General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAh Well! Einstein's travel diaries reveal 'shocking' xenophobia
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/12/einsteins-travel-diaries-reveal-shocking-xenophobia<snip>
The publication of Albert Einsteins private diaries detailing his tour of Asia in the 1920s reveals the theoretical physicist and humanitarian icons racist attitudes to the people he met on his travels, particularly the Chinese.
Written between October 1922 and March 1923, the diaries see the scientist musing on his travels, science, philosophy and art. In China, the man who famously once described racism as a disease of white people describes the industrious, filthy, obtuse people he observes. He notes how the Chinese dont sit on benches while eating but squat like Europeans do when they relieve themselves out in the leafy woods. All this occurs quietly and demurely. Even the children are spiritless and look obtuse. After earlier writing of the abundance of offspring and the fecundity of the Chinese, he goes on to say: It would be a pity if these Chinese supplant all other races. For the likes of us the mere thought is unspeakably dreary.
Zeev Rosenkranz, senior editor and assistant director of the Einstein Papers Project at the California Institute of Technology, said: I think a lot of comments strike us as pretty unpleasant what he says about the Chinese in particular.
Theyre kind of in contrast to the public image of the great humanitarian icon. I think its quite a shock to read those and contrast them with his more public statements. Theyre more off guard, he didnt intend them for publication.
-----------------
I weep for this planet
IluvPitties
(3,181 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)We know a lot more about the people of the world today than even Einstein knew in his day.
And our grandchildren will know much more than we do about the world and the universe.
bornfree17
(89 posts)Have said it better
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)Black Americans were perceived. But he disliked the Irish and Native Americans.
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)He wrote some hilarious things, and his War Prayer and coverage of the Spanish American war were fantastic.
malaise
(269,063 posts)Love his Letters from Earth.
Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)I don't see racism.
malaise
(269,063 posts)Where we agree is that commenting on nasty living conditions is not racist, but writing about why a Chinese man would be attracted to a Chinese woman or want to produce children is racist to the core
Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)manor321
(3,344 posts)elias7
(4,009 posts)and see how well some of our ideas and ways of being hold up.
trof
(54,256 posts)Nana! You mean you actually BURNED FUELS to travel from one place to another?
Didn't you KNOW what that was doing to the planet?
Why didn't you just teleport like we do now?
elias7
(4,009 posts)You people were such pigs! Im pruning you out of my family tree!
Oneironaut
(5,504 posts)We will probably not be judged too well 100 years from now. That is because society is constantly evolving. What is shockingly racist and unacceptable now was accepted and commonplace then.
Watch any 80's or 90's movie and see their treatment of the LGBT community. Look at the noble savage cliches used in older movies. Watch some of the WWII-era Looney Tunes cartoons, or Dr. Seuss propaganda posters against the Japanese. These seem offensive now, but were normal then.
JI7
(89,252 posts)Times were different back then .
None of this takes away from his greatness for me.
malaise
(269,063 posts)can be excused away because the perpetrators were all racists?
Sorry folks.
JI7
(89,252 posts)malaise
(269,063 posts)but if we say they were all racists others will use that to explain away genocide and slavery and a plethora of other evils committed by man against man and woman. I'm not buying that.
JI7
(89,252 posts)His views would have improved even more.
malaise
(269,063 posts)mn9driver
(4,426 posts)Taking his private writings a hundred years later as an indictment of his character implies that he was somehow supposed to be more enlightened about these things than everyone else he knew.
In 1858, Abraham Lincoln said this in a speech:
By the standards of the time, he was much more enlightened than most white people.
LSFL
(1,109 posts)He was much more enlightened than the deplorables too.
At least he knew to fight traitors rather than elect them.
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)after the Holocaust happened.
malaise
(269,063 posts)but his diaries show 'shocking xenophobia' as the Guardian states.
Revanchist
(1,375 posts)Was acting like a white European in the 1920s? I'm shocked, shocked I say!!!!!
You want to see a real, hardcore racist from that time frame? Read up on H.P. Lovecraft, his stories might be considered classic and groundbreaking, but boy the man covered all the bases: racist, xenophobe, anti semite, a real triple crown winner in that field.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I suppose it possible to be a scientific genius but not understand people too well. Yet a scientist would have to be smart enough to consider different cultures exist and approach things differently. There are Chinese geniuses - and I'd have thought he would have met them first. Average uneducated white people exist too. So he'd have seen that.