General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMore on the lions that ate rhino poachers...
(I didn't see this posted on the original thread. Sorry if it was.) Anyway, apparently the privately owned rhino reserve put the lion pride there to protect its rhinos. Good job kitties!
The remains of what appears to be three bodies were discovered on the Simbuya Game Reserve along with high power rifles owner Nick Fox said in a statement. Fox said the poachers mangled remains are suspected to have been eaten by a pride of six lions who were on the reservation to protect the endangered and highly targeted rhinos who are hunted for their horns.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/pride-lions-killed-ate-group-200757005.html
Polly Hennessey
(6,794 posts)calimary
(81,238 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)don't stand a chance against stealthy apex predators.
dubyadiprecession
(5,708 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)rocktivity
(44,576 posts)rocktivity
olegramps
(8,200 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)those poachers probably didn't taste very good.
ashling
(25,771 posts)that these lions deserve an award from the World Wildlife Federation as well as inclusion in the anti-poaching programs giving them the same elan and authority as legendary K-9 Units in law enforcement and military's the world over ...
as I understand it
Give me an "L",
Give me an "I",
Give me an "O - N - S"
Lions, Lions, You're the BEST! Gooooooooo LIONS!
A little too much? OK, I'll calm down in a minute .... or two
UTUSN
(70,686 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)haele
(12,650 posts)and will leave them alone...most cats have memory at enough significant degree to be able to recognize who to trust and who might be a threat in different species if they've been socialized.
Sort of like my kitties at home. They all love spouse and me, and to some degree, the grandkids whom they are all now familiar with. But, two are skittish and view all visitors (even if they've seen them before) as threats, one is a love bug and makes a bee-line to any visitor we have unless that visitor reacts badly, and the other, well - she observes. And mets out justice as she sees fit (usually depended on how the love-bug is treated or how we are reacting.)
Ever see a 250 or so pound human against 8 lb. ball of whiplash-quick solid black razor-sharp-edged rage? Even that's not a close contest, the human always loses or must retreat out of the territory that little kitty has marked as hers. Now consider any small number of men against a small group of 300 - 500 lbs. of whiplash quick solid balls of razor-sharp-edged rage that have been quietly hunting them for a half hour or so...even if they're armed...
Haele
cab67
(2,992 posts)I understand the rationale, but for many animals (including wild cats), the error rate for distinguishing friend from foe can be unnervingly large. Domestic cats are saturated in a human environment; wild lions are not.
Many years ago, I read about a stuntman in an action movie who was going to shoot a scene with a leopard. The leopard was fairly tame, and it got very used to the stuntman during rehearsals. But when the stuntman showed up in costume, the leopard stopped playing and started fighting for real. Regardless of scent and training, it saw a stranger encroaching on its space and protected itself.
There's also the issue with personnel turnover among rangers. How will they socialize a new ranger with the lions? And what if a ranger becomes a poacher? (It actually happens - the money from rhino horn can be very, very, very tempting.) Would the lions leave that person alone, even though he means harm?
My concern is actually less with the lions attacking a ranger than with them approaching a stranger for a handout. They may not view ALL strangers as poachers. When that happens, they lose their fear of humans. This never ends well for the lions.
My suspicion is that the lions are trained to respond to certain cues. They may not know a ranger on sight, but know that certain sounds (maybe a whistle) mean "back off." They may also to leave the vehicles used by rangers alone, though parts of the reserve may not be vehicle-accessible.
I could, of course, be completely wrong about this.
And just to add to the chorus - go lions!
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)I would think tracking the lions and avoiding their immediate area whenever possible could play a big role in the safety strategy.
MFM008
(19,808 posts)To worry. Really bad.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)BillyBobBrilliant
(805 posts)for the right job! Bravo!
brush
(53,776 posts)Petosky Stone
(52 posts)Kittycow
(2,396 posts)If any other poachers decide that they can just do things differently and outsmart the Lions, I hope they also get their just deserts.
That was a very good call to put the Lions there in the first place
tblue37
(65,340 posts)lostnfound
(16,178 posts)I hate poachers, love rhinos...but cheering when three human beings are eaten by lions is sick, twisted, and what the Romans used to do when they threw Christians to the lions.
I am horrified to see the comments on these posts and we will all be horrified when it gets picked up as indicative of what DU is about.
I understand dark humor but this is really passes the boundary, in my opinion.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Some decent human beings are trying to protect vulnerable endangered species against sick bastards who only care about their bottom lines. Poachers are now subject to the death penalty in Kenya, because all other means of protecting elephants and rhinos have failed. I don't believe in the dp, but completely understand the logic. At least putting lions on reserves makes it a fairer fight.
Petosky Stone
(52 posts)I really have no sympathy for them.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I think logical fallacies, self-righteousness, and poorly thought out conclusions lacking any evidence to support them reflects poorly on DU as well.
kiri
(794 posts)Let us remember the atheist aphorism.
