Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jaxind

(1,074 posts)
Fri Jul 13, 2018, 09:39 AM Jul 2018

Tit for Tat re: Strzock hearings

MSNBC, CNN, Washington Post etc. need to find something where Gowdy, Chaffetz etc said negative things about Hillary, and then the investigative journalist needs to ask, "If bias should disqualify someone from an investigation, then why was Gowdy (Chaffetz, etz) allowed to investigate Hillary on Benghazi?!"

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tit for Tat re: Strzock hearings (Original Post) jaxind Jul 2018 OP
Exactly -- and many other examples too RandomAccess Jul 2018 #1
Apparently, whataboutism is uni-directional... Wounded Bear Jul 2018 #2
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tit for Tat re: Strzock h...