiracy theories don't just pop up on a message board, and then all of a sudden you have half the country believing it, no matter how baseless. Ive been around the internet enough to know that it doesn't work that way.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
24. It isn't believed by half the country. It may well be spread by bots.
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 12:01 PM
Apr 2018

It's the kind of thing a bot network is good at spreading - just repeating any old thing. 4chan was known for expertise in using bots long before Russia was - look at this from 9 years ago: https://techcrunch.com/2009/04/21/4chan-takes-over-the-time-100/

Initech

(100,080 posts)
26. And that's entirely possible. Q could be more than one person operating one account.
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 12:08 PM
Apr 2018

It could be Putin's troll bot army spreading this nonsense. He has found a way to weaponize social media and that is scary.

 

blake2012

(1,294 posts)
2. Some 800lb college Republican in his moms basement
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 12:16 AM
Apr 2018

Who ironically trolls for kids at the local Chucke Cheese.

radical noodle

(8,003 posts)
8. Could be that POS
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 02:30 AM
Apr 2018

dinesh d'souza

There are tons of them out there who make up lies and spread them far and wide.

Berlin Expat

(950 posts)
9. "Q" is most likely probably someone
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 03:16 AM
Apr 2018

we've never heard of - a complete unknown.

The nom de plume this person has chosen is interesting; two meanings immediately spring to mind. "Q" is often used in Christian theological circles to refer to the Q Document, or Quelledokument, a hypothetical original source document for the New Testament's synoptic Gospels of Matthew and Luke. Of course, "Q" is also quite famously the recurring character played by John de Lancie in Star Trek: The Next Generation - and a member of the Q Continuum, a species of extra-dimensional beings who are, by human standards, essentially omnipotent and omniscient.

Personally, I think Q is simply a deeply disturbed conspiracy theorist who just came along at the right place at the right time and is probably privately reveling in his - or her - anonymous fame.

That's just my take on it.....your mileage may vary.

LonePirate

(13,424 posts)
27. I was thinking the same thing. This person is not necessarily American.
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 12:20 PM
Apr 2018

Plus this smells a lot like a Russian disinformation campaign. I could be wrong, though.

Thyla

(791 posts)
11. Why waste time worrying about it
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 05:23 AM
Apr 2018

It's a FRW larp, likely it is a bunch of nuts pissed that stormfront had to go underground.

Initech

(100,080 posts)
15. After watching John Oliver last night i think it does matter.
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 09:10 AM
Apr 2018

Because Sinclair is trying to pass off the Trump conspiracy theory bullshit as legitimate news and is forcing nearly all of their stations to report this crap. I think if we pull the mask off who Q really is, it would delegitimize "The Storm", Pizzagate, and all of the other shit we've been forced to put up with.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
19. Did he say Sinclair is saying the "Q" stuff might be true?
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 10:26 AM
Apr 2018

Anyway, I don't see how you are going to be able to get any evidence on who 'Q' is. You don't run 4chan or an ISP, so you're not going to have the necessary IP addresses. You don't have the power to unmask all users of the internet.

Initech

(100,080 posts)
21. That's not the take away I got.
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 10:44 AM
Apr 2018

What John Oliver was saying that Sinclair forces its' stations to report on certain issues. And they are trying to normalize the conspiracy theory bullshit by reporting on "The Storm" and other nonsense.

I think if we cut the bullshit off at the source, it would stop media outlets like Sinclair from trying to normalize it. And I'm not saying out all of the internet, just whoever Q is.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
25. Yes, but 'Q' is just some guy on the internet. For you to go after him, you have to be able
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 12:06 PM
Apr 2018

to go after anyone on the internet.

If you see TV stations trying to report on "The Storm" as anything other than stupid conspiracy theory, then go after the stations. Because you know who they are, and they want to have a reputation as believable news outlets, so that companies advertise with them. But you are unable to shut down 4chan, so it's pointless you wishing that you could.

 

Kirk Lover

(3,608 posts)
22. I don't think it's Stone or anyone we know in that capacity. It's either some fool who is laughing
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 10:50 AM
Apr 2018

at how easily manipulated his subjects are OR it could be more nefarious.

All I know is that there is a steady stream of conspiracy bullshit being pumped out by that 4Chan cesspool.

Initech

(100,080 posts)
23. It's got to be someone with media connections though.
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 10:54 AM
Apr 2018

Anyone can create shit like "The Storm" but getting half the country to believe it? I know Trump supporters will believe just about anything but this? The only way is if Q was a media insider or even a White House insider.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's time to unmask Q. Wh...