General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy is Daniels always described as a "porn actress" and not just "actor"?
Its of course accurate to note she has been in porn, but there are lots of facts that never make it into her description. And I dont see stories describing Trump as lying Donald Trump or former reality show personality Donald Trump, for example.
It seems somewhat misogynist to include it every time, when the genre really is irrelevant to her case. And/or it is an attempt to undermine her credibility because the porn industry is generally not respected.
Anyone agree?
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)I don't recall any acting.
htuttle
(23,738 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)Haven't seen one in so long...heh heh.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)WilmywoodNCparalegal
(2,654 posts)I'm female and sex-positive. I have watched my fair share of porn. Porn 'acting' exists. Many actors/actresses have to exaggerate their performance a lot. However, Shakespeare it is not. While I still believe that porn acting requires work, it does not rise to the level of a Dame Judi Dench performance. In addition, most porn has very substandard 'plots' that make serious acting difficult.
spooky3
(34,460 posts)Require non-porn performers to be award winning or stellar to be called actors. So its hard to accept that that would be the reason.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)If you must call her something, call her a "performer"
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Rudolf Nureyev was a dancer. The Chippendales are not.
Raine
(30,540 posts)peabody
(445 posts)I guess by saying "porn actress" the speaker is trying to elicit a response from listeners. It doesn't seem like it bothers her though--and why should it? Personally, I think it would be great if the media starts referring to Trump as "former reality show personality Trump."
LakeArenal
(28,820 posts)Kaleva
(36,312 posts)Or just "Porn Star". Could you provide some links to support your claim that she is ALWAYS described as a "porn actress"?
Here are links to articles that refute your statement:
https://people.com/politics/adult-film-star-stormy-daniels-sex-trump-in-touch-interview/
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/cherie-deville-the-porn-star-running-for-president
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-stormy-davidson-cohen-20180606-story.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/24/style/stormy-daniels.html
https://www.intouchweekly.com/posts/stormy-daniels-full-interview-151788
spooky3
(34,460 posts)Reference to the porn industry, which is the same as adult film industry. Why is the industry relevant?
Kaleva
(36,312 posts)Because your premise, that's she's always " refered as a "porn actress"", is false.
spooky3
(34,460 posts)Kaleva
(36,312 posts)"The porn star (really) running for president" from the 2nd link.
"Porn star Stormy Daniels..." from the 3rd link
and so on.
spooky3
(34,460 posts)porn star.
Kaleva
(36,312 posts)I may be wrong but i don't think she's ever described herself as an actress.
LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)Do the math. It's the media.
True Dough
(17,306 posts)Every character counts sometimes, even the porn flick characters!
forgotmylogin
(7,530 posts)If people say "actress, Stormy Daniels," your Grandma is going to go looking for her on IMDB.
Oh, didn't know this: turns out she played the porn star in The 40-Year-Old Virgin.
Also, I think media is just politely hedging as it's sort of common parlance to refer to performers in pornography generically as "porn stars"...but in the context of real-life and Hollywood, "star" has a different connotation. Daniels is not a "star" in the commonly understood Hollywood sense, and I think that's why they're defusing the superlative into "porn actress" or "adult film actress". "Adult film performer" probably would be a more accurate term.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)except she was MORE successful on her own without marring for money
Kilgore
(1,733 posts)spooky3
(34,460 posts)described. Those are just as factual and as relevant or irrelevant as her working in the porn industry. Why is that particular fact almost invariably included, if not to try to present her negatively? As someone suggested, she could be described as a performer or entertainer.
Shes also a wife and mother. Maybe shes a pet owner. Maybe she likes bicycling. Etc etc.
I see many are also not addressing the misogyny concern.
consider_this
(2,203 posts)that you consider it a negative presentation of her.
It's just a fact, like Amy is an accountant, David is a schoolteacher, Debbie a student.
It's her work/job. One of the first things people ask when meeting someone - 'oh, what do you do?', or 'oh, where do you work?'.
I think you're making something out of nothing.
She is what she is, does what she does for a living, and when I have seen her (on TV interviews, - not her movies or shows or whatever), she seems proud of it - so I see no issue here.
consider_this
(2,203 posts)a porn or adult actress is not at all the same thing as just 'actress', a meth cook is not the same as a cook, so - sorry extreme, not good example, but trying to make a point that it just seems to me an accurate description of her chosen line of work, so where is the foul?
Kilgore
(1,733 posts)Very friendly
Flexible
Open minded and adventurous
And possibly double jointed
All statements of fact. No misogyny here.
PoorMonger
(844 posts)Because it gets more clicks / eyes / ears than saying actress.
