Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dread Pirate Roberts

(1,896 posts)
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 08:17 AM Jul 2018

A white supremeicist with security clearance-what could possibly be wrong with that?

There's Trump's America for you. Why should taking part in hate group marches deny you security clearance, right? I mean who here among us hasn't dabbled in violence and hatred when we're not working on sensitive government projects. Apparently Northrup Grumman is just fine with his after work activities.


He Is a Member of a Violent White Supremacist Group. So Why Is He Working for a Defense Contractor With a Security Clearance?

There likely isn’t such a thing as a “typical” violent white extremist in America in 2018. Still, Michael Miselis — a University of California, Los Angeles doctoral student with a U.S. government security clearance to work on sensitive research for a prominent defense contractor — makes for a pretty unusual case.

For months, ProPublica and Frontline have been working to identify the white supremacists at the center of violent demonstrations across the country, including the infamous Unite the Right rally last August in Charlottesville, Virginia. The Rise Above Movement, a Southern California group that expresses contempt for Muslims, Jews, and immigrants, became a focus of that effort. ProPublica and Frontline were able to quickly identify a number of the group’s leaders, and find evidence that put them in the middle of violence in Charlottesville and Berkeley, California, among other places.


Read the rest here: https://www.propublica.org/article/michael-miselis-rise-above-movement-white-supremacist-group-northrop-grumman

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A white supremeicist with security clearance-what could possibly be wrong with that? (Original Post) Dread Pirate Roberts Jul 2018 OP
K&FuckingR! Guy Whitey Corngood Jul 2018 #1
I am flying my flag heaven05 Jul 2018 #2
What A Chilling Article.... Laxman Jul 2018 #3
Kick and recommend for visibility of this evil. bronxiteforever Jul 2018 #4
Just when I think things can't get any worse... catbyte Jul 2018 #5
K&R ck4829 Jul 2018 #6
No words except sanctioning.. appalachiablue Jul 2018 #7
Edward Snowden worked for gov't contractor with highest security clearance FakeNoose Jul 2018 #8
Kick democrank Jul 2018 #9
It's a lot more common than DUers may think IronLionZion Jul 2018 #10
That's disturbing, wow. ck4829 Jul 2018 #13
You'd be surprised how many Eastern European immigrants have clearances IronLionZion Jul 2018 #15
There can be many reasons for what you posted- not all racism Lee-Lee Jul 2018 #21
Nevertheless, I persisted IronLionZion Jul 2018 #22
Jared K finally got his security clearance so he could sell more secrets. keithbvadu2 Jul 2018 #11
And his father in law has access to nuclear weapons. EricJohnson Jul 2018 #14
up to the top blogslut Jul 2018 #12
I just noticed the guy is wearing a Go-Pro! Dread Pirate Roberts Jul 2018 #16
I guess it's because NOT-psycho people have porn ck4829 Jul 2018 #17
Odds are his access to classified information is suspended now pending review Lee-Lee Jul 2018 #18
Post removed Post removed Jul 2018 #19
Just look at those neanderthals!!!!!!!!!!!! ailsagirl Jul 2018 #20
People have been posting this article to their Facebook. N/t gay texan Jul 2018 #23
What is that weird helmet on the guy diagonally in front of him? keithbvadu2 Jul 2018 #24
Star Wars playset? Dread Pirate Roberts Jul 2018 #25
Tactical helmet DetroitLegalBeagle Jul 2018 #27
So, on him it is a toy. keithbvadu2 Jul 2018 #28
Trump is a White Supremacist Johnny2X2X Jul 2018 #26

Laxman

(2,419 posts)
3. What A Chilling Article....
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 08:49 AM
Jul 2018

apparently they have this guy on tape participating in violence in California and in Charlottesville. He spends his spare time with violent convicted felons. His co-workers and Northrup Grumman are aware of his activities. It looks like they're O.K. with it. Wow. Pro Publica and Frontline have been busy identifying these guys-to what result....we shall see.

IronLionZion

(45,380 posts)
10. It's a lot more common than DUers may think
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 09:20 AM
Jul 2018

Contracting firms are so focused on blocking out born and raised US citizens with brown skin like me (for national security reasons ) that they often turn a blind eye to violent white terrorists, since the leadership might quietly agree with white supremacy as part of the company culture.

Racial segregation is commonplace for many government IT services contractors where American minorities are assigned to projects with H-1Bs on high volume low profit career-ending garbage and whites get pipelined for the clearance projects straight out of college.