Oh! So many Christians, so few lions!
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)This is nothing remotely like the Romans and their horrible games. These men chose their fate.
Easy lesson- dont poach the most endangered mammal on earth and you will not get eaten by lions.
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)They know the risks and choose to kill poach anyway. Screw them. I hope this kind of thing happens to more often.
mokawanis
(4,440 posts)Last edited Fri Jul 6, 2018, 08:03 PM - Edit history (1)
celebrating the violent deaths of people is creepy and wrong, imo. I don't get how anyone can celebrate people being mauled and mutilated.
edit - mangled, not mutilated. lol fucking du
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)That's nature.
Only humans torture and mutilate other creatures for fun and profit.
The men that were eaten would have killed these magnificent, highly endangered creatures, sawed off their horns to sell, and left their mutilated bodies to rot. Here is a picture of what poachers did to rhinos in that same area: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210835400#post23
Being happy that did not happen, and that karma caught up to these evil men, is not "creepy" or "wrong."
mokawanis
(4,440 posts)They didn't mutilate them? The article says they were "mangled". Is there a difference? I'm not here to defend poachers, but I am here to state my opinion that celebrating the deaths of these people is wrong. I'm glad the animals they intended to poach are ok, but I would prefer the perps were sitting in jail, not dead.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)Lions are not fastidious eaters.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,326 posts)mokawanis
(4,440 posts)mokawanis
(4,440 posts)I was just responding to someone who said they weren't mutilated. I wasn't complaining about the eating habits of lions.
Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)mokawanis
(4,440 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)Glad I could help.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)The lions' intent was only to eat.
That is very different from the intent of the murderer who mutilates his victims, or the intent of the poachers to saw off the Rhinos horns after killing them. Mutilation is a human specialty.
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #73)
mokawanis This message was self-deleted by its author.
mokawanis
(4,440 posts)the definition of mutilate is:
to cut up or alter radically so as to make imperfect.
to cut off or permanently destroy a limb or essential part of.
Of course the lions' intent was to eat. Did someone say otherwise?
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)The word is commonly used to imply malice. Synonyms include:
"vandalize, damage, deface, ruin, spoil, destroy, wreck, desecrate, trash: the painting was mutilated."
The article does not use the word "mutilate." Why bring it up in regard to the lions?
It is one thing to not be happy with how the poachers met their end, but another to vilify the lions. There is no excuse for vilifying lions for being lions.
mokawanis
(4,440 posts)they were just being lions. My complaint is that some people are making jokes and celebrating the deaths of other people. They are entitled to their opinions, I am entitled to mine.
As for the word mutilation that you and a few others have focused on - that word is also commonly used in a way that does not imply malice. Like years ago when a friend got his hand caught in a machine at work, a nasty accident that left his hand so mutilated the docs decided to amputate. Did the machine have malicious intentions? Of course not. Did the lions have malicious intentions? Of course not.
I'm not vilifying the lions, and your statement that I am is bullshit.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Last edited Sat Jul 7, 2018, 02:59 AM - Edit history (1)
And no, in the context of killing someone, mutilation has a very specific meaning and connotation. It very much suggests malice, evil and sadism. That was an inappropriate word to use with regard to these lions. As you acknowledge, the lions were just being lions.
The only evil in that preserve walked on two feet.
Look, I get it. You didn't intend to vilify lions. It appears you were trying to vilify the posters here celebrating the lions eating the poachers. So you suggested that what these posters were really celebrating was the mutilation of these poachers. One problem with that statement is that it also vilifies the lions. Of course, another problem with the statement is it unfairly vilifies DUers celebrating the lions getting the poachers.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)It's a win for all three species involved.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)Totally agree.
billh58
(6,635 posts)criminals profiting from killing an endangered species. Unlike the Christians fed to lions by the Romans, these less-than-human idiots willingly went to their deaths by taking an unacceptable risk -- and losing the gamble. Good riddance to them, and the planet has three fewer inhumane criminals.
We sincerely appreciate your concern, but DU is doing just fine.
aggiesal
(8,914 posts)7 Disagree with your comment
1 Agrees with your comment.
Wait make that 8 disagree.
But I'm not celebrating their death, I celebrating that endangered species remain alive.
These 3 choose their own fate. Nobody pushed them out into an arena for entertainment.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)Those humans were violent criminals, trespassing with the intent to kill.
They ran into a pride of lions. The lions reacted accordingly to what lions do when prey wanders into their territory.
Violent criminals meet their end, entirely due to their own choices and actions.
Excellent side benefit: no rhinos were injured!
It's a win for all three species.
billh58
(6,635 posts)Coventina
(27,115 posts)amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)Not a fighting chance.
