General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnother possible reason for the GRU indictments today
pointed out on Rick Wilson's twitter feed (no link since it's blocked at my office)
Since the GRU is Russian MILITARY intelligence, the election hacks and attack would qualify under Article 5 of the NATO treaty as an act of war on a member. While this would allow other countries to help us, it might also be setting up Mueller charging some members of Team Trump with treason since it's an act of war.
Pachamama
(16,886 posts)FakeNoose
(32,614 posts)Don't ever question Mr. Mueller. Tick-tock Motherfuckers!
Response to FakeNoose (Reply #20)
Leghorn21 This message was self-deleted by its author.
CanonRay
(14,094 posts)AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)this a great legal trail to have. Also, I beleive military related issues usually fall outside of US judicial system like SC and are handled by military tribunals.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)and they love to run around with their cheap little "make in a thailand sweatshop" American flag pins, pretending that they are patriotic. What utter horseshit.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)the very large company that I worked for at the time gave all their employees little hand sized American flags.
However, I remember commenting sarcastically at the time that it didn't feel right that we just got American flags - made in China.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)jrthin
(4,835 posts)lapfog_1
(29,198 posts)trump... even on fundamental republican values like free trade (the 97-2 vote was only symbolic, it didn't actually strip any power from trump to impose sanctions, only recommended that the Congress should think about it).
The indictments point to more than the Trump campaign as conspirators with the GRU on stealing emails for specific Democratic candidates for Congress... and possibly some state and local elections as well...
The entire GOP was in on it. They are all guilty of conspiring with a foreign government to receive stolen property and to use that stolen property to affect an election. They are all traitors.
This is the reason that the House and Senate "russia investigations" are not going anywhere. The shameful show yesterday. Everything.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)that some time after Democrats win the House in the fall that Mueller has his team go arrest several members of Congress for this conspiracy as well.
herding cats
(19,558 posts)I'm not sure if treason can be a retroactive charge, but if nothing else I hope it makes some Republican Russian buddies sweat bullets!
malaise
(268,850 posts)H2O Man
(73,527 posts)But it is leading to a RICO charge involving several of the Trump people.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)RICO would make it look a whole lot worse to the general public
H2O Man
(73,527 posts)Those associated with the campaign, transition team, and Whit House that haven't been subpoenaed to testify in front of the grand jury are in deep trouble. Today's indictments built a strong foundation for this (following those for other internet crimes). If we look at those who communicated -- often in person -- with Russian intelligence during the campaign and transition, it further puts into focus the group that will be charged.
This was a good day, an important day.
WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)JDC
(10,122 posts)alwaysinasnit
(5,063 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)Article III, Section 3, US Constitution
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii
Note that Trump has stated recently that he sees Russia not as an enemy but as a competitor.
Good luck on that one, Mr. "President." We shall see.
Because he is saying that, it is obvious that he is worried and trying to argue against a charge of treason just in case.
I'm not saying that he committed treason. I'm just quoting the definition of treason in the Constitution and pointing out that Trump appears to be attempting to avoid being accused of it.
https://www.rferl.org/a/trump-view-putin-competitor-not-enemy-provokes-ire-in-congress-mccain-corker-menendez/29360576.html
TNNurse
(6,926 posts)Not that I would blame them.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)so, I'm sure NATO would have our backs
leftieNanner
(15,078 posts)I bet they would be front and center.
Cicada
(4,533 posts)Courts have held treason requires waging real war, physical violence, things which can kill or cause severe physical harm, or aiding those conducting real war, violence etc. An act of war can be something which justifies war even if the act of war is not real war, violence, itself. So I agree military intelligence interfering in an election is an act of war but I think it is a cause of war, not war itself. So I dont agree that this could qualify as treason, as the crime of treason is defined in the US.
Julius Rosenberg stealing nuclear bomb technology for USSR might be an act of war but Rosenberg was not a traitor in a legal sense. He was not charged with treason.
Not that this matters. Conspiracy to hack in violation of cyber crime laws carries a long term.
Squinch
(50,934 posts)spanone
(135,814 posts)lark
(23,083 posts)I love Mueller and knew this was laying the base for conspiracy against the US charges, but you are right, since it's military it's an act of war and so treason. My only concern is that the supine Russian repug SCOTUS will throw out the charges, but they'd have a much more difficult time doing that with charges of treason. I pray you are right!!
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,107 posts)Or at least an SOS.