General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMueller or Avenatti: Who would you pick as your lawyer?
Which approach do you prefer, the quiet, serious lawman or the grandstander who publicly exudes extreme confidence? If you were involved in a high-profile case, would you choose Robert Mueller as your lawyer or would you prefer Michael Avenatti?
katmondoo
(6,454 posts)brush
(53,764 posts)True Dough
(17,301 posts)The point of the thread is for you to choose one or the other.
brush
(53,764 posts)empedocles
(15,751 posts)All Star talent. Possible HOF.
demmiblue
(36,838 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I have never needed to have a legal battle fought in the public square. That seems to be Avenatti's niche.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)I tend to prefer Mueller's low-profile style in general. I have to say, though, that Avenatti has been pretty effective in presenting his cases to the public. We'll see how he does where the rubber meets the road in a trial.
True Dough
(17,301 posts)will boost or sink Avenatti's reputation, to a large extent. It will be fascinating to watch it all play out.
hlthe2b
(102,211 posts)to bias the jury pool or to wage reputation-destroying warfare ahead of time, clearly Avenatti is your guy.
In truth, Mueller is the quintessential PROSECUTOR, so that does not always translate well to DEFENSE law.
dameatball
(7,396 posts)True Dough
(17,301 posts)meatballs?
dameatball
(7,396 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)One is a prosecutor, the other an advocate--in current circumstances and temperament, I think.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)Avenatti is competent, sharp and effective. At the other end of the scale, Rootie Ghouli is . . .
True Dough
(17,301 posts)I mean, who would be foolish enough to select him, other than Dolt 45?