Another curious 'coincidence' in Sept, 2016.

[triron]

Link to tweet

[LonePirate]

1. The OH cancelation makes sense as he was always significantly ahead there. Not so in FL and NC.

Clinton was very strong is early voting in both FL and NC; and polling was close enough to expect advertising expenditures from both campaigns in the two states. The cancelation of ad buys in those states is certainly strange, given the close final result and what we learned from the latest indictments from Mueller.

[triron]

2. No.

[Cracklin Charlie]

3. Can you explain your curiosity, triron?

I always found it curious that he quit paying his internal pollsters around that time, too.

Like, he didn’t need them anymore, so why pay?

[triron]

4. Why those 3 states in particular? Seemed totally against strategy

Last edited Sat Jul 14, 2018, 11:55 PM - Edit history (1)

to win. Polls showed all 3 close. The Trump campaign knew something.

[fierywoman]

5. Did the trumpies know those states would be rigged by their friends in their favor? Aren't

the voting machines there the Diebold ones?

[triron]

6. I don't think that is the case (that Diebold used). But they knew something the Clinton camp

did not. Perhaps Cambridge Analytica knew something.

[uponit7771]

7. K&R