Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGuardian: What have Trump and Kim signed? We read between the lines
But as it stands, the document does not differ greatly from the agreement issued by Kim and the South Korean president, Moon Jae-in, after their meeting on the southern side of the demilitarised zone at the end of April.
...
This is the most critical, and easily the most problematic, of the leaders statements. It does not meet Washingtons long-stated goal of complete, verifiable and irreversible dismantlement (CVID) of North Koreas nuclear arsenal, but simply restates Kims position after his summit with Moon.
No serious analysts expected the North Korean leader to commit to CVID in his first meeting with Trump. That process if it happens at all could take years and cost billions of dollars.
It also fails to define what is meant by denuclearisation. In Washington, it requires Kim to abandon his nuclear ambitions. But the North Korean interpretation is more complicated. The regime believes it should include the withdrawal of the US nuclear umbrella from South Korea, possibly including the withdrawal of all 28,500 US troops ranged along the Souths border with the North.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2018/jun/12/trump-and-kim-document-analysis-singapore-agreement-denuclearisation
...
Reaffirming the April 27, 2018 Panmunjom Declaration, the DPRK commits to work towards complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
This is the most critical, and easily the most problematic, of the leaders statements. It does not meet Washingtons long-stated goal of complete, verifiable and irreversible dismantlement (CVID) of North Koreas nuclear arsenal, but simply restates Kims position after his summit with Moon.
No serious analysts expected the North Korean leader to commit to CVID in his first meeting with Trump. That process if it happens at all could take years and cost billions of dollars.
It also fails to define what is meant by denuclearisation. In Washington, it requires Kim to abandon his nuclear ambitions. But the North Korean interpretation is more complicated. The regime believes it should include the withdrawal of the US nuclear umbrella from South Korea, possibly including the withdrawal of all 28,500 US troops ranged along the Souths border with the North.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2018/jun/12/trump-and-kim-document-analysis-singapore-agreement-denuclearisation
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 3320 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (35)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guardian: What have Trump and Kim signed? We read between the lines (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2018
OP
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)1. Thank you!
kentuck
(111,103 posts)2. It would have been nice to involve the South Koreans....
...since it is their lives that are on the line.
There is a lot of anxiety in that part of the world this morning.
lastlib
(23,248 posts)3. It sounds to me like tRumpski sold them out!
Just like he's done with ALL of our allies.
-- --
pangaia
(24,324 posts)4. I agree. He wants hotels, merchandise sales and the Noble Prize.
Kim just jerked his chain
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)8. he said so, "i see NK's beautiful beaches and condos in its future"
MBS
(9,688 posts)7. Yup, you said it.
I can't believe the situation we're in.
Anxiety is the word, alright.
I'm worried, and I'm halfway across the world from them. I can only imagine what people in Seoul must be thinking right now.
mac56
(17,569 posts)5. Why any country would want to remain an "ally" of ours is beyond me.
Which is precisely why Putin is dancing the macarena around the Kremlin.
BlueJac
(7,838 posts)9. K&R
Vinca
(50,278 posts)10. It boils down to a very expensive photo op. His cult followers will love it (Don's, not Kim's).
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)11. "Fleeced in Our Time"
Trump now starring as the new Neville Chamberlain