Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another Roe question... (Original Post) CTyankee Jul 2018 OP
Colorado was the first state to loosen restrictions on abortion -- six years before Roe v Wade hlthe2b Jul 2018 #1
We must defeat Stapleton. He's a nut case eleny Jul 2018 #6
NY and NJ Freddie Jul 2018 #2
Actually, NY has a fairly restrictive abortion law on the books brooklynite Jul 2018 #3
I think New Yorkers would have a shit fit if that happens. CTyankee Jul 2018 #4
I really like your Gov. Wolf Ohiogal Jul 2018 #5
No states would remain solid. NutmegYankee Jul 2018 #7

hlthe2b

(102,228 posts)
1. Colorado was the first state to loosen restrictions on abortion -- six years before Roe v Wade
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 12:56 PM
Jul 2018

I wish I were confident of it today. It will be war between Denver, Boulder and some Northern CO communities, versus the rest of the state, I fear.


http://time.com/4753918/colorado-abortion-law-50-year-anniversary/

Tuesday marks 50 years since a groundbreaking Colorado law significantly loosened tight restrictions on legal abortions.

Before the law, Colorado — like many states — allowed abortions only if a woman’s life was at stake.

In 1967, a Democratic freshman state lawmaker introduced a bill that allowed abortions if the woman’s physical or mental health was threatened, if the unborn child might have birth defects or in cases of rape or incest.

Rep. Richard Lamm said he feared he might be committing political suicide by introducing the bill to the overwhelmingly male, Republican-dominated Legislature.

But within weeks, Republican Gov. John Love signed the bill into law, making Colorado the first state to loosen restrictions on abortion — six years before the U.S. Supreme Court would legalize it nationally.

Freddie

(9,261 posts)
2. NY and NJ
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 01:03 PM
Jul 2018

For sure.
Not optimistic about PA. Gov Wolf is very pro-choice but our state legislature is full of troglodytes from the very gerrymandered state districts. They keep introducing anti-choice crap which Tom keeps vetoing. You know what they say about PA - "Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, with Alabama in between" - sadly the Alabama part rules our state legislature.

brooklynite

(94,503 posts)
3. Actually, NY has a fairly restrictive abortion law on the books
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 01:06 PM
Jul 2018

Roe v Wade made it irrelevant, but it was overturned the old law would be back in force. Replacing it will require Dems to take control of the State Senate.

CTyankee

(63,903 posts)
4. I think New Yorkers would have a shit fit if that happens.
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 01:08 PM
Jul 2018

I think the Dems would regain control of the state senate, guaranteed...

Ohiogal

(31,979 posts)
5. I really like your Gov. Wolf
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 02:16 PM
Jul 2018

He seems like a very decent fellow.

Here in Ohio we have our share of troglodytes in the state senate, too, who would be only too gleeful to ban abortion altogether in our state. They've been busy introducing one bill after another restricting it and of course Kasich will happily sign anything that restricts women's health care rights. We desperately need a Dem governor this fall! De Wine is worse than Kasich, he won't even support the Medicaid expansion. I hope and pray that Ohio gets smart and elects Cordray.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
7. No states would remain solid.
Wed Jul 4, 2018, 02:24 PM
Jul 2018

The right to privacy isn't subject to state restrictions. It existed for 1000 years as part of English Common Law. If Roe gets reversed, the court says that right never existed and it'll result in a national ban and other horrors.

Once the precedent is set that the Government can force their will on people's medical decisions, they could start to force obese people onto state controlled diets. They could start monitoring any aspect of your private life and interfere at will in any medical decision.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another Roe question...