Kavanaugh could drastically shift the court to the right. The Senate should take care. - WaPo Edit.

[DonViejo]

By Editorial Board

July 9 at 9:06 PM

Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to replace retiring Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court comes at a tense moment. It could drastically shift the court’s tenuous ideological balance, and it comes not long after Senate Republicans disgracefully blocked President Barack Obama from making a court pick in his final year. More than ever, the court is in danger of becoming viewed as an instrument of politics rather than an independent, nonpartisan branch of government.

That is why senators must be even more exacting than usual when they evaluate Mr. Kavanaugh. They should insist on a justice who would rule with modesty and genuine independence of mind — and a willingness to resist abuses of power by this and future presidents. “I believe that an independent judiciary is the crown jewel of our constitutional republic,” Mr. Kavanaugh said following his introduction. He must show he means it.

Mr. Kavanaugh meets the basic qualifications for high court service. A Yale Law School graduate who clerked for Mr. Kennedy, he has served for 12 years on the powerful U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The country certainly could have expected worse from President Trump. Yet Mr. Kavanaugh came from a list of potential nominees preapproved by conservative activist groups. Their goal is to tilt the court as far right as possible as quickly as possible.

Mr. Trump’s first nominee, Neil M. Gorsuch, was, in his confirmation hearings, the least forthcoming Supreme Court nominee in recent memory. Mr. Kavanaugh must do better. Fortunately, he comes with a huge record.

more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/what-the-senate-must-demand-of-brett-kavanaugh/2018/07/09/38a813ca-83bf-11e8-8553-a3ce89036c78_story.html

[oberliner]

1. Clarence Thomas replaced Thurgood Marshall

And he was confirmed even though Democrats held a 57-43 majority in the Senate.

That was the beginning of the most radical shift in the recent history of the court - culminating with yesterday.

[riversedge]

2. That was a dark, ugly day in America. Anita Hill would agree. The #metoo Movement did not exist

at the time. If a person with her allegations came forward today, it would be different.

[oberliner]

4. "If a person with her allegations came forward today, it would be different."

Except multiple people have come forward with much worse allegations against Trump (and he has said much worse things on tape) - and he was still elected (and is still supported by all Congressional Republicans).

[dalton99a]

3. They basically picked a reliable party functionary for the job

[Orsino]

5. Maybe not drastically?

Kennedy still pretended to be a Justice, but was a reliable wingnut vote. Kavanaugh seems likely to abandon the pretense, which may make his absolutely-fucking-terrible only a bit worse.

The billionaires will be in a big hurry to push their agenda, though, so Kav may make the Court even more willing to hear shit cases.