Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 12:40 PM Apr 2018

If Scott Pruitt were to replace Jeff Sessions, would he hesitate to fire Robert Mueller...?

...and attempt to shut down the investigation?

If he could get confirmed by the Senate, I have little doubt but that he would try.

Would he be successful? Perhaps?

But, I suspect that he would get a little opposition from the Republicans, and he would be very difficult to confirm.

I do not doubt but that Trump would like to end the investigation entirely.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,785 posts)
1. The Senate would be FOOLS.....
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 12:44 PM
Apr 2018

to confirm Scott Pruitt as Attorney General given the scandal ridden mess he is in at the moment.

And if they did, Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein would tell Pruitt, "You have no credibility here, you lying POS!"

I can dream.

rsdsharp

(9,177 posts)
2. They don't have to confirm him.
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 12:47 PM
Apr 2018

He was already been confirmed as EPA director. As such Trump can slide him into any other position that requires Senate confirmation for a period of 210 days without new Senate confirmation.

He'd fire Mueller on day one.

kentuck

(111,095 posts)
3. I did not know that!
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 12:51 PM
Apr 2018

That might explain why Mueller and Rosenstein told Trump's lawyers that he was not a "target" in an investigation? If he had replied in the affirmative, he may have been gone today?

MiniMe

(21,716 posts)
4. Since he has been approved as EPA Secretary, he has a bit of time before he has to be confirmed
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 12:52 PM
Apr 2018

I think it is several months. The firing of Mueller would be done day 1

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
5. I predicted this scenario a few times on DU. It is precisely the fact that Pruitt has already been
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 12:54 PM
Apr 2018

Confirmed and can serve as AG for 210 days without further confirmation that I believe don the Con will prove to be very reluctant to give Pruitt the boot.

magicarpet

(14,150 posts)
6. If they dump Sessions and swap in Pruitt....
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 01:01 PM
Apr 2018

.... the November 2018 would be a blow out election loss for the Rethugs big big time.

Do it, do it, please do it. Wait another 60 days to maximize the negative impact it will do on the mid-terms come November.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,912 posts)
14. Maybe. Maybe not
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 01:52 PM
Apr 2018

If somehow Donald Trump, or someone else who thinks the same way he does, had been in Session's shoes I doubt he would have voluntarily recused. Sessions whatever else his faults may be is steeped in Senate tradition. Forces worked on him that may not work on another.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
12. Pruitt has shown a willingness to flaunt rules...
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 01:43 PM
Apr 2018

..do you think the GOP Congress would hold him accountable? I sure don't.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
10. Nope....
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 01:41 PM
Apr 2018

Pruitt is a completely unprincipled tool of the oligarchy. He's willing to destroy the environment to ingratiate himself to monied interests, he's certainly willing to be Trump's hitman.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Scott Pruitt were to r...