Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PunkinPi

(4,875 posts)
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 08:20 AM Jul 2018

NBC: Justice Kennedy & Trump were in negotiations for months re. Kavanaugh pick to replace



Source familiar tells NBC that Justice Kennedy had been in negotiations with the Trump team for months over Kennedy’s replacement. Once Kennedy received assurances that it would be Kavanaugh (his former law clerk) Kennedy felt comfortable retiring - @LACaldwellDC & @frankthorp
7:16 AM - Jul 10, 2018


The fix was in from the get go.
60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NBC: Justice Kennedy & Trump were in negotiations for months re. Kavanaugh pick to replace (Original Post) PunkinPi Jul 2018 OP
Horrendous disrespect for the highest court in the land. Trust Buster Jul 2018 #1
A horrendous disrespect for anyone who won't kiss Trumps fat ass. olegramps Jul 2018 #42
Life time appointments lend themselves to corruption of the system. olegramps Jul 2018 #43
Betcha Deutsche Bank figured prominently in the background dalton99a Jul 2018 #2
Bingo. Baitball Blogger Jul 2018 #4
Yep. nt PunkinPi Jul 2018 #6
Double BINGO! n/t ewagner Jul 2018 #11
Justice Kennedy's son, correct? FailureToCommunicate Jul 2018 #15
Yep - "Say hello to your boy. Special guy." dalton99a Jul 2018 #16
On video to boot... PunkinPi Jul 2018 #22
Yep. dalton99a Jul 2018 #25
I'm no legal scholar, but I'm wondering if this is just unethical or is it illegal? Arkansas Granny Jul 2018 #3
There is no law on this, just unethical marylandblue Jul 2018 #5
This is the kind of shit that republicans would gin up and loose their minds over Cosmocat Jul 2018 #12
Is separation of powers an "ideal"? A concept only? SHRED Jul 2018 #26
Probably another one of those "it's a norm but not a law" things. Amaryllis Jul 2018 #57
According to Norm Eisen... PunkinPi Jul 2018 #23
Maybe there should be a law that the executive branch cannot have sinkingfeeling Jul 2018 #7
No meetings before or after confirmation, with sitting or prospective justices. lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #8
Seems like we need a lot of new, stronger, clear-cut ethics laws since 45 came to light. KPN Jul 2018 #32
Tainted. And this makes Kavanaugh seem corrupt once he learns these facts ... Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2018 #9
They're backing off on this now Shrek Jul 2018 #10
Additional tweet in the thread.... PunkinPi Jul 2018 #18
AND the White House isn't denying --- RandomAccess Jul 2018 #46
Thanks for adding! nt PunkinPi Jul 2018 #59
Any Senator voting to allow this pick to serve duforsure Jul 2018 #13
In a normal ethical world, that might be true. KPN Jul 2018 #34
Is anyone remotely surprised? Amishman Jul 2018 #14
Every fucking thing tRump does is nothing but a "business" deal. Texin Jul 2018 #17
Edit that: "shady business deal". KPN Jul 2018 #35
Yes - RandomAccess Jul 2018 #47
it is possible that Kennedy helped us out here... i guess the jury is out on that lancelyons Jul 2018 #19
Kennedy was never a moderate. He was always very conservative, The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2018 #33
More conservative than A. Kennedy progree Jul 2018 #41
Mueller should haul Kennedy avebury Jul 2018 #20
+1. It's a safe bet Mueller is looking at all sources of financing dalton99a Jul 2018 #24
Damn straight. Democrats should start demanding an imvestigation into potential criminal acts KPN Jul 2018 #37
NO question... Schumer should be all over this! InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2018 #54
Good god in Butter Botany Jul 2018 #21
Kennedy took a risk that 45 would honor his word. He must have dirt. bitterross Jul 2018 #27
Colluding traitors. lark Jul 2018 #28
Is that type of quid pro quo agreement legal? Nitram Jul 2018 #29
If this is merely unethical and not illegal pecosbob Jul 2018 #30
Excellent point SHRED Jul 2018 #31
I like it. It definitely provides a rationale that gives cover re: packing the court. It's already KPN Jul 2018 #39
Let you forever be remembered for "this" Justice Kennedy.... NM Grins Jul 2018 #36
McConnell announced cancellation of the August recess DesertRat Jul 2018 #38
They are stealing the Supreme Court and getting away with it! Initech Jul 2018 #40
They're trying -- but we STILL have a chance -- RandomAccess Jul 2018 #50
minngal marieo1 Jul 2018 #44
OMG...and Kennedy believes and trusts the word of that putrid useless bag of Hyena shit! sdfernando Jul 2018 #45
Apparently not -- he got nominated, didn't he? RandomAccess Jul 2018 #51
Yes he did, and I'm shocked he actually did it. sdfernando Jul 2018 #52
This. Is. Bad. DeminPennswoods Jul 2018 #48
This is so WRONG Achilleaze Jul 2018 #49
Kennedy just torched his career C_U_L8R Jul 2018 #53
WTF? Delphinus Jul 2018 #55
Is this legal? Although I guess that has become irrelevant. Amaryllis Jul 2018 #56
Can't wait for the midnight tweetstorm railing against FAKE NEWS NBC!!!!! Boomerproud Jul 2018 #58
So disrespectful Kennedy has tarnished his legacy beyond repair...and Kavanaugh should Demsrule86 Jul 2018 #60

