General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUnpopular(?) opinion time: I'm okay w/ people mocking SHS's appearance
I generally try to avoid body-shaming and criticizing people based on their appearance (I'm fallible though and I'm sure I do at times, whether on purpose or without realizing it).
But I really don't care if people mock Sarah Huckabee Sanders, be it for her eyes, her weight, her hair, her voice, the way she dresses. I don't care. I've got no f*cks to give. It's no skin off my nose, not a single solitary epidermal cell.
She has chosen to spend her limited days on this earth defending, justifying, excusing, and otherwise shielding from criticism -- including by misdirection or changing the subject -- the most vile, undignified, boorish behavior and language from Trump. Every single thing he says and does she defends and excuses, including exactly this matter: body-shaming, appearance mockery, expressing disgust towards disabilities. He's being doing it for DECADES, and is extraordinarily shameless about it. Now he has not only the biggest stage in the world but an army of enablers like her.
She has forfeited any grounds for complaint, even by ally or proxy. She has staked out the position that this type of thing is not to be criticized or complained about. Well then, she can reap what she has sown. Enjoy. Or choke on it, I don't care. This type of behavior will not be criticized by me when it is aimed at her or other Trumpists.
And when it comes to Trump himself, and his ridiculous combover or gigantic (I-eat-crappy-food-despite-being-rich-enough-to-do-otherwise-and-don't-exercise-despite-having-leisure-time) ass I may even engage in a bit of it myself without regret.
I could be wrong. I might change my mind. But that's my opinion for now.
S.E. TN Liberal
(508 posts)She was not mocked for her appearance or her body.
You should do more checking the facts before making such a claim.
Rorey
(8,445 posts)She wasn't body-shamed or face-shamed at the WHCD, but there have been more than a few here who have done that.
RockRaven
(14,974 posts)A variety of media I consume has done so including TV shows, podcasts, social media posts.
If you want to criticize me about shooting my mouth off before "checking my facts" feel free to do so when warranted --I'm sure I do it often enough; I don't believe this is one such case.
S.E. TN Liberal
(508 posts)I reread your post and see I wrongly assumed it was about the WHCD.
My mistake, and I apologize for my previous reply to you.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)or maybe intentionally not. That was the body shaming joke that I thought was below a level of decency I expect from people I respect or just care to listen to.
Was not impressed with the pedophile joke because I know survivors whose lives were ruined by it.
Rorey
(8,445 posts)But I can understand why some might. Given that she defends the worst offender I've ever seen, I think she should realize that some of that might come her way too. If her skin is that thin, she's in the wrong line of work.
blogslut
(38,002 posts)She said that SHS burns facts and uses the ash to create a perfect smoky eye.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,204 posts)I'm one of them. When I first heard the joke I thought Michelle said "Sanders burns fat and uses the ash to create the perfect smokey eye." and I thought "Huh?"
Thekaspervote
(32,778 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)Its not just them you are mocking or shaming or potentially making feel bad/worthless. I think that kind of body/appearance shaming is hurtful, and it has *nothing* to do with whether that particular target is a good person. SHS is a pos and danger to our Democracy for reasons that are far more important than what she looks like. The comments at the WHCD were much more on point than a fat joke would have been.
deurbano
(2,895 posts)Although I'm okay mocking (mockable) things people choose to do appearance-wsie... like spraying their supposedly superior white skin orange.
jimmy2.0
(13 posts)Marie Osmond ate Ernest Borgnine.
blue cat
(2,415 posts)Too funny!
S.E. TN Liberal
(508 posts)That is an image I would prefer never enter my mind.
I am guessing a great many around here are too young to know Ernest Borgnine.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)...This is either a bad misinterpretation of Wolfs joke or a criticism meant to curry favor with the Trump administration. Either way, saying that Huckabee Sanders achieves a perfect smokey eye with the ash from burnt facts does not qualify as intense criticism of her physical appearance.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/michelle-wolf-fires-back-at-new-york-times-reporter-maggie-haberman-over-whcd-criticism?ref=wrap
whopis01
(3,514 posts)who assume that any comment about Sanders appearance must be a negative one. They are so convinced that anyone critical of Sanders would attack her appearance that they cant actually understand the joke.
It is truly amazing and says a lot about anyone who thinks this is about her appearance.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)>>Hey mags! All these jokes were about her despicable behavior. Sounds like you have some thoughts about her looks though? 😘
And smokey eyes is a 'thing'
https://www.liveabout.com/how-to-get-smokey-eyes-345640
But they just want to make up what's in thier head as reality to what Wolf was doing
davsand
(13,421 posts)I don't typically go for jabs at people for the physical stuff. In the case of several of the orange anus posse member, however, I do think comments are appropriate. The inner ugly is what we are seeing.
YMMV.
Laura
lame54
(35,295 posts)Bradshaw3
(7,522 posts)Speaking in general.
I admit I often feel the same as the OP.
lame54
(35,295 posts)You can't seperate the too
Nac Mac Feegle
(971 posts)Just. NO.
If you are not an agent provocateur attempting to sow discord, you are badly mistaken.
Do not lower yourself to their level.
Do not become them.
Do not permit them to engage in "The Libs do it."
Someone is only subject to abuse and ridicule for the things they CAN control. Their behaviors, their actions, their words are 'fair game'.
What they cannot control is not subject.
No body shaming, no appearance remarks.
Deeds and words are liable, not looks and shape.
Do not give them any legitimacy to play the victim
Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster... for when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you.
― Friedrich Nietzsche
akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)She is a liar and why she lies for a liar is beyond me. Perhaps, the pay check is her reason to lie. Trump mocked many women, and she is following his pattern. Trump is a fat ass and is inept to be the resident of the White House. He is making sure that the swamp is well attended, the piece a shit!
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)Still a copy of Catcher In The Rye in the local library
TheSmarterDog
(794 posts)And she will endlessly defend those attacks every day. She's fair game.
treestar
(82,383 posts)exists that should not be broken. I hate purism. No one should feel sorry for her after the things she has said, nor for the Dotard. They understand nothing else. If you don't push back, they consider you weak. And they wouldn't use that language, it would be "pussy" or "coward" or something else insulting.
IronLionZion
(45,462 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Shes a homophobic, racist liar. I wish nothing but suffering on her and her pig father.
Her face screams Can I please speak to your manager???? Fuck her.
Faux pas
(14,681 posts)soul that's ugly.