Many of these assholes were saying openly racist things and threatening their minority coworkers with impunity years before Trump ever ran for politics.

Even on DU, some of our fellow DUers have made the argument that white supremacists are still loyal to America but Indian-Americans might secretly be loyal to India (allied to US) so we can't risk it. Some liberals are worse for my heart than fast food.

IronLionZion

(45,380 posts)
15. You'd be surprised how many Eastern European immigrants have clearances
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 10:23 AM
Jul 2018

as in they grew up in the Soviet Union and still have thick accents.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
21. There can be many reasons for what you posted- not all racism
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 11:01 AM
Jul 2018

I do this for a living.

Remember, contractors don’t issue clearances, don’t establish the process for getting them and don’t set the rules. They have to just supply people who can qualify for the cleanrace.

And it’s in their interest to sponsor people for clearances who are most likely to get a fast approval- because if you hire someone and their clearance ends up denied you just wasted a ton of time and money, and if you hire someone whose clearance takes twice or three times as long to adjudicate that means you lose money.

So if a person has significant foreign ties- close family overseas, owns land overseas, travels often to visit people overseas, that can take a whole lot longer for OPM to investigate and adjudicate if the cleanrace is approved, and that’s if.

I am talking about the difference between a person with no issues on an SF-86 who has zero foreign contacts or travel, good credit, no criminal history in today’s backlog can get a clearance in 6-9 months at fastest (I’ve seen it 4 months in the past but not these days). If you add to that someone with significant family ties overseas and foreign contacts, travels, etc that will take it well over a year and I’ve seen it go over 2 years. Same if the person had a criminal history or bad credit or anything else that requires deeper investigation.

Is it fair? No. But that is how it works.

So employers are already hamstrung. They have to invest time and money into sponsorship of a cleanrace. If you get rejected that money is lost. They have to wait for it to come back to employ you in that job- so either they have to find busy work for you in the meantime to put you on the payroll or they have to gamble you won’t change you mind about accepting the job, and the longer it takes the more likely you are to change your mind. And every day longer it takes is a day longer they don’t have anyone doing the job they need someone to do.

In my job I prescreen all our applicants to see if there are any issues that would prohibit a security clearance or delay one. If I find issues that would give a high chance of it being denied I recommend we don’t hire. If I see issues that would indicate a delay I pass that on, and they determine based on the pool of applicants and the individual and how badly the position must be filled if they want to wait for the longer adjudication. If the person is worth the extra wait and risk we do. If there is a well enough qualified applicant we know we can have on the job months faster, often they get it.

It’s not so much about your loyalty, it’s about how fast or slow your clearance is likely to be approved from the employers perspective.

IronLionZion

(45,380 posts)
22. Nevertheless, I persisted
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 11:31 AM
Jul 2018

Changing companies was the only way for me. It's very interesting to work for a massive defense contractor for several years and hear increasingly creative excuses before I have no other choice but to send resumes to competitors. Even I was surprised by how fast I got my clearance.

Dread Pirate Roberts

(1,896 posts)
16. I just noticed the guy is wearing a Go-Pro!
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 10:27 AM
Jul 2018

What does he do, go home and watch video of himself beating up women and shouting racist slogans?

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
18. Odds are his access to classified information is suspended now pending review
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 10:37 AM
Jul 2018

Once his security manager became aware they would have to suspend his access to classified information and forward that information to OPM.

OPM will have to investigate. Part of the determination will have to be if the organization is a hate group. That seems to be a no-brainer, but that official determination takes time and this is a new group. However his participation in the violence alone can be enough to revoke his clearance if it’s determined to be him. OPM will have the ability to look into his records and see if he traveled there once they open an investigation.

Almost certainly his clearance will be suspended and placed in inactive status by OPM pending the investigation (the employer suspends access to classified information but can’t suspend the clearance, OPM issues them and they do that). Once the investigation is done the cleanrace will be revoked, and at that time if he wishes he can appeal the revocation before an administrative law judge.

Response to Dread Pirate Roberts (Original post)

DetroitLegalBeagle

(1,914 posts)
27. Tactical helmet
Thu Jul 5, 2018, 02:13 PM
Jul 2018

The front mount is for NVG, the side rails for IR, cameras, lights, etc. Probably a cheaper ABS version instead of a true ballistic helmet.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A white supremeicist with...