Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Jun 18, 2018, 05:07 PM Jun 2018

Don't Believe the IG Hype - By Josh Marshall

By Josh Marshall | June 18, 2018 3:59 pm

It’s refreshing to see at least one Democratic member of Congress roundly address Rep. Devin Nunes’ (R-CA) apparent role pushing to restart the Clinton emails investigation in the final weeks of the 2016 election. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) called Nunes “the President’s fixer in Congress.” But I would be highly, highly skeptical of DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s suggestion that claims that Rudy Giuliani received leaks from the New York FBI field office in the fall of 2016 may still be investigation. I’ve even seen some people speculating that he may be signaling the existence of a criminal probe that his office had to avoid interfering with. Again, be highly, highly skeptical.

My impression, based on the IG Report released last week as well as my own reporting is that the Inspector General plans to continue a series of follow-on probes dealing with specific leaks in a discrete and narrow fashion.

So, for instance, maybe there’s an agent in New York who fed information to Rudy Giuliani and perhaps he or she will be called out a future report. But this is not simply leaks. Leaks appear to have been part of a pattern of conduct aimed at forcing forward the Clinton probe, restarting it and forcing the announcement of that restarting of the probe in the weeks just before the election. It was a pattern of bias and biased behavior leading to a number of inappropriate actions which shaped the course of the investigation and the election. This is the overarching look at the situation that was wholly absent in last week’s IG Report. I do not expect any follow up report to do anything like that.

Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe there’s some big criminal investigation going on we don’t know about. I doubt it. I think these questions are inconvenient and not being asked.

###

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/dont-believe-the-ig-hype

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Don't Believe the IG Hype - By Josh Marshall (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2018 OP
Josh is missing the vital point....he said OnDoutside Jun 2018 #1

OnDoutside

(19,974 posts)
1. Josh is missing the vital point....he said
Mon Jun 18, 2018, 05:25 PM
Jun 2018
“If this was shared by New York field agents with Devin Nunes, was it also shared with Rudy Giuliani?” Schiff said in an interview on NBC News. “Or did Devin Nunes do something which we have seen subsequently, which is coordinate with the Trump team? Was this information shared by the committee with Rudy Giuliani, or shared directly with him?”


OR, was there a coordinated effort between the Trump Campaign and the FBI Agent(s) to delay revealing the existence of these emails to Comey, for a month, for maximum effect.

You'd have to think that Agent is in a whole heap of crap.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Don't Believe the IG Hype...