General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKey GOP senator: I won't support any Supreme Court nominee that has shown 'hostility' to Roe v. Wade
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), on Wednesday reiterated that she would not vote for any Supreme Court nominee chosen by President Trump if they have demonstrated hostility to Roe v. Wade.
I think Ive made it pretty clear that if a nominee has demonstrated hostility to Roe v Wade and has said that theyre are not going to abide by that longstanding precedent, that I could not support that nominee, Collins told MSNBC.
Link to tweet
But Collins added that she could not yet take a position on any nominee as we dont even know who the nominee is.
Im amazed that people on both sides of the aisle have already committed to voting either before or against the nominee whose identity they do not know, Collins said.
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced last week that he would retire, opening up a spot on the bench for Trump to nominate his second conservative justice.
Kennedy has been a swing vote on the bench for more than three decades. Kennedy was key in siding with liberal justices to support Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion nationwide.
http://thehill.com/homenews/395539-key-gop-senator-i-wont-support-any-supreme-court-nominee-that-has-shown-hostility-to
JarOCats
(119 posts)We'll see what happens when push comes to shove -- and then hear her flimsy excuse for caving.
spanone
(135,831 posts)we shall see.
hatrack
(59,585 posts)"Huh! Why is this piece of paper blank?!?!?"
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I don't trust her for a minute.
manor321
(3,344 posts)They will get 50 votes to confirm.
This battle was lost in November 2016.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)herding cats
(19,564 posts)Then she'll act shocked! when they do and feign outrage.
Her voters apparently buy her act, though. Which is all that matters to her.
GP6971
(31,146 posts)Anyone nominated by Dotard has to be a liar. Just like him. If you really meant it, you wouldn't support anyone he nominates.
betsuni
(25,503 posts)Being anti-abortion gets voters to the polls every election. They would miss it.
Response to betsuni (Reply #8)
CentralMass This message was self-deleted by its author.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)This was meant to be a reply to the main thread.
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)otherwise theyll have to come up with some other golden goose. This one has been giving eggs to them for decades.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,686 posts)kimbutgar
(21,138 posts)She is not trust worthy.
DoctorJoJo
(1,134 posts)radius777
(3,635 posts)She sucks, and it's high time we got a Dem in that seat.
mr_liberal
(1,017 posts)She will vote against Amy Coney Barrett.
I don't know what she'll do with Kavanaugh or Kethledge though. Its hard to tell where either of them stand, especially Kethledge. Kethledge hasn't said anything at all about Roe or abortion that Ive seen, not a thing.
forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)Why would she change her vote now?
Bucky
(54,005 posts)OnDoutside
(19,956 posts)what she should be saying, but of course she's a liar.
pwb
(11,261 posts)You say one thing and do another so much you always sound like your out of breath . Lying is hard on the lungs I guess.
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)Didnt she?
So did 54 other Senators (Dems included), so how do they change their vote only 9 moths later?
That is why I feel she is the number 1 pick.
Shes also from Indiana, so I would think a Donnelly vote is a given.
elias7
(3,998 posts)She is fooling herself or her constituency if she thinks otherwise
Demsrule86
(68,563 posts)your soul to the devil.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,175 posts)And when Mitch comes up to you and bats his beady little eyes, you KNOW you'll vote for anything he wants.