Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,322 posts)
Tue Jun 12, 2018, 05:02 AM Jun 2018

Guardian: What have Trump and Kim signed? We read between the lines

But as it stands, the document does not differ greatly from the agreement issued by Kim and the South Korean president, Moon Jae-in, after their meeting on the southern side of the demilitarised zone at the end of April.
...
Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work towards complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

This is the most critical, and easily the most problematic, of the leaders’ statements. It does not meet Washington’s long-stated goal of complete, verifiable and irreversible dismantlement (CVID) of North Korea’s nuclear arsenal, but simply restates Kim’s position after his summit with Moon.

No serious analysts expected the North Korean leader to commit to CVID in his first meeting with Trump. That process – if it happens at all – could take years and cost billions of dollars.

It also fails to define what is meant by denuclearisation. In Washington, it requires Kim to abandon his nuclear ambitions. But the North Korean interpretation is more complicated. The regime believes it should include the withdrawal of the US nuclear umbrella from South Korea, possibly including the withdrawal of all 28,500 US troops ranged along the South’s border with the North.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2018/jun/12/trump-and-kim-document-analysis-singapore-agreement-denuclearisation
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guardian: What have Trump and Kim signed? We read between the lines (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Jun 2018 OP
Thank you! Lucinda Jun 2018 #1
It would have been nice to involve the South Koreans.... kentuck Jun 2018 #2
It sounds to me like tRumpski sold them out! lastlib Jun 2018 #3
I agree. He wants hotels, merchandise sales and the Noble Prize. pangaia Jun 2018 #4
he said so, "i see NK's beautiful beaches and condos in its future" sunonmars Jun 2018 #8
Yup, you said it. MBS Jun 2018 #7
Exactly. MBS Jun 2018 #6
Why any country would want to remain an "ally" of ours is beyond me. mac56 Jun 2018 #5
K&R BlueJac Jun 2018 #9
It boils down to a very expensive photo op. His cult followers will love it (Don's, not Kim's). Vinca Jun 2018 #10
"Fleeced in Our Time" B Stieg Jun 2018 #11

kentuck

(111,103 posts)
2. It would have been nice to involve the South Koreans....
Tue Jun 12, 2018, 06:01 AM
Jun 2018

...since it is their lives that are on the line.

There is a lot of anxiety in that part of the world this morning.

MBS

(9,688 posts)
6. Exactly.
Tue Jun 12, 2018, 07:04 AM
Jun 2018

Anxiety is the word, alright.
I'm worried, and I'm halfway across the world from them. I can only imagine what people in Seoul must be thinking right now.

mac56

(17,569 posts)
5. Why any country would want to remain an "ally" of ours is beyond me.
Tue Jun 12, 2018, 07:02 AM
Jun 2018

Which is precisely why Putin is dancing the macarena around the Kremlin.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guardian: What have Trump...