If Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump have conflicting stories about what was said at their summit?

[kentuck]

Who do we believe?

There is no one there to verify what was said or agreed to, it is my understanding?

We know they are both liars so who to believe?

[Crutchez_CuiBono]

1. Believe Kim.

Murderer, but, still more credible than the russian sympathizer dt.

[TheRealNorth]

2. It doesn't matter

no matter what happens, Trump will declare victory, Fox will spin it as such, and the MSM will equivocate that there two sides to the story and no one really knows.

[Docreed2003]

7. Sadly I think you're spot on...and it's designed that way

Why else would Hannity be there in Singapore for the first face to face interview with Trump after the talks???

This is kabuki theater and, I'm afraid, a good chunk of folks will fall for this crap.

[drray23]

3. That's by design.

This way both of them can go back to their domestic audience and say whatever they want.
Trump will declare it a victory. Move onto signing a peace treaty and pull the troops from south Korea. All that to try and get a nobel prize. Never mind that it will leave south Korea, Japan and others totally exposed as well as consolide China's hegemony in the region.

[targetpractice]

4. Major lesson I learned about dealing with narcissists...

Always have a witness. They like to have private conversations to "control the story."

[RockRaven]

5. We can't be certain what WAS said, but we can be certain it WAS NOT what either of them claim

That's the one sure bet, that they'll both lie.

[uppityperson]

6. There will be no "if" but only "when". I just said the same to my spouse.

Can you imagine if Obama did this?