Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

riversedge

(70,238 posts) Tue Apr 3, 2018, 12:21 PM Apr 2018

god! Lewindowki is ragging on and on On Mitchell Report. Why does msnbc allow this cooky man on TV?

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

god! Lewindowki is ragging on and on On Mitchell Report. Why does msnbc allow this cooky man on TV? (Original Post) riversedge Apr 2018 OP

Ms. Greenspan loves to give the Rs a 'fair shake' (she loves them). -nt poboy2 Apr 2018 #1

THIS!!!!! SoCalMusicLover Apr 2018 #4

FOX bleeds to CNN and now sadly, MSNBC... jodymarie aimee Apr 2018 #2

If you're not making a rhetorical statement, then here's my guess why: no_hypocrisy Apr 2018 #3

Ratings? FarCenter Apr 2018 #5

poboy2

(2,078 posts)

1. Ms. Greenspan loves to give the Rs a 'fair shake' (she loves them). -nt

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 12:24 PM

Apr 2018

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)

4. THIS!!!!!

Reply to poboy2 (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 12:41 PM

Apr 2018

jodymarie aimee

(3,975 posts)

2. FOX bleeds to CNN and now sadly, MSNBC...

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 12:25 PM

Apr 2018

it is all MONEY.

no_hypocrisy

(46,116 posts)

3. If you're not making a rhetorical statement, then here's my guess why:

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 12:35 PM

Apr 2018

CNN kind of hopes that when a Trumper starts ranting (like Sam Nunberg), he might disclose something unknown heretofore. Like a good cross examination eliciting hidden information.

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)

5. Ratings?

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Tue Apr 3, 2018, 12:55 PM

Apr 2018

Reply to this discussion