General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Democrats' lost generation of leadership
But don't overlook another massive story out of the district: Rep. Joe Crowley's loss at the hands of Ocasio-Cortez effectively eliminates an entire generation of politicians that were seen as the future leaders of the party in Washington.
With the three top Democratic leaders in the House all in their late 70s, the gap between that trio and the 30-somethings still getting their sea legs in Congress is vast and stark. It's the 50-somethings who should fill that gap. But they are all gone.
Crowley's defeat comes on the heels of a series of implosions and career decisions that have robbed Democrats of an entire generation of leaders. Consider:
-Steve Israel of New York, the one-time head of Democrats' campaign arm, retired in 2016 rather than wait around for a chance at the top leadership jobs that seemed unlikely to develop anytime soon.
-Xavier Becerra of California, who was the 4th ranking Democrat in the House, resigned from Congress in late 2016 to serve as the Golden State's attorney general.
-Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, like Israel a former Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chair, decided not to wait around -- running for and winning an open Senate seat in 2016.
-Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida had a disastrous tenure as the chair of the Democratic National Committee in 2016 and took such a hit among liberal activists that there was some concern she might lose a primary fight for her safely Democratic seat. (She didn't.)
Each of these circumstances was somewhat unique. And yet, in each of the cases, the decisions made by the quartet above was driven in no small part by the total stasis within the upper ranks of House Democratic leadership...
More at: https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/28/politics/joe-crowley-nancy-pelosi-alexandria-ocasio-cortez/index.html
msongs
(67,420 posts)how many in each 10 year breakdown.
Exotica
(1,461 posts)look rudderless and in complete disarray.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Unfortunately, one of the strongest arguments for her to remain Leader is our bench strength in the House. Thats not shit stirring, its reality.
Exotica
(1,461 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Exotica
(1,461 posts)Democratic general election candididate. Colour me a 6 month noob, but methinks that is a TOS violation.
Response to Exotica (Reply #10)
Post removed
leftstreet
(36,109 posts)That's just...sad
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Like the Republican Party.
All those candidates in 2016. Defeated by a septuagenarian.
Keep peddling the story, national media. We know you're on our side.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Were about 20 years older. The Rs term limit their chairs and we dont. Our seniority rules are hidebound and weve lost talented people as a result, thats what this is about.
alwaysinasnit
(5,066 posts)decisions.....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/11/30/nancy-pelosis-biggest-leadership-challenge-might-be-beating-expectations/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e0f1ed9da74d
One thing is for sure, entrenched power tends to dig in rather than change, and that applies to both parties.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)RandySF
(58,911 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Crowley won the seat before it was redistricted - he doesn't even live in the current version of the district (he lived in the previous one from which he got elected).
Ocasio-Cortez won because she is the ideal candidate for this district.
That is the totality of the story.