Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama Campaign Sues to Restrict Military Voting
It's Breitbart. Any truth to this? Nothing from anything but right wing sources.
President Barack Obama, along with many Democrats, likes to say that, while they may disagree with the GOP on many issues related to national security, they absolutely share their admiration and dedication to members of our armed forces. Obama, in particular, enjoys being seen visiting troops and having photos taken with members of our military. So, why is his campaign and the Democrat party suing to restrict their ability to vote in the upcoming election?
On July 17th, the Obama for America Campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and the Ohio Democratic Party filed suit in OH to strike down part of that state's law governing voting by members of the military. Their suit said that part of the law is "arbitrary" with "no discernible rational basis."
Currently, Ohio allows the public to vote early in-person up until the Friday before the election. Members of the military are given three extra days to do so. While the Democrats may see this as "arbitrary" and having "no discernible rational basis," I think it is entirely reasonable given the demands on servicemen and women's time and their obligations to their sworn duty.
The National Defense Committee reports:
[f]or each of the last three years, the Department of Defenses Federal Voting Assistance Program has reported to the President and the Congress that the number one reason for military voter disenfranchisement is inadequate time to successfully vote.
more . . . http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/02/obama-campaign-sues-to-restrict-military-voting
On July 17th, the Obama for America Campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and the Ohio Democratic Party filed suit in OH to strike down part of that state's law governing voting by members of the military. Their suit said that part of the law is "arbitrary" with "no discernible rational basis."
Currently, Ohio allows the public to vote early in-person up until the Friday before the election. Members of the military are given three extra days to do so. While the Democrats may see this as "arbitrary" and having "no discernible rational basis," I think it is entirely reasonable given the demands on servicemen and women's time and their obligations to their sworn duty.
The National Defense Committee reports:
[f]or each of the last three years, the Department of Defenses Federal Voting Assistance Program has reported to the President and the Congress that the number one reason for military voter disenfranchisement is inadequate time to successfully vote.
more . . . http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/02/obama-campaign-sues-to-restrict-military-voting
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 4708 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Campaign Sues to Restrict Military Voting (Original Post)
proud2BlibKansan
Aug 2012
OP
Why would anyone think that Democrats would try to block people from voting?
liberal N proud
Aug 2012
#5
Scuba
(53,475 posts)1. This was debunked earlier this morning.
Anything from Breibart is almost certainly a lie.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)3. Is there a link?
My idiot bro in law sent it to me. I'd love to prove him wrong.
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)4. Wall Street Journal
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2012/07/18/obama-campaign-sues-ohio-for-cutting-early-voting-days/
Restore the right. That means they want to strike down the law to allow everyone the full time.
This lawsuit seeks to treat all Ohio citizens equally under the law, Bob Bauer, attorney for President Obamas campaign committee, said. We want to restore the right of all to vote before Election Day, he said, according to the Akron Beacon Journal.
The campaign says the election-law changes made by Ohios Republican-controlled legislature and signed by Gov. John Kasich, a Republican, unfairly ends in-person early voting for most people on the Friday evening before Election Day a Tuesday but allows military and overseas voters to cast ballots in person until Monday, AP reported.
The campaign says the election-law changes made by Ohios Republican-controlled legislature and signed by Gov. John Kasich, a Republican, unfairly ends in-person early voting for most people on the Friday evening before Election Day a Tuesday but allows military and overseas voters to cast ballots in person until Monday, AP reported.
Restore the right. That means they want to strike down the law to allow everyone the full time.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)6. Thank you!!
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)2. Of course there's no truth to it.
Ohio is restricting early voting for everyone else except military ballots. It's blatant discrimination, and the Obama campaign wants everyone to be able to vote on those three extra days.
liberal N proud
(60,340 posts)5. Why would anyone think that Democrats would try to block people from voting?
Just the mere mention that they would do so raises a big...
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)7. "It's Breitbart. Any truth to this?"
You asked and answered your question at the same time!
But seriously, folks, send this link to your BIL.
rocktivity
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)9. LOL not Rachel
His head would explode.
CurtEastPoint
(18,656 posts)8. breitbart? 'Democrat' party? Really?
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)10. I didn't believe it for those very reasons.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)11. Unrec for even posting this nonsense. nt
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)12. Ghost Breitbart strikes out, again.