General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPenn State says wilderness is too risky for outdoors clubs
AP News:STATE COLLEGE, Pa. (AP) A near-century-old outdoor recreation club will now refrain from going outside because it is too dangerous out in the wilderness, according to officials at Penn State University.
The Penn State Outing Club, originally founded in 1920, announced last week that the university will no longer allow the club to organize outdoor, student-led trips starting next semester. The hiking, camping and other outdoors-focused activities the student-led club has long engaged in are too risky, the universitys offices of Student Affairs and Risk Management determined.
Richard Waltz, the Outing Clubs current president, said that the decision was made by an office that never consulted them.
The decision was based on a two-month review that didnt include consultation with student leaders at any of the clubs deemed too risky, according to students.
Matthew28
(1,798 posts)So nature is now off limits.
Insanity!
Snackshack
(2,541 posts)Understandable.
dalton99a
(81,543 posts)and the grass is unkempt
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Docreed2003
(16,869 posts)But this seems somewhat extreme. If such an outdoors event has sufficient oversight from faculty, I don't see why they would cancel the event.
MissB
(15,810 posts)Where one could actually get eaten in the back country. Or get buried in an avalanche. Where if you have a break between classes you can dash out to the nearby ski place for a few runs. They pretty much live outdoors.
Just bizarre.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)cbreezen
(694 posts)He was in 6th grade. He went with his school. Yes, even special needs kids participate.
This article is an example of the current state of journalism. Hyperbole, at best.
exboyfil
(17,865 posts)They are adults. It is not like they are high school kids. Unlike scholarship football players, the activity is totally voluntary, and they should be able to assess the risks for themselves.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Oh, there are lots and lots of great kids in college. But many are still emotionally dependent on their parents like my generation was in High School. Or Junior high
For years I oversaw a college internship program for my company with around 25 kids. Ironically one I went through 25 years earlier. I was amazed how over time the number of parents calling to complain about some aspect of the program increased. And how incensed they became when told I could not discuss anything with them about any employee. Including their adult child.
When I was an intern it would have humiliated us to the point of quitting had one of our parents called our workplace.
Not saying it is good or bad. But it is a big change.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)left with a one way ticket to somewhere in Europe (I'm old & forgot) Other than the few postcards sent to friends & family, no one saw them for 2 months.. They had Eurail passes and maps & a list of youth hostels..and about $300 between them..
This was summer of '67..
They had a BLAST...showed up in time for college that fall
No cell phones..no ATM cards..
Just traveling by the seat of their pants..
They went to England..France..Italy..Spain..Luxembourg and probably other places too..
They were not robbed..or raped..or assaulted in any way..
on edit..IIRC they did some odd jobs (farm labor) and earned enough to get home..
Kotya
(235 posts)I don't get it.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,111 posts)Liability and the associated insurance is my bet.
lame54
(35,302 posts)rusty fender
(3,428 posts)They need to cancel the football program as well as ice hockey, etc., if a student activity is deemed too dangerous
jalan48
(13,876 posts)Thunderbeast
(3,417 posts)but as a High School freshman, went to the Mt. Hood Wilderness with a friend for a week-long backpack trip. No "adult supervision" required. No lawyers standing at the trailhead asking for a notarized release.
If somebody told me that as a college student, I was too fragile to go for a hike, I would have questioned my choice to attend that school.
Life is not risk free.
I guess young people are supposed to sit on their couch watching reality TV while the last wild areas are pillaged by the oil companies and strip miners!
Orsino
(37,428 posts)hexola
(4,835 posts)When I was kid - I used to think nothing of grabbing my Gazetteer and a walking stick and checking out the various trails on PA State Game lands.
The first time you see a bear - you will think differently.
Center county is also close to areas where you might find some wild boar.
Porcupines. Fishers. Rattlesnakes. Coyotes.
And the maybe even a Nittany Lion!
I wouldn't be out there without a sidearm...or at least a pack of firecrackers!
peggysue2
(10,836 posts)Yup, it is a decision made over liability fears for the school.
Because life can be dangerous!
One of my sons is a wilderness guide. Something like this would make him absolutely gag. Protecting wilderness areas involves being familiar with them, seeing them with your own eyes. What better group than college-age students who are healthy, strong and often passionate? What better way to learn the basics to an outdoor life--short of a family history/interest--than through a group pitched in that direction, offering knowledge and tips on survival and safety?
This decision isn't in the students' interest, those who have a keen curiosity about the wilderness. This is for the bean counters worried about liability claims.
As for being too risky? It's risky to drive a car, too. Or play football. Come on!