dalton99a

(81,485 posts)
16. Yep - "Say hello to your boy. Special guy."
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:41 AM
Jul 2018
During Mr. Kennedy’s tenure, Deutsche Bank became Mr. Trump’s most important lender, dispensing well over $1 billion in loans to him for the renovation and construction of skyscrapers in New York and Chicago at a time other mainstream banks were wary of doing business with him because of his troubled business history.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/28/us/politics/trump-anthony-kennedy-retirement.html

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
5. There is no law on this, just unethical
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 08:32 AM
Jul 2018

We are really far from the Constitution's assumptions. There was no consideration of a judge picking his own successor.

Cosmocat

(14,564 posts)
12. This is the kind of shit that republicans would gin up and loose their minds over
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:29 AM
Jul 2018

if it were a D, while gloating over them doing it.

Cancerous to the process and slipping further into fascism.

But ... Not "illegal" and now perfectly acceptable for a country that relentlessly indulges republican fuck wittery.

PunkinPi

(4,875 posts)
23. According to Norm Eisen...
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:02 AM
Jul 2018



If this is true, Kennedy had a major conflict of interest as to Trump while sitting in judgment on Trump’s actions including the Muslim ban. A judge cannot secretly negotiate a benefit he badly wants with a litigant who has other business before his court. Hearings must address.

sinkingfeeling

(51,454 posts)
7. Maybe there should be a law that the executive branch cannot have
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:12 AM
Jul 2018

private meetings with SCOTUS judges in order to keep this from happening. The Constitution has the 3 branches separate but equal.

KPN

(15,644 posts)
32. Seems like we need a lot of new, stronger, clear-cut ethics laws since 45 came to light.
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:31 AM
Jul 2018

As a country, if and when we ever recover the norms of democracy, we had better heed the obvious signals we are getting daily this past 18 months or so about such needs, or we will risk a sequel in relatively short order.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,001 posts)
9. Tainted. And this makes Kavanaugh seem corrupt once he learns these facts ...
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:27 AM
Jul 2018

... unless he withdraws on finding out. He may not have been a party to the Trump-Kennedy deal, just a useful so-and-so.

Shrek

(3,979 posts)
10. They're backing off on this now
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:29 AM
Jul 2018


To be clear: This is from one source and dont have any info on whether potus talked to kennedy about a possible replacement.

PunkinPi

(4,875 posts)
18. Additional tweet in the thread....
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:47 AM
Jul 2018


Politico article linked in tweet (long read, snips below)-> https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/09/brett-kavanaugh-trump-private-meeting-706137

After Justice Anthony Kennedy told President Donald Trump he would relinquish his seat on the Supreme Court, the president emerged from his private meeting with the retiring jurist focused on one candidate to name as his successor: Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Kennedy’s former law clerk.

So even as Trump dispatched his top lawyers to comb though Kavanaugh’s rulings and quizzed allies about whether he was too close to the Bush family, potentially a fatal flaw, the president was always leaning toward accepting Kennedy’s partiality for Kavanaugh while preserving the secret until his formal announcement, sources with knowledge of his thinking told POLITICO.

