Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Question for the lawyers on DU....WTF (Original Post) pbmus Apr 2018 OP
Of Course They Did dlk Apr 2018 #1
I very much enjoy hearing opinions from real lawyers on DU Skittles Apr 2018 #2
Have to hear pros and cons first, elleng Apr 2018 #3
Heres the brief jberryhill Apr 2018 #10
This was expected. The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2018 #4
Heres the filing, incidentally jberryhill Apr 2018 #9
Arbitration agreements are becoming quite common in contracts. TomSlick Apr 2018 #5
Thanks for your understanding... pbmus Apr 2018 #7
I assume there is an arbitration clause in the contract HopeAgain Apr 2018 #6
Could you be more specific? jberryhill Apr 2018 #8

elleng

(130,911 posts)
3. Have to hear pros and cons first,
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 10:12 PM
Apr 2018

but I'm betting the argument against private arbitration prevails.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,705 posts)
4. This was expected.
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 10:14 PM
Apr 2018

The judge that denied Avenatti's request to take Trump's deposition, as I understand it, because of a procedural rule requiring a request for arbitration to be filed by Cohen first. Now that this has been done Avenatti can ask again. The contract contains an arbitration clause, but Avenatti claims the whole contract is invalid so that clause doesn't apply, but now that Cohen has requested arbitration, I think that makes it possible to go ahead and litigate the question of the validity of the contract.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. Heres the filing, incidentally
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 11:34 PM
Apr 2018
https://t.co/A5ZQ81ZACp

The basic upshot is that Daniels does not dispute that she agreed to arbitration, and that all of the other issues should be resolved in arbitration.

TomSlick

(11,098 posts)
5. Arbitration agreements are becoming quite common in contracts.
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 10:14 PM
Apr 2018

Republican legislation on the national level favors arbitration agreements and the federal law preempts state law protections of jury trials.

If you will take the time to read the "fine print" in many contracts - both on paper and on-line - they contain arbitration agreements. These agreements tend to be very one-sided with the party proffering the contract given the power to select the arbitrator. As a rule, consumers find that arbitration is not financially viable.

When there is a Democratic majority in Congress, this wants attention.

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
6. I assume there is an arbitration clause in the contract
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 10:35 PM
Apr 2018

I'm not sure what the question is. Would have been shocked had they not filed this.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
8. Could you be more specific?
Mon Apr 2, 2018, 11:32 PM
Apr 2018

Like, have you actually looked at the contract she signed with the advice of counsel?

Here’s Cohen’s filing. What part of it is confusing?

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4429429/4-2-18-Essential-Consultant-Motion-to-Compel.pdf
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question for the lawyers ...