Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,056 posts)
Thu Jul 19, 2018, 11:46 AM Jul 2018

Is it preferable to subpoena the translator or to never know what Trump and Putin discussed...?

...in secret, behind closed doors?

Should we hesitate to find out what they discussed or should we follow precedent since no translator has ever been subpoenaed before? Is it better to never know the extent of the betrayal, rather than break precedence?

Is it any more simple than that?

These are not normal times we are living in. The translator should be questioned immediately. Not tomorrow. Not next week. But immediately.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it preferable to subpoena the translator or to never know what Trump and Putin discussed...? (Original Post) kentuck Jul 2018 OP
Have any journalists attempted to interview the interpreter? nocoincidences Jul 2018 #1
she/he can't talk. Its called executive priviledge so this is just "noise" beachbum bob Jul 2018 #2
So we have no need or right to know? kentuck Jul 2018 #3
again, it will be covered by executive privildge. I don't make the rules. The inteperter could beachbum bob Jul 2018 #8
Isn't the translator position a creation of Congress? kentuck Jul 2018 #9
discussion in front of or in with communication of the president is considered "priviledge" doesn't beachbum bob Jul 2018 #10
That is debatable with Congressional subpoena... hlthe2b Jul 2018 #6
I generally agree Sgent Jul 2018 #11
Nothing for nothing but, Crutchez_CuiBono Jul 2018 #4
Thank you for this response. It is definitely some comfort to me. onecaliberal Jul 2018 #12
Of course. Crutchez_CuiBono Jul 2018 #13
Thank you. onecaliberal Jul 2018 #15
We get control of congress then bluestarone Jul 2018 #5
When we reach that Big Rock Candy Mountain.... kentuck Jul 2018 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Crutchez_CuiBono Jul 2018 #14

nocoincidences

(2,216 posts)
1. Have any journalists attempted to interview the interpreter?
Thu Jul 19, 2018, 11:51 AM
Jul 2018

If the Repukes won't bring it to Congress to evaluate, let the American people see the information and examine it for ourselves!!

kentuck

(111,056 posts)
3. So we have no need or right to know?
Thu Jul 19, 2018, 11:56 AM
Jul 2018

If Putin and Trump conspired behind closed doors ? Thems the rules?

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
8. again, it will be covered by executive privildge. I don't make the rules. The inteperter could
Thu Jul 19, 2018, 12:07 PM
Jul 2018

talk but would face prosecution

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
10. discussion in front of or in with communication of the president is considered "priviledge" doesn't
Thu Jul 19, 2018, 12:17 PM
Jul 2018

matter who the person worked for

hlthe2b

(102,142 posts)
6. That is debatable with Congressional subpoena...
Thu Jul 19, 2018, 12:06 PM
Jul 2018

He might try, but Congress does have a case to make before the courts. I think they would prevail in closed session, but not public.

Sgent

(5,857 posts)
11. I generally agree
Thu Jul 19, 2018, 12:20 PM
Jul 2018

that executive privilege would prevent him talking to Congress. That said its an open question if the privilege applies in a criminal trial.

I would also suspect that its an open question for purposes of an impeachment trial.

Crutchez_CuiBono

(7,725 posts)
4. Nothing for nothing but,
Thu Jul 19, 2018, 11:58 AM
Jul 2018

the Secret Service, The CIA, and the FBI. (as well as NSA DNI etc) already know what was said. Most likely the "translator" was part of OUR (Americas) Team and has been briefed before, and de-briefed after. Already. In private. Intel agencies are red hot mad at this loon. It's SOP for stuff like this. They are vastly ahead of the game.
Either way, the truth will out.

Response to bluestarone (Reply #5)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it preferable to subpo...