How is this different than the agreement the Clinton administration made with North Korea in 1993 ?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

ON EDIT- There is nothing innovative or historic about Trump's meeting other than giving Kim statesman status.

[Cicada]

1. Clinton got actual results

NK promised to stop extracting plutonium from power plant pools. Surveillance cameras proved compliance. Bolton for Bush killed the deal, NK pulled the plug on the cameras and used the plutonium to make a bunch of atomic bombs.

[sunonmars]

2. NK has been doing these for decades, its screw all new.

[Johonny]

3. The difference is Clinton did it without meeting face to face with NK leader

or praising him on camera as a great guy who we can trust.

[erpowers]

6. He Also Did Not Give Away The Farm

Clinton also did not have to give up anything to get something. Clinton got just about the same things Trump got, but did not have to end joint military activity with South Korea, lift sanctions (I realize there might not have been any sanctions), or give legitimacy to Papa Kim on the world stage.

[Initech]

4. Because Trump has an R next to his name.

If we had a democratic president in charge guaranteed that the media would have a much different reaction. Shows you whose side they're really on.

[UTUSN]

5. The one that was more *solid*/professional and that NK didn't fulfill - *that* one?!1