Administration officials said Trump was taken with Kavanaugh even before his conversation with Kennedy. But Kennedy, in leaving the impression with Trump that Kavanaugh would be a great candidate for the job, helped the president make up his mind.

____
bold for emphasis

 

RandomAccess

(5,210 posts)
46. AND the White House isn't denying ---
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 03:23 PM
Jul 2018

White House doesn't deny report Trump made secret deal with Kennedy over retirement, replacement
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210850641

duforsure

(11,885 posts)
13. Any Senator voting to allow this pick to serve
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:31 AM
Jul 2018

To protect trump from prosecution, indictments, and being compelled to testify for Mueller is complicit in organized criminal activity now, and could be consider co-conspirator's and charged. If its proven Kennedy was blackmailed out of his position to replace him with this loyalist for him , it could get a lot worse for those involved very quickly, especially with ties to Duesch bank his son works at. This is going to backfire and make things a lot worse for these criminals.

Amishman

(5,557 posts)
14. Is anyone remotely surprised?
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:38 AM
Jul 2018

And if the confirmation hearing go poorly, all Kennedy has to do is announce that he would very much like for Kavanaugh to be his replacement and any vulnerable Republicans have the cover they need to vote Yes.

Sen Collins just has to say 'while a have my reservations about Kavanaugh, I feel honored bound to respect the wishes of Justice Kennedy in deference to his lifetime of service and good judgement'.

Democrats should just boycott all proceedings and get this over with. Makes a cleaner political statement and lets us move on. The last thing we want is to stir up and give unity to the Right in the run-up to the election. We need to have the headlines hammering Trump, not filled with stories about a fight we aren't going to win.

Texin

(2,596 posts)
17. Every fucking thing tRump does is nothing but a "business" deal.
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:42 AM
Jul 2018

Every damn thing is actually a monetized transaction.

 

lancelyons

(988 posts)
19. it is possible that Kennedy helped us out here... i guess the jury is out on that
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:49 AM
Jul 2018

it is possible that Kennedy helped us out here... i guess the jury is out on that

Why would Kennedy, a moderate on the court and one that sided with Liberals from time to time.. insist on Kavanaugh as a condition of his retirement?

I have to think Kennedy was not trying to screw a chunk of America.

There are some rumors out there that Kavanaugh might have been considered not conservative enough.

Perhaps he will also side with Liberals from time to time.


Jury is out? not sure.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,683 posts)
33. Kennedy was never a moderate. He was always very conservative,
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:32 AM
Jul 2018

occasionally taking a less extreme view on social issues.

progree

(10,907 posts)
41. More conservative than A. Kennedy
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:49 AM
Jul 2018

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/09/brett-kavanaugh-trump-private-meeting-706137

Trump allies see him (Kavanaugh) as more conservative than his mentor (Kennedy) and the most confirmable of the group, particularly with Republican senators. “I think he knows his record was more conservative than Kennedy’s,” one Trump ally said of the president’s decision.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
20. Mueller should haul Kennedy
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:54 AM
Jul 2018

in for a conversation. It sure looks like another case of obstruction of justice.

dalton99a

(81,485 posts)
24. +1. It's a safe bet Mueller is looking at all sources of financing
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:02 AM
Jul 2018

And Kennedy's son played a key part in keeping the Trump empire afloat

KPN

(15,644 posts)
37. Damn straight. Democrats should start demanding an imvestigation into potential criminal acts
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:37 AM
Jul 2018

around this -- NOW!

Botany

(70,503 posts)
21. Good god in Butter
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 09:59 AM
Jul 2018

And don’t forget Trump was getting his money from Deutsche Bank after the US Banks stopped loaning him any $$ because of all the times he filed bankruptcy in order not to pay his bills and Justice Kennedy’s son was working @ Deutsche Bank too.

The American Right Wing, Russian Organized Crime, the super rich, Fox News, parts of the GOP and Christian Evangelicals are working at installing their people in order to fuck us all and steal power.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
27. Kennedy took a risk that 45 would honor his word. He must have dirt.
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:06 AM
Jul 2018

Kennedy must have some good inside info on 45. I'd think that would be the only way he'd take the risk on 45 doing what he said he would do.

lark

(23,099 posts)
28. Colluding traitors.
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:08 AM
Jul 2018

The Kennedy banker, the Kennedy justice and drumpf - traitors to the US and Russian tools, each and every one of them!

