Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsProsecutor lied about key evidence in Trump inauguration protester trial, judge rules
Via Charlie Pierce:
The federal prosecutor who has pursued hundreds of Trump inauguration protesters on unprecedented felony riot charges for over a year lied to the court about edits her team made to a key video filmed by right-wing operative James OKeefes organization, a judge found Wednesday.
The ruling does not guarantee that the remaining defendants in the case will go free. Judge Robert Morin agreed with defense lawyers that Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Kerkhoff had illegally suppressed evidence, but declined to make a final ruling on their motion to dismiss all charges in light of the governments cheating. That motion governs only one of several clusters of defendants who may yet land in prison for marching alongside people who broke windows and threw rocks.
The full video captures an undercover police officer saying of organizers from the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), I dont think they know anything about any of the upper echelon stuff. But that moment was edited out of the video before prosecutors turned it over to defense counsel in an earlier case, and was only discovered after the court ordered the government to hand over the full, unedited files.
Withholding a police witnesss in-the-moment statement that organizers had no knowledge of the thing theyre being accused of planning is a clear violation of the laws governing evidence-sharing. Kerkhoff had previously told the court that no potentially exculpatory evidence had been withheld because the videos were only altered to conceal the identities of the police officer and the OKeefe operative. Defense counsel has asked Morin to censure Kerkhoff for that false claim.
https://thinkprogress.org/prosecutors-hid-evidence-that-favors-anti-trump-protesters-judge-rules-5eec98867027/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
The ruling does not guarantee that the remaining defendants in the case will go free. Judge Robert Morin agreed with defense lawyers that Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Kerkhoff had illegally suppressed evidence, but declined to make a final ruling on their motion to dismiss all charges in light of the governments cheating. That motion governs only one of several clusters of defendants who may yet land in prison for marching alongside people who broke windows and threw rocks.
The full video captures an undercover police officer saying of organizers from the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), I dont think they know anything about any of the upper echelon stuff. But that moment was edited out of the video before prosecutors turned it over to defense counsel in an earlier case, and was only discovered after the court ordered the government to hand over the full, unedited files.
Withholding a police witnesss in-the-moment statement that organizers had no knowledge of the thing theyre being accused of planning is a clear violation of the laws governing evidence-sharing. Kerkhoff had previously told the court that no potentially exculpatory evidence had been withheld because the videos were only altered to conceal the identities of the police officer and the OKeefe operative. Defense counsel has asked Morin to censure Kerkhoff for that false claim.
https://thinkprogress.org/prosecutors-hid-evidence-that-favors-anti-trump-protesters-judge-rules-5eec98867027/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1055 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prosecutor lied about key evidence in Trump inauguration protester trial, judge rules (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
May 2018
OP
Fascism chipping away at any vestige of remaining honesty, fairness, and civil rights.
magicarpet
May 2018
#2
Borchkins
(724 posts)1. Holy crap!
Lying to the tribunal. Take her law license.
magicarpet
(14,150 posts)2. Fascism chipping away at any vestige of remaining honesty, fairness, and civil rights.
The King was offended by your actions at the royal ball, off to the dungeons with you - the King never forgives or forgets - but always wields his punishment severely and without regret.
eppur_se_muova
(36,263 posts)3. So ... does this make O'Keefe complicit to a conspiracy ?
Would love to see that ratfucker face actual, prison-eligible, criminal charges.