General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCollins got a promise from Comrade Drumpt.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/07/get-played-jake-tapper-confronts-susan-collins-blindly-approving-judges-want-abolish-abortion/snip:
According to Collins, President Donald Trump promised her that he would not make opposition to abortion rights a litmus test for his Supreme Court nominee even though he had said as a candidate that women deserved to be punished for abortion.
If she votes to confirm a anti-abortion judge she should be given the nickname Coat hanger Collins.
manor321
(3,344 posts)Everyone knows this.
maxrandb
(15,316 posts)She knows that anyone in her circle, or her donors circle, have the means and ability to fly off to Canada or Denmark or Sweden and pay cash to terminate theirs or their childrens unwanted or life/health threatening pregnancy. Like Melania...she just doesn't care, do you?
She does absolutely nothing but give the Retrumplican party some kind of bullshit moderate cover.
Even her vote against repealing the ACA was bullshit. She was as surprised as mcturtle was when McCain voted against it. She had to think; "holy fuck! My throwaway moderate cover vote ACTUALLY FUCKING MATTERED this time."
Trust me, her vote is never supposed to matter, except to convince dumbass Democrats that...no really... you can trust me.
Here's the bottom fucking line for at least the next 4 elections.
If there is an R behind a candidates name, they must be crushed!!!
Almost forgot my rote response to Collins..."ahem, dear Susan, go fuck yourself sideways with a First Edition hard cover copy of Atlas Shrugged you worthless piece of amphibian shit"
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)It's all a show to sucker the rubes one more time.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)For that matter, when were Collins' promises worth a damn?
Maven
(10,533 posts)Step 1: Pretend to be a "principled moderate" who's really torn about whether to go along with her party
Step 2: Claim to have received some assurance from a party leader that X policy or Y appointee won't be the horror show every one knows it/he/she will be
Step 3: Vote with her party based on said assurance
Step 4: Act shocked when said assurance turns out to be meaningless
Enough of this vile fraud. Get her out, and elect a Democrat in her place. No, white independents, you aren't superior because you "vote for the person". Enough.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Lying is a requirement for the Republican party.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Right on schedule.
Hav
(5,969 posts)He'll still nominate someone who would vote to overturn it and Collins will still vote for anyone that is put up.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)Personal loyalty to the point of servility.
3catwoman3
(23,970 posts)It will have been asked already by MConnell et al.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)DFW
(54,335 posts)I think she uses her rep as a "reasonable" Republican to cover her from flak and unfavorable comparisons to other more outspoken radical Republican Senators--and THEN she ends up voting for Trump's crap, saying she got "assurances," which she either didn't, or knew Trump was lying from the get-go.
Clarity2
(1,009 posts)Hasnt she learned her lesson??
The #1 request from Evangelicals is overturning Roe V Wade. So you can bet any scotus appointee will have that as the agenda, even if they lie during confirmation hearings. And you can bet they will lie, since a conservative scotus can really do so much more damage besides roe v wade, including protecting and giving Trump more power.
Soxfan58
(3,479 posts)He loses evangelicals. Who do you think he will choose to please. Franklin Graham, or Susan Collins.
calguy
(5,304 posts)That way she can vote against her so called conscience while maintaining the facade of being a moderate. No one ever remembers when those so-called promises never get fulfilled. She's been running that con game for many years.
WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)which was soundly ignored after her vote? She's a waste of skin and a feckless con.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)I love the way you turn a phrase there.
WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)LyndaG
(683 posts)McConnell lied to her to get her on board for the tax plan vote. Does she ever learn ????
JDC
(10,125 posts)Nobody accepts the empty promise of of proven liars like Sue Collins. Nobody.
spanone
(135,816 posts)he scares the shit out of these mealy mouthed republicans
DeminPennswoods
(15,273 posts)to Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society. All the members of that group are anti-abortion.
spanone
(135,816 posts)"I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. Wade because that would mean to me that their judicial philosophy did not include a respect for established decisions, established law," Collins said on CNN's "State of the Union."
The Maine senator said when she met with President Donald Trump to discuss the vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy, she encouraged Trump "to broaden his list beyond" his standing list of 25 potential choices.
Collins said she is not comfortable with everyone on Trump's list of conservative names and stressed her preferences in their meeting.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/01/politics/susan-collins-supreme-court/index.html
Ilsa
(61,692 posts)Believing trump would be professional negligence on her part.
Generic Brad
(14,274 posts)Another pie crust promises fro Trump - easily made. Easily broken.
duforsure
(11,885 posts)Is just one con to another he'll do anything he claims he will. She's just conning her voters now. Another fraud. She knows .