Nitram

(22,794 posts)
29. Is that type of quid pro quo agreement legal?
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:12 AM
Jul 2018

If this is true, Kennedy is as much a scumbag as Trump.

pecosbob

(7,538 posts)
30. If this is merely unethical and not illegal
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:18 AM
Jul 2018

then it certainly justifies an executive act creating three or four more justices as FDR threatened to do.

KPN

(15,644 posts)
39. I like it. It definitely provides a rationale that gives cover re: packing the court. It's already
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:41 AM
Jul 2018

been unethically packed!

DesertRat

(27,995 posts)
38. McConnell announced cancellation of the August recess
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 10:40 AM
Jul 2018

McConnell announced cancellation of the August recess a short time before Kennedy made his surprise retirement announcement. He knew a SCOTUS nominee was coming.

 

RandomAccess

(5,210 posts)
50. They're trying -- but we STILL have a chance --
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 03:29 PM
Jul 2018

read this first:
The 2-Step Strategy to Win the Supreme Court Fight
https://www.indivisible.org/resource/2-step-strategy-win-supreme-court-fight/

CNN’s political strategist breaks down perfect reason no red-state Democrat should support Trump’s SCOTUS nominee 09 Jul 2018 at 16:43 ET https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142105114
.............................
During a conversation with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Begala said that it’s an “easy” decision and there is no question, any Democrat in a red-leading state or district should oppose whomever the nominee happens to be.
“Here’s why,” Begala began. “No Republican paid a price at all at the polls for opposing Merrick Garland, who was President [Barack] Obama’s moderate choice. A moderate nominee of a popular president, they opposed him in lockstep and nobody suffered.”
...........................
“So, you’re not going to gain a single vote supporting this nominee as a Democrat in a red state,” he continued. “If you do support it, you lose the Democrats. So, I think it’s actually an easy vote, not a difficult one. I’m glad they’re going — they should hear him out. I think terrific, the American way. But the politics are actually not hard for the red state Democrats.
In many red states, Democrats often believe that they have to persuade conservatives to vote for them rather than to invest in getting out the vote for their own base. Republicans, by contrast, get their base to the polls and attack their opposition.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/07/cnns-political-strategist-explains-perfect-reason-no-red-state-democrat-support-trumps-scotus-nominee/

marieo1

(1,402 posts)
44. minngal
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 11:12 AM
Jul 2018

I don't understand how something like this can happen. Why are Rep held to a different standard than Democrats? If Democrats had pulled such a stunt and were as slimy as the reps, the reps would just howl and scream. What is the matter with our system?

Also, why can't immigrants seek protection in our country? We give protection to white supremacists, neo-Nazi's, and lots of other hate groups. Our government should have gone after these hate group years ago. Those are the people I am afraid of, not immigrants that just seek a better life here in our country.

sdfernando

(4,935 posts)
45. OMG...and Kennedy believes and trusts the word of that putrid useless bag of Hyena shit!
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 12:43 PM
Jul 2018

With all due respect to Hyenas.

How could anyone, ANYONE believe he will do what he says/promises/gives his word to do?

He lies, that is his reality, he has no other.

Justice Kennedy, you got taken for a ride and conned, forever you will be tarred with this. Great way to end a career.

Fuck them both!

sdfernando

(4,935 posts)
52. Yes he did, and I'm shocked he actually did it.
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 03:35 PM
Jul 2018

Perhaps Kennedy the younger has some goods on hyena-shit that helped convince him.

C_U_L8R

(45,002 posts)
53. Kennedy just torched his career
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 03:40 PM
Jul 2018

What a disgraceful way to retire. He got greedy.

As for the Trumps, they are absolutely corrupt and need to be ejected.

Boomerproud

(7,952 posts)
58. Can't wait for the midnight tweetstorm railing against FAKE NEWS NBC!!!!!
Tue Jul 10, 2018, 08:52 PM
Jul 2018

It might be one worth reading for shits and giggles.

Demsrule86

(68,559 posts)
60. So disrespectful Kennedy has tarnished his legacy beyond repair...and Kavanaugh should
Wed Jul 11, 2018, 06:12 AM
Jul 2018

be impeached as should Gorsuch...doubt we have a legal way to do that though.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NBC: Justice Kennedy & Tr...