General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe need an income inequality tax.
We need to reverse the Republican tax reductions to the wealthy and the corporations. Then we need to institute an added tax on the wealthy that are applied as long as the economic conditions of substantial income inequality are in affect. In the age of a global economy and automation, I think that this is the only realistic way that you can reduce the problem of the stagnant middle class.
A more politically advantageous name for it might be a greed tax.
onecaliberal
(32,865 posts)manor321
(3,344 posts)RDANGELO
(3,433 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,383 posts)Exotica
(1,461 posts)would generate enough revenue to pay for everything. There is approximately 5 QUADRILLION USD a year in total financial turnover in the US markets. A turnover tax would greatly reduce the rapacious high frequency trading as well. Estimates have shown a 1% rate would generate at least 5 to 10 trillion usd a year, maybe far more. You could do away with regressive income taxes on the bottom 80%, and fully fund free universal health care and uni tuition.
Plus, the true systemic controllers, the global private banking system and all its other tentacles would finally pay their fair share.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I also wish I understood it a little better.
Thank you for your post.
Exotica
(1,461 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,383 posts)We are more helpful to the one-to-two percent if we are so busy trying to put food on the table we don't have time to think. Oh, and it helps if we believe in God's Will.
PaulX2
(2,032 posts)Problem solved.
safeinOhio
(32,690 posts)I would make it a flat rate of 5% of wealth over $2 million. No deductions and harsh rules on hiding wealth overseas.