All I can say is...Good Kitties
JustAnotherGen
(31,819 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Virtue signaling over dead poachers and lecturing forum posters on being sick and twisted reflects poorly on DU.
Only good poacher is a dead poacher. Preferably consumed by an alpha predator or other ironic demise.
Kali
(55,007 posts)Too bad the middlemen and buyers of rhino horn weren't on the menu too.
kcr
(15,315 posts)This is nothing like when Romans threw Christians to the lions. No one threw these poachers to the lions. They put themselves there, poaching. Do you know what poaching is?
MFM008
(19,808 posts)None.
They broke onto a preserved area
with guns and axes to kill rare rhinos.
Karma solved this problem.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Romans didnt arm the people they threw in to be torn apart and eaten.
Your comparison is ridiculous.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)In both examples.
a la izquierda
(11,794 posts)Rhinos are endangered. Humans arent and (should) have the presence of mind to be better stewards of the planet and its creatures.
Chemisse
(30,811 posts)I am glad that the rhinos were saved, but it is wrong to be gleeful about the death of another human being, no matter how reprehensible that person is.
Maraya1969
(22,479 posts)three poachers are going to stop a bunch of other poachers. So it is not just 3 dead, it seems to represent a change in the wind. Poachers now know that they will be prey to lions if they intend to hunt rhinos and their big guns won't protect them. Maybe this event will have a bigger limiting effect on rhino poachers.
Raine
(30,540 posts)on DU anyway this isn't dark humor it's karma and for a change nature comes out on top.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Haven't heard that one before
Cha
(297,196 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,789 posts)Stallion
(6,474 posts)...just got to look for it
ellie
(6,929 posts)MarianJack
(10,237 posts)...WOMP WOMP!
PEACE!
Botany
(70,501 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)This is why I celebrate the deaths of poachers
rickford66
(5,523 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Well, I'm happy to see they're fully employed!
Iggo
(47,552 posts)What a concept.
Submariner
(12,504 posts)After tenderizing and being torn to shreds by a pride of lions, if the remaining meat is dried and salted correctly, the lions can have a nice "human beef jerky" snack if live poachers running for their lives are not on the menu that night.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Lions can eat a huge amount of meat.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)relogic
(155 posts)We might be encouraged by this sense of justice for despicable poachers. However, the likes of the rump sons (king of poacher spawn) tells us our precious wildlife are no match against these cruel trophy hunters or poachers of any ilk.
How sad that instinctive lions in need of food are utilized as a force in the hope of protecting creatures against a greedy, and superstitious motivated industry. They (lions) will ultimately lose like so many extinct mammals if the proud hunters of our civilization are not irradiated by any karma available.
H2O Man
(73,537 posts)coupon for cat food, I'd say.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)This is awesome. That means the lions won't be put down and are not a danger to any normal people, just poachers.
Homer Wells
(1,576 posts)catbyte
(34,377 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
AllaN01Bear
(18,191 posts)tblue37
(65,340 posts)even more, um, delicious.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)And I agree, delicious!
Best_man23
(4,898 posts)And the Lions applied this justice swiftly.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Poachers sneaking into a protected sanctuary and trying to keep a low profile are no match for them.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)They sneak up on you. What's cool about how lionesses hunt in small groups is that they furtively surround their prey in a sort of pincer formation before creeping close enough to pounce. I don't know how they coordinate their positions but evidently they do.
kimbutgar
(21,137 posts)jaysunb
(11,856 posts)NBachers
(17,108 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,579 posts)And good kitties. Hope they were tasty snacks.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)...now literally.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Lions eat everything on their prey, especially rather small ones like humans.
Brains are very nutritious and they are seldom wasted.
Hell, I feed my 10lb cat raw meat. She will polish off a chicken thigh till nothing is left. Takes her about 20 minutes to knaw down the entire bone.
DFW
(54,370 posts)No wonder so many Republicans go trophy hunting in Africa.
Predators obviously give them a low priority for their poor nutritional content.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)a rabbit.
The two ducks were in the back yard and a neighbors cat came over the fence and was stalking them. Three of the house cats jumped into action and chased that cat back over the fence and away. It all happened so quickly that I think I moved all of three steps during the time.
No way that those cats were going to allow another cat to attack their ducks.
Hassler
(3,377 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Now, let's feed them Tess Talley!
Judi Lynn
(160,527 posts)Raine
(30,540 posts)Good Kitties, wonderful job!
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)meow2u3
(24,761 posts)They could use a bottle of Rolaids to alleviate their indigestion. I heard poachers could turn a lion's stomach.
Guilded Lilly
(5,591 posts)applegrove
(118,642 posts)way to protect animals and give local people an income.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)populistdriven
(5,644 posts)TeamPooka
(24,223 posts)KayF
(1,345 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)ecstatic
(32,701 posts)Especially considering that high powered rifles were no match?