General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe hard right is now in charge of the US Supreme Court
The crucial role that the Supreme Court plays in US public life was perhaps best explained by Alexis de Tocqueville, in 1835. The President may slip without the state suffering, for his duties are limited, he wrote in Democracy in America. Congress may slip without the Union perishing, for above Congress there is the electoral body which can change its spirit by changing its members. However, de Tocqueville added, if ever the Supreme Court came to be composed of rash or corrupt men, the confederation would be threatened by anarchy or civil war.
So what happens when you have a court not just composed of rash and corrupt men but also appointed for life by the most rash and corrupt of men? The American people cant say they werent warned.
[link:https://www.newstatesman.com/world/2018/07/hard-right-now-charge-us-supreme-court|
Very interesting article. It is not wrong...
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Of course that is already forgotten, but the people shall decide, ie "impeachment.
And it can happen.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)but recent appointments have resulted in a right/white wing tinge. Maybe easier removal of Justices would be good, but the fact is that when we vote for Prez -- and Congress to a lessor degree -- we are voting for SC appointments.
It sucks to heck right now, but things will turn around at some point.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)And the republic managed to survive, even if some were seriuosly harmed.
The pendulum of justice goes back and forth.
It's a nice dream to think of a Court that will decide "properly" every time, but even if everyone agrees what a "proper"decision is, it just ain't gonna happen.
The only real difference between a conservative and a liberal is that the conservative tells you what's good for him, while the liberal tells you what's good for you.