Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Jun 27, 2018, 06:09 PM Jun 2018

That Was Fast: Blumenthal Now Calls For SCOTUS Vote After Election


By David Taintor | June 27, 2018 5:00 pm

If you blinked you might have missed it.

After initially saying the Senate “should do nothing to artificially delay” the consideration of the next Supreme Court justice in the wake of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) now says a confirmation vote for President Trump’s next Supreme Court pick should take place after the 2018 midterm elections.

NBC News’ Garrett Haake captured Blumenthal’s original sentiment just before 3 p.m. ET:




By about 4 p.m., it appeared Blumenthal realized that was an untenable position:






Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) successfully blocked President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court pick following Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in 2016, arguing that the American people should have a voice in the choice by electing the next president.

TPM is rounding up Democratic senators’ positions on the precedent McConnell set here.

###

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/that-was-fast-blumenthal-now-calls-for-scotus-vote-after-election
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That Was Fast: Blumenthal Now Calls For SCOTUS Vote After Election (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2018 OP
You just know he got his ass burned to the ground via Wellstone ruled Jun 2018 #1
His taste buds finally detected the shoe leather? JHB Jun 2018 #2
Well done! NCTraveler Jun 2018 #3
Just maybe the Democrats will stick together on this one, but since we don't have the majority it still_one Jun 2018 #4
Mitch wants to slow play this one BannonsLiver Jun 2018 #6
Another chance, but it is a long shot, is that Mueller comes up with an indictment of trump, with still_one Jun 2018 #7
Sure that would help BannonsLiver Jun 2018 #8
In other words, not so fast Jack! An earful in email, a tweet Guilded Lilly Jun 2018 #5
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
1. You just know he got his ass burned to the ground via
Wed Jun 27, 2018, 06:20 PM
Jun 2018

twitter and e-mail. Buddy you best listen to what your voters are saying.

still_one

(92,382 posts)
4. Just maybe the Democrats will stick together on this one, but since we don't have the majority it
Wed Jun 27, 2018, 06:30 PM
Jun 2018

will be tough, and I have no doubt if trump wouldn't have any problem with a recess appointment



BannonsLiver

(16,448 posts)
6. Mitch wants to slow play this one
Wed Jun 27, 2018, 06:32 PM
Jun 2018

So I doubt he would disagree with blumenthal. They see this as a way to gin up fundie turnout in November, possibly saving the house and senate.

still_one

(92,382 posts)
7. Another chance, but it is a long shot, is that Mueller comes up with an indictment of trump, with
Wed Jun 27, 2018, 06:40 PM
Jun 2018

incriminating evidence, and the Democrats argue that a president under indictment should not be allowed to appoint someone to the SC


BannonsLiver

(16,448 posts)
8. Sure that would help
Wed Jun 27, 2018, 06:43 PM
Jun 2018

But it needs to happen in the next month or so. I don’t get the sense they are anywhere near that stage but I’d whistle zippity do dah out of my ass if I were wrong.

Guilded Lilly

(5,591 posts)
5. In other words, not so fast Jack! An earful in email, a tweet
Wed Jun 27, 2018, 06:32 PM
Jun 2018

Storm to make Hitchcock’s The Birds look like a Disney cartoon and a serious boot in the hind end changed his approach!
ALL Dems need the same.
EVERY single one.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»That Was Fast: Blumenthal...