It is also unfortunate that it comes with a negative connotation in our society. Even here among liberal minded people there is this dismissive attitude toward people in the adult entertainment industry and it does wear against her claims over time, in a less perceptible but still significant way
spooky3
(34,460 posts)Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)FreeState
(10,572 posts)Stormy Daniels could be a male or female name.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,841 posts)spooky3
(34,460 posts)John Fante
(3,479 posts)Why pretend Stormy is something she's not? She's an adult film star, not Orson Welles.
samir.g
(835 posts)I know she was in 'The 40 Year Old Virgin', but she was still playing a porn star.
IMDB doesn't show any non-porn roles.
spooky3
(34,460 posts)In porn vs non porn films seems irrelevant, or worseincluded to dismiss or denigrate her.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Its like the old saying...
You bake one cake, and nobody calls you a baker.
You fix one toilet, and nobody calls you a plumber.
You paint one room, and nobody calls you a painter.
But, you just suck ONE cock, and....
janx
(24,128 posts)The genre is not irrelevant to her case, "believe me."
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)I've read some of her quips. She's funny.
Her occupation means nothing to me.
That she slept with Trump is a huge minus though.
Sorry. It just is.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)She's a thorn in his side.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Why arent deep sea divers just called divers?
Why arent grave diggers just called diggers?
Why arent truck drivers just called drivers?
janx
(24,128 posts)again.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)You need heart surgery, you go to a heart surgeon.
janx
(24,128 posts)She may change her mind shortly. And what about male porn stars? Long Dong Silver? Is a guy like that denigrated? What about Sylvester Stallone, who got his start in the porn industry?
These are specialties, at least initially.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I never saw a piece about either of them that didnt include the word porn.
janx
(24,128 posts)Why is no one standing up for them regarding their labels as porn stars?
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)On one hand, that just gives them an excuse to judge Ms. "Daniels" in a very negative manner, and unworthy of being taken seriously. But, it also SHOULD make Spanky just as bad in their eyes, since he had an affair with her, and obviously consumes the product she produces. Being the hypocrites they are on the right, most of them most likely only look down on the female half of this relationship, However.
spooky3
(34,460 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Acting is someone who takes a variety of roles, in different types of movies, on screen and/or on stage. She did one thing, and apparently did it well.
IMO it's not misogynistic to call her a porn star. It's distinctive work that is unlike what actresses normally do. But if anyone wants to call her an actress, that's fine.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)...moniker for Stormy is much more about him than it is about her. She is out and proud about her profession -- he, otoh, funneled money her way to shut her up.
She is a woman in a career I never would have chosen, but she is quite frank about it, open and unashamed, and it is legal. Stormy is a porn actress, or adult film actress, whichever.
janx
(24,128 posts)It wouldn't be my choice or the choice of my daughters, but she chose it. She may have chosen it out of ignorance as many women do. She continues to make appearances at strip clubs, etc., but I will be willing to bet that once she realizes she doesn't have to do that, her life will change.
Kaleva
(36,312 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Honestly, what she has going for her, are humongous breasts. Huge. Other than that, as far as being an 'actress' or a 'porn star', it's debatable. But then Daniels herself has said, that people in porn are not necessarily there for their acting abilities. Listen, people can make a lot of bucks in the 'adult film' industry. If it pays the rent and it's legal, I have no qualms.
TomSlick
(11,100 posts)That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Just like they call a famous football player a Football Star and not Sports Star or a famous race car driver a Racer or Race Car Driver and not just Driver.
Her entire public persona before this lawsuit was based on her adult film career, so its an accurate description.
samnsara
(17,622 posts)edbermac
(15,941 posts)Nicole Kidman won Best Actress that year for The Hours.
Stormy wasnt even nominated....she wuz robbed!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Because Daniels won it THREE TIMES!
Check out the awards on her Wikipedia page.
edbermac
(15,941 posts)I hate plastic boobz.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,076 posts)So, at least she came to her senses.
I'm a huge Kidman fan, but i always thought something was off when she committed to that dweeb.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)Beartracks
(12,816 posts)... it should shame his holier-than-thou, self-righteous, conservative fan base... if they had any shame, that is.
===========
Raine
(30,540 posts)she's done. Apparently she's alright with the title, she doesn't seem outraged about it.
Texasgal
(17,045 posts)What is shameful about being a Porn Star?
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)PJMcK
(22,037 posts)You make the distinction in your OP between "actress" and "actor." With 40 years in the entertainment world, I can assure you that female actors bristle at the word "actress." The profession is called "acting" and its participants are actors. That's just the way it is.
Interestingly, she's almost always called by her stage name and not her given name. Why is that? By now, anyone paying attention knows who she is.
As far as your question goes, do you find her credibility in question? I absolutely do not. Frankly, I doubt she gives a shit what we call her as she seems to be pretty confident about her life and